From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Pass the OEN pin names via the SoC-specific hardware configuration
structure to allow reuse of rzv2h_oen_read() and rzv2h_oen_write()
on multiple SoCs.
On the RZ/V2H(P) and RZ/G3E SoCs, the PFC_OEN register is located at the
same offset. However, the register controls different pins on each SoC.
Hardcoding the pin names in the common logic prevents reusability.
Extend struct rzg2l_hwcfg to include an array of OEN pin names and its
length. Use these values in rzv2h_pin_to_oen_bit() to determine the bit
position dynamically based on the active SoC.
This enables shared handling of OEN register access while accounting for
SoC-specific pin mappings.
Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
---
Changes:
v4: new patch
drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
index 78fa08ff0faa..792ca70bd9d1 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
@@ -257,6 +257,8 @@ enum rzg2l_iolh_index {
* @func_base: base number for port function (see register PFC)
* @oen_max_pin: the maximum pin number supporting output enable
* @oen_max_port: the maximum port number supporting output enable
+ * @oen_pin_names: array of pin names for output enable
+ * @oen_pin_names_len: length of the oen_pin_names array
*/
struct rzg2l_hwcfg {
const struct rzg2l_register_offsets regs;
@@ -269,6 +271,8 @@ struct rzg2l_hwcfg {
u8 func_base;
u8 oen_max_pin;
u8 oen_max_port;
+ const char * const *oen_pin_names;
+ u8 oen_pin_names_len;
};
struct rzg2l_dedicated_configs {
@@ -1213,14 +1217,11 @@ static int rzv2h_bias_param_to_hw(enum pin_config_param param)
static u8 rzv2h_pin_to_oen_bit(struct rzg2l_pinctrl *pctrl, unsigned int _pin)
{
- static const char * const pin_names[] = { "ET0_TXC_TXCLK", "ET1_TXC_TXCLK",
- "XSPI0_RESET0N", "XSPI0_CS0N",
- "XSPI0_CKN", "XSPI0_CKP" };
const struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pin_desc = &pctrl->desc.pins[_pin];
unsigned int i;
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pin_names); i++) {
- if (!strcmp(pin_desc->name, pin_names[i]))
+ for (i = 0; i < pctrl->data->hwcfg->oen_pin_names_len; i++) {
+ if (!strcmp(pin_desc->name, pctrl->data->hwcfg->oen_pin_names[i]))
return i;
}
@@ -3277,11 +3278,18 @@ static const struct rzg2l_hwcfg rzg3s_hwcfg = {
.oen_max_port = 7, /* P7_1 is the maximum OEN port. */
};
+static const char * const rzv2h_oen_pin_names[] = {
+ "ET0_TXC_TXCLK", "ET1_TXC_TXCLK", "XSPI0_RESET0N", "XSPI0_CS0N",
+ "XSPI0_CKN", "XSPI0_CKP"
+};
+
static const struct rzg2l_hwcfg rzv2h_hwcfg = {
.regs = {
.pwpr = 0x3c04,
},
.tint_start_index = 17,
+ .oen_pin_names = rzv2h_oen_pin_names,
+ .oen_pin_names_len = ARRAY_SIZE(rzv2h_oen_pin_names),
};
static struct rzg2l_pinctrl_data r9a07g043_data = {
--
2.25.1
Hi John, Prabhakar, On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 at 02:57, John Madieu <john.madieu.xa@bp.renesas.com> wrote: > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > Pass the OEN pin names via the SoC-specific hardware configuration > structure to allow reuse of rzv2h_oen_read() and rzv2h_oen_write() > on multiple SoCs. > > On the RZ/V2H(P) and RZ/G3E SoCs, the PFC_OEN register is located at the > same offset. However, the register controls different pins on each SoC. > Hardcoding the pin names in the common logic prevents reusability. > > Extend struct rzg2l_hwcfg to include an array of OEN pin names and its > length. Use these values in rzv2h_pin_to_oen_bit() to determine the bit > position dynamically based on the active SoC. > > This enables shared handling of OEN register access while accounting for > SoC-specific pin mappings. > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> Thanks for your patch! > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c > @@ -257,6 +257,8 @@ enum rzg2l_iolh_index { > * @func_base: base number for port function (see register PFC) > * @oen_max_pin: the maximum pin number supporting output enable > * @oen_max_port: the maximum port number supporting output enable > + * @oen_pin_names: array of pin names for output enable > + * @oen_pin_names_len: length of the oen_pin_names array > */ > struct rzg2l_hwcfg { > const struct rzg2l_register_offsets regs; > @@ -269,6 +271,8 @@ struct rzg2l_hwcfg { > u8 func_base; > u8 oen_max_pin; > u8 oen_max_port; > + const char * const *oen_pin_names; > + u8 oen_pin_names_len; Please exchange the order of the members, so the u8 fits in the existing hole. However, I think you better drop this patch, and use the existing rzg2l_pinctrl_data.oen_{read,write]() abstraction instead. > }; Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
Hi Geert, Thank you for the review. On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 10:54 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > Hi John, Prabhakar, > > On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 at 02:57, John Madieu <john.madieu.xa@bp.renesas.com> wrote: > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > > > Pass the OEN pin names via the SoC-specific hardware configuration > > structure to allow reuse of rzv2h_oen_read() and rzv2h_oen_write() > > on multiple SoCs. > > > > On the RZ/V2H(P) and RZ/G3E SoCs, the PFC_OEN register is located at the > > same offset. However, the register controls different pins on each SoC. > > Hardcoding the pin names in the common logic prevents reusability. > > > > Extend struct rzg2l_hwcfg to include an array of OEN pin names and its > > length. Use these values in rzv2h_pin_to_oen_bit() to determine the bit > > position dynamically based on the active SoC. > > > > This enables shared handling of OEN register access while accounting for > > SoC-specific pin mappings. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > Thanks for your patch! > > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c > > @@ -257,6 +257,8 @@ enum rzg2l_iolh_index { > > * @func_base: base number for port function (see register PFC) > > * @oen_max_pin: the maximum pin number supporting output enable > > * @oen_max_port: the maximum port number supporting output enable > > + * @oen_pin_names: array of pin names for output enable > > + * @oen_pin_names_len: length of the oen_pin_names array > > */ > > struct rzg2l_hwcfg { > > const struct rzg2l_register_offsets regs; > > @@ -269,6 +271,8 @@ struct rzg2l_hwcfg { > > u8 func_base; > > u8 oen_max_pin; > > u8 oen_max_port; > > + const char * const *oen_pin_names; > > + u8 oen_pin_names_len; > > Please exchange the order of the members, so the u8 fits in the > existing hole. > OK. > However, I think you better drop this patch, and use the existing > rzg2l_pinctrl_data.oen_{read,write]() abstraction instead. > Ok agreed, I will switch to that. Cheers, Prabhakar
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.