Drop the drm_panel field of the mchp_lvds struct as it is unused.
Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@microchip.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
index 9f4ff82bc6b4..42751124b868 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
#include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
#include <drm/drm_bridge.h>
#include <drm/drm_of.h>
-#include <drm/drm_panel.h>
#include <drm/drm_print.h>
#include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h>
#include <drm/drm_simple_kms_helper.h>
@@ -56,7 +55,6 @@ struct mchp_lvds {
struct device *dev;
void __iomem *regs;
struct clk *pclk;
- struct drm_panel *panel;
struct drm_bridge bridge;
struct drm_bridge *panel_bridge;
};
@@ -179,13 +177,8 @@ static int mchp_lvds_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
"can't find port point, please init lvds panel port!\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
-
- lvds->panel = of_drm_find_panel(port);
of_node_put(port);
- if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel))
- return -EPROBE_DEFER;
-
lvds->panel_bridge = devm_drm_of_get_bridge(dev, dev->of_node, 1, 0);
if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel_bridge))
--
2.43.0
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 02:54:14PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote: > Drop the drm_panel field of the mchp_lvds struct as it is unused. > > Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@microchip.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c | 7 ------- > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c > index 9f4ff82bc6b4..42751124b868 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c > @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ > #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h> > #include <drm/drm_bridge.h> > #include <drm/drm_of.h> > -#include <drm/drm_panel.h> > #include <drm/drm_print.h> > #include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h> > #include <drm/drm_simple_kms_helper.h> > @@ -56,7 +55,6 @@ struct mchp_lvds { > struct device *dev; > void __iomem *regs; > struct clk *pclk; > - struct drm_panel *panel; > struct drm_bridge bridge; > struct drm_bridge *panel_bridge; > }; > @@ -179,13 +177,8 @@ static int mchp_lvds_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > "can't find port point, please init lvds panel port!\n"); > return -ENODEV; > } The above code seems unneeded now, I think you can drop it too. > - > - lvds->panel = of_drm_find_panel(port); > of_node_put(port); > > - if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel)) > - return -EPROBE_DEFER; > - > lvds->panel_bridge = devm_drm_of_get_bridge(dev, dev->of_node, 1, 0); > > if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel_bridge)) -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
On 24/06/25 4:12 pm, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 02:54:14PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote: >> Drop the drm_panel field of the mchp_lvds struct as it is unused. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@microchip.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c | 7 ------- >> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c >> index 9f4ff82bc6b4..42751124b868 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c >> @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ >> #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h> >> #include <drm/drm_bridge.h> >> #include <drm/drm_of.h> >> -#include <drm/drm_panel.h> >> #include <drm/drm_print.h> >> #include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h> >> #include <drm/drm_simple_kms_helper.h> >> @@ -56,7 +55,6 @@ struct mchp_lvds { >> struct device *dev; >> void __iomem *regs; >> struct clk *pclk; >> - struct drm_panel *panel; >> struct drm_bridge bridge; >> struct drm_bridge *panel_bridge; >> }; >> @@ -179,13 +177,8 @@ static int mchp_lvds_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> "can't find port point, please init lvds panel port!\n"); >> return -ENODEV; >> } > > The above code seems unneeded now, I think you can drop it too. Yes, I considered removing it as well. However, I was wondering if it might still be valuable to return early when the endpoint isn't found, to clearly indicate that the panel port is missing. > >> - >> - lvds->panel = of_drm_find_panel(port); >> of_node_put(port); >> >> - if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel)) >> - return -EPROBE_DEFER; >> - >> lvds->panel_bridge = devm_drm_of_get_bridge(dev, dev->of_node, 1, 0); >> >> if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel_bridge)) > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart -- With Best Regards, Dharma B.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 10:46:26AM +0000, Dharma.B@microchip.com wrote: > On 24/06/25 4:12 pm, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 02:54:14PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote: > >> Drop the drm_panel field of the mchp_lvds struct as it is unused. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@microchip.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c | 7 ------- > >> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c > >> index 9f4ff82bc6b4..42751124b868 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c > >> @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ > >> #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h> > >> #include <drm/drm_bridge.h> > >> #include <drm/drm_of.h> > >> -#include <drm/drm_panel.h> > >> #include <drm/drm_print.h> > >> #include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h> > >> #include <drm/drm_simple_kms_helper.h> > >> @@ -56,7 +55,6 @@ struct mchp_lvds { > >> struct device *dev; > >> void __iomem *regs; > >> struct clk *pclk; > >> - struct drm_panel *panel; > >> struct drm_bridge bridge; > >> struct drm_bridge *panel_bridge; > >> }; > >> @@ -179,13 +177,8 @@ static int mchp_lvds_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> "can't find port point, please init lvds panel port!\n"); > >> return -ENODEV; > >> } > > > > The above code seems unneeded now, I think you can drop it too. > > Yes, I considered removing it as well. However, I was wondering if it > might still be valuable to return early when the endpoint isn't found, > to clearly indicate that the panel port is missing. That error is covered by the devm_drm_of_get_bridge() call below, so I think you can drop the code above. > >> - > >> - lvds->panel = of_drm_find_panel(port); > >> of_node_put(port); > >> > >> - if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel)) > >> - return -EPROBE_DEFER; > >> - > >> lvds->panel_bridge = devm_drm_of_get_bridge(dev, dev->of_node, 1, 0); > >> > >> if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel_bridge)) -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
On 24/06/25 4:20 pm, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 10:46:26AM +0000, Dharma.B@microchip.com wrote: >> On 24/06/25 4:12 pm, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 02:54:14PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote: >>>> Drop the drm_panel field of the mchp_lvds struct as it is unused. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@microchip.com> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c | 7 ------- >>>> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c >>>> index 9f4ff82bc6b4..42751124b868 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c >>>> @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ >>>> #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h> >>>> #include <drm/drm_bridge.h> >>>> #include <drm/drm_of.h> >>>> -#include <drm/drm_panel.h> >>>> #include <drm/drm_print.h> >>>> #include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h> >>>> #include <drm/drm_simple_kms_helper.h> >>>> @@ -56,7 +55,6 @@ struct mchp_lvds { >>>> struct device *dev; >>>> void __iomem *regs; >>>> struct clk *pclk; >>>> - struct drm_panel *panel; >>>> struct drm_bridge bridge; >>>> struct drm_bridge *panel_bridge; >>>> }; >>>> @@ -179,13 +177,8 @@ static int mchp_lvds_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>>> "can't find port point, please init lvds panel port!\n"); >>>> return -ENODEV; >>>> } >>> >>> The above code seems unneeded now, I think you can drop it too. >> >> Yes, I considered removing it as well. However, I was wondering if it >> might still be valuable to return early when the endpoint isn't found, >> to clearly indicate that the panel port is missing. > > That error is covered by the devm_drm_of_get_bridge() call below, so I > think you can drop the code above. Sure, I will drop the device node "port" as well. > >>>> - >>>> - lvds->panel = of_drm_find_panel(port); >>>> of_node_put(port); >>>> >>>> - if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel)) >>>> - return -EPROBE_DEFER; >>>> - >>>> lvds->panel_bridge = devm_drm_of_get_bridge(dev, dev->of_node, 1, 0); >>>> >>>> if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel_bridge)) > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart -- With Best Regards, Dharma B.
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.