Drop the drm_panel field of the mchp_lvds struct as it is unused.
Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@microchip.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
index 9f4ff82bc6b4..42751124b868 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
#include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
#include <drm/drm_bridge.h>
#include <drm/drm_of.h>
-#include <drm/drm_panel.h>
#include <drm/drm_print.h>
#include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h>
#include <drm/drm_simple_kms_helper.h>
@@ -56,7 +55,6 @@ struct mchp_lvds {
struct device *dev;
void __iomem *regs;
struct clk *pclk;
- struct drm_panel *panel;
struct drm_bridge bridge;
struct drm_bridge *panel_bridge;
};
@@ -179,13 +177,8 @@ static int mchp_lvds_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
"can't find port point, please init lvds panel port!\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
-
- lvds->panel = of_drm_find_panel(port);
of_node_put(port);
- if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel))
- return -EPROBE_DEFER;
-
lvds->panel_bridge = devm_drm_of_get_bridge(dev, dev->of_node, 1, 0);
if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel_bridge))
--
2.43.0
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 02:54:14PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
> Drop the drm_panel field of the mchp_lvds struct as it is unused.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@microchip.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c | 7 -------
> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
> index 9f4ff82bc6b4..42751124b868 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
> #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
> #include <drm/drm_bridge.h>
> #include <drm/drm_of.h>
> -#include <drm/drm_panel.h>
> #include <drm/drm_print.h>
> #include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h>
> #include <drm/drm_simple_kms_helper.h>
> @@ -56,7 +55,6 @@ struct mchp_lvds {
> struct device *dev;
> void __iomem *regs;
> struct clk *pclk;
> - struct drm_panel *panel;
> struct drm_bridge bridge;
> struct drm_bridge *panel_bridge;
> };
> @@ -179,13 +177,8 @@ static int mchp_lvds_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> "can't find port point, please init lvds panel port!\n");
> return -ENODEV;
> }
The above code seems unneeded now, I think you can drop it too.
> -
> - lvds->panel = of_drm_find_panel(port);
> of_node_put(port);
>
> - if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel))
> - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> -
> lvds->panel_bridge = devm_drm_of_get_bridge(dev, dev->of_node, 1, 0);
>
> if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel_bridge))
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
On 24/06/25 4:12 pm, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 02:54:14PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
>> Drop the drm_panel field of the mchp_lvds struct as it is unused.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@microchip.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c | 7 -------
>> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
>> index 9f4ff82bc6b4..42751124b868 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
>> @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
>> #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
>> #include <drm/drm_bridge.h>
>> #include <drm/drm_of.h>
>> -#include <drm/drm_panel.h>
>> #include <drm/drm_print.h>
>> #include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h>
>> #include <drm/drm_simple_kms_helper.h>
>> @@ -56,7 +55,6 @@ struct mchp_lvds {
>> struct device *dev;
>> void __iomem *regs;
>> struct clk *pclk;
>> - struct drm_panel *panel;
>> struct drm_bridge bridge;
>> struct drm_bridge *panel_bridge;
>> };
>> @@ -179,13 +177,8 @@ static int mchp_lvds_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> "can't find port point, please init lvds panel port!\n");
>> return -ENODEV;
>> }
>
> The above code seems unneeded now, I think you can drop it too.
Yes, I considered removing it as well. However, I was wondering if it
might still be valuable to return early when the endpoint isn't found,
to clearly indicate that the panel port is missing.
>
>> -
>> - lvds->panel = of_drm_find_panel(port);
>> of_node_put(port);
>>
>> - if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel))
>> - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> -
>> lvds->panel_bridge = devm_drm_of_get_bridge(dev, dev->of_node, 1, 0);
>>
>> if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel_bridge))
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
--
With Best Regards,
Dharma B.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 10:46:26AM +0000, Dharma.B@microchip.com wrote:
> On 24/06/25 4:12 pm, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 02:54:14PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
> >> Drop the drm_panel field of the mchp_lvds struct as it is unused.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@microchip.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c | 7 -------
> >> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
> >> index 9f4ff82bc6b4..42751124b868 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
> >> @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
> >> #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
> >> #include <drm/drm_bridge.h>
> >> #include <drm/drm_of.h>
> >> -#include <drm/drm_panel.h>
> >> #include <drm/drm_print.h>
> >> #include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h>
> >> #include <drm/drm_simple_kms_helper.h>
> >> @@ -56,7 +55,6 @@ struct mchp_lvds {
> >> struct device *dev;
> >> void __iomem *regs;
> >> struct clk *pclk;
> >> - struct drm_panel *panel;
> >> struct drm_bridge bridge;
> >> struct drm_bridge *panel_bridge;
> >> };
> >> @@ -179,13 +177,8 @@ static int mchp_lvds_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> "can't find port point, please init lvds panel port!\n");
> >> return -ENODEV;
> >> }
> >
> > The above code seems unneeded now, I think you can drop it too.
>
> Yes, I considered removing it as well. However, I was wondering if it
> might still be valuable to return early when the endpoint isn't found,
> to clearly indicate that the panel port is missing.
That error is covered by the devm_drm_of_get_bridge() call below, so I
think you can drop the code above.
> >> -
> >> - lvds->panel = of_drm_find_panel(port);
> >> of_node_put(port);
> >>
> >> - if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel))
> >> - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> >> -
> >> lvds->panel_bridge = devm_drm_of_get_bridge(dev, dev->of_node, 1, 0);
> >>
> >> if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel_bridge))
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
On 24/06/25 4:20 pm, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 10:46:26AM +0000, Dharma.B@microchip.com wrote:
>> On 24/06/25 4:12 pm, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 02:54:14PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
>>>> Drop the drm_panel field of the mchp_lvds struct as it is unused.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@microchip.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c | 7 -------
>>>> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
>>>> index 9f4ff82bc6b4..42751124b868 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
>>>> @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
>>>> #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
>>>> #include <drm/drm_bridge.h>
>>>> #include <drm/drm_of.h>
>>>> -#include <drm/drm_panel.h>
>>>> #include <drm/drm_print.h>
>>>> #include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h>
>>>> #include <drm/drm_simple_kms_helper.h>
>>>> @@ -56,7 +55,6 @@ struct mchp_lvds {
>>>> struct device *dev;
>>>> void __iomem *regs;
>>>> struct clk *pclk;
>>>> - struct drm_panel *panel;
>>>> struct drm_bridge bridge;
>>>> struct drm_bridge *panel_bridge;
>>>> };
>>>> @@ -179,13 +177,8 @@ static int mchp_lvds_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> "can't find port point, please init lvds panel port!\n");
>>>> return -ENODEV;
>>>> }
>>>
>>> The above code seems unneeded now, I think you can drop it too.
>>
>> Yes, I considered removing it as well. However, I was wondering if it
>> might still be valuable to return early when the endpoint isn't found,
>> to clearly indicate that the panel port is missing.
>
> That error is covered by the devm_drm_of_get_bridge() call below, so I
> think you can drop the code above.
Sure, I will drop the device node "port" as well.
>
>>>> -
>>>> - lvds->panel = of_drm_find_panel(port);
>>>> of_node_put(port);
>>>>
>>>> - if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel))
>>>> - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>>> -
>>>> lvds->panel_bridge = devm_drm_of_get_bridge(dev, dev->of_node, 1, 0);
>>>>
>>>> if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel_bridge))
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
--
With Best Regards,
Dharma B.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.