pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(),
pm_runtime_autosuspend() and pm_request_autosuspend() now include a call
to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). Remove the now-reduntant explicit call to
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy().

Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
---
The cover letter of the set can be found here
<URL:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20250704075225.3212486-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>.

In brief, this patch depends on PM runtime patches adding marking the last
busy timestamp in autosuspend related functions. The patches are here, on
rc2:

        git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \
                pm-runtime-6.17-rc1

 drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c b/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
index d17c701c7888..2d0d348aa278 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
@@ -1139,7 +1139,6 @@ static void trf7970a_switch_rf_off(struct trf7970a *trf)
 	trf->aborting = false;
 	trf->state = TRF7970A_ST_RF_OFF;
 
-	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(trf->dev);
 	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(trf->dev);
 }
 
-- 
2.39.5

On 04/07/2025 09:54, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(),
> pm_runtime_autosuspend() and pm_request_autosuspend() now include a call
> to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). Remove the now-reduntant explicit call to
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> The cover letter of the set can be found here
> <URL:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20250704075225.3212486-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>.
> 
> In brief, this patch depends on PM runtime patches adding marking the last
> busy timestamp in autosuspend related functions. The patches are here, on
> rc2:
> 

You did not send cover letter to people, so this changelog should
explain what I should do with this patch (what is the merging/dependency).

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Hi Krzysztof,

On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 10:03:27AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/07/2025 09:54, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(),
> > pm_runtime_autosuspend() and pm_request_autosuspend() now include a call
> > to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). Remove the now-reduntant explicit call to
> > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > The cover letter of the set can be found here
> > <URL:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20250704075225.3212486-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>.
> > 
> > In brief, this patch depends on PM runtime patches adding marking the last
> > busy timestamp in autosuspend related functions. The patches are here, on
> > rc2:
> > 
> 
> You did not send cover letter to people, so this changelog should
> explain what I should do with this patch (what is the merging/dependency).

I didn't as it would have had too many recipients (more than 200 in fact).
As you may have noticed, the URL for the cover letter is a few lines above,
also its Message-ID can be found in the In-reply-to: header.

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus