[PATCH] mm: zswap: add myself back to MAINTAINERS

Vitaly Wool posted 1 patch 2 months, 4 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
[PATCH] mm: zswap: add myself back to MAINTAINERS
Posted by Vitaly Wool 2 months, 4 weeks ago
The patch removing me from MAINTAINERS was sent when I was on a
winter vacation. Missed it then, my bad, but never acked it either.

Let's get back to status quo.

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.se>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 9dd4111d7d96..f3bfbfa27fce 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -27474,6 +27474,7 @@ ZSWAP COMPRESSED SWAP CACHING
 M:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
 M:	Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
 M:	Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
+M:	Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.se>
 R:	Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
 L:	linux-mm@kvack.org
 S:	Maintained
-- 
2.39.2
Re: [PATCH] mm: zswap: add myself back to MAINTAINERS
Posted by Johannes Weiner 2 months, 4 weeks ago
On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 02:34:38PM +0200, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> The patch removing me from MAINTAINERS was sent when I was on a
> winter vacation. Missed it then, my bad, but never acked it either.

The maintainer change was based on an influx of code contributions by
new shareholders, but also an extended period of unresponsiveness by
the previous maintainers on these new changes.

You flagging this change 1.5 years later is sort of a case in point.

Anyway, the other two maintainers acked it. I'm comfortable going with
majority vote, and keeping the maintainer list as-is.

Thanks
Re: [PATCH] mm: zswap: add myself back to MAINTAINERS
Posted by Vitaly Wool 2 months, 4 weeks ago
> On Jul 9, 2025, at 4:06 PM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 02:34:38PM +0200, Vitaly Wool wrote:
>> The patch removing me from MAINTAINERS was sent when I was on a
>> winter vacation. Missed it then, my bad, but never acked it either.
> 
> The maintainer change was based on an influx of code contributions by
> new shareholders, but also an extended period of unresponsiveness by
> the previous maintainers on these new changes.
> 
> You flagging this change 1.5 years later is sort of a case in point.
> 
> Anyway, the other two maintainers acked it. I'm comfortable going with
> majority vote, and keeping the maintainer list as-is.
> 
> Thanks

I have a gut feeling that they acknowledged own removals and not mine. Let’s get them in the loop to confirm this.

~Vitaly