fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
In do_procmap_query(), we are allocating name_buf as much as name_buf_sz
with kmalloc().
However, due to the previous commit eff061546ca5
("mm/maps: execute PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl under per-vma locks"),
the location of kmalloc() is located inside the RCU critical section.
This causes might_sleep_if() to be called inside the RCU critical section,
so we need to move the call location of kmalloc() outside the RCU critical
section to prevent this.
Reported-by: syzbot+6246a83e7bd9f8a3e239@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=6246a83e7bd9f8a3e239
Fixes: eff061546ca5 ("mm/maps: execute PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl under per-vma locks")
Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@gmail.com>
---
fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index f3659046efb7..42b0224c6ac9 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -595,6 +595,7 @@ static int do_procmap_query(struct proc_maps_private *priv, void __user *uarg)
char build_id_buf[BUILD_ID_SIZE_MAX], *name_buf = NULL;
__u64 usize;
int err;
+ size_t name_buf_sz;
if (copy_from_user(&usize, (void __user *)uarg, sizeof(usize)))
return -EFAULT;
@@ -621,12 +622,18 @@ static int do_procmap_query(struct proc_maps_private *priv, void __user *uarg)
if (!mm || !mmget_not_zero(mm))
return -ESRCH;
- err = query_vma_setup(priv);
- if (err) {
+ name_buf_sz = min_t(size_t, PATH_MAX, karg.vma_name_size);
+
+ name_buf = kmalloc(name_buf_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!name_buf) {
mmput(mm);
- return err;
+ return -ENOMEM;
}
+ err = query_vma_setup(priv);
+ if (err)
+ goto fail_vma_setup;
+
vma = query_matching_vma(priv, karg.query_addr, karg.query_flags);
if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
err = PTR_ERR(vma);
@@ -679,20 +686,12 @@ static int do_procmap_query(struct proc_maps_private *priv, void __user *uarg)
}
if (karg.vma_name_size) {
- size_t name_buf_sz = min_t(size_t, PATH_MAX, karg.vma_name_size);
const struct path *path;
const char *name_fmt;
size_t name_sz = 0;
get_vma_name(vma, &path, &name, &name_fmt);
- if (path || name_fmt || name) {
- name_buf = kmalloc(name_buf_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!name_buf) {
- err = -ENOMEM;
- goto out;
- }
- }
if (path) {
name = d_path(path, name_buf, name_buf_sz);
if (IS_ERR(name)) {
@@ -733,6 +732,7 @@ static int do_procmap_query(struct proc_maps_private *priv, void __user *uarg)
out:
query_vma_teardown(priv);
+fail_vma_setup:
mmput(mm);
kfree(name_buf);
return err;
--
On 02.07.25 15:53, Jeongjun Park wrote: > In do_procmap_query(), we are allocating name_buf as much as name_buf_sz > with kmalloc(). > > However, due to the previous commit eff061546ca5 > ("mm/maps: execute PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl under per-vma locks"), > the location of kmalloc() is located inside the RCU critical section. > > This causes might_sleep_if() to be called inside the RCU critical section, > so we need to move the call location of kmalloc() outside the RCU critical > section to prevent this. > > Reported-by: syzbot+6246a83e7bd9f8a3e239@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=6246a83e7bd9f8a3e239 > Fixes: eff061546ca5 ("mm/maps: execute PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl under per-vma locks") That commit is not upstream yet (and the commit id is not stable), so it should be squashed into the problematic commit. As a side note: the patch subject of this and the original patch should start with "fs/proc/task_mmu", not "mm/maps". -- Cheers, David / dhildenb
On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 7:44 AM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 02.07.25 15:53, Jeongjun Park wrote: > > In do_procmap_query(), we are allocating name_buf as much as name_buf_sz > > with kmalloc(). > > > > However, due to the previous commit eff061546ca5 > > ("mm/maps: execute PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl under per-vma locks"), > > the location of kmalloc() is located inside the RCU critical section. > > > > This causes might_sleep_if() to be called inside the RCU critical section, > > so we need to move the call location of kmalloc() outside the RCU critical > > section to prevent this. > > > > Reported-by: syzbot+6246a83e7bd9f8a3e239@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=6246a83e7bd9f8a3e239 > > Fixes: eff061546ca5 ("mm/maps: execute PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl under per-vma locks") > > That commit is not upstream yet (and the commit id is not stable), so it > should be squashed into the problematic commit. > > As a side note: the patch subject of this and the original patch should > start with "fs/proc/task_mmu", not "mm/maps". Thanks for the fix Jeongjun and thanks for the note David. I'm preparing the next version of my patchset and there is a much simpler fix for this issue which I'll implement there. Planning to post it tomorrow. Thanks, Suren. > > -- > Cheers, > > David / dhildenb >
On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 4:34 PM Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 7:44 AM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On 02.07.25 15:53, Jeongjun Park wrote: > > > In do_procmap_query(), we are allocating name_buf as much as name_buf_sz > > > with kmalloc(). > > > > > > However, due to the previous commit eff061546ca5 > > > ("mm/maps: execute PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl under per-vma locks"), > > > the location of kmalloc() is located inside the RCU critical section. > > > > > > This causes might_sleep_if() to be called inside the RCU critical section, > > > so we need to move the call location of kmalloc() outside the RCU critical > > > section to prevent this. > > > > > > Reported-by: syzbot+6246a83e7bd9f8a3e239@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=6246a83e7bd9f8a3e239 > > > Fixes: eff061546ca5 ("mm/maps: execute PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl under per-vma locks") > > > > That commit is not upstream yet (and the commit id is not stable), so it > > should be squashed into the problematic commit. > > > > As a side note: the patch subject of this and the original patch should > > start with "fs/proc/task_mmu", not "mm/maps". > > Thanks for the fix Jeongjun and thanks for the note David. > I'm preparing the next version of my patchset and there is a much > simpler fix for this issue which I'll implement there. Planning to > post it tomorrow. v6 of my patchset is posted at https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250704060727.724817-1-surenb@google.com/ I reworked the last patch to address this issue by narrowing down the rcu read section to query_vma_find_by_addr() only. That should fix the original issue. > Thanks, > Suren. > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > > > David / dhildenb > >
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.