From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Replace struct bgpio_pdata - that we plan to remove - with software
nodes containing properties encoding the same values thatr can now be
parsed by gpio-mmio.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c b/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c
index ef03d6cec9ff6927668d051ca459eb1d8ff7269e..fc2daffc4352cca763cefbf6e17bdd5242290198 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/property.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/stat.h>
@@ -37,22 +38,34 @@
/* The sysreg block is just a random collection of various functions... */
-static struct bgpio_pdata vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_pdata = {
- .label = "sys_led",
- .base = -1,
- .ngpio = 8,
+static const struct property_entry vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_props[] = {
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("label", "sys_led"),
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("ngpios", 8),
+ { }
};
-static struct bgpio_pdata vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_pdata = {
- .label = "sys_mci",
- .base = -1,
- .ngpio = 2,
+static const struct software_node vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_swnode = {
+ .properties = vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_props,
};
-static struct bgpio_pdata vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_pdata = {
- .label = "sys_flash",
- .base = -1,
- .ngpio = 1,
+static const struct property_entry vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_props[] = {
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("label", "sys_mci"),
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("ngpios", 2),
+ { }
+};
+
+static const struct software_node vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_swnode = {
+ .properties = vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_props,
+};
+
+static const struct property_entry vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_props[] = {
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("label", "sys_flash"),
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("ngpios", 1),
+ { }
+};
+
+static const struct software_node vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_swnode = {
+ .properties = vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_props,
};
static struct mfd_cell vexpress_sysreg_cells[] = {
@@ -61,22 +74,19 @@ static struct mfd_cell vexpress_sysreg_cells[] = {
.of_compatible = "arm,vexpress-sysreg,sys_led",
.num_resources = 1,
.resources = &DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED(SYS_LED, 0x4, "dat"),
- .platform_data = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_pdata,
- .pdata_size = sizeof(vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_pdata),
+ .swnode = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_swnode,
}, {
.name = "basic-mmio-gpio",
.of_compatible = "arm,vexpress-sysreg,sys_mci",
.num_resources = 1,
.resources = &DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED(SYS_MCI, 0x4, "dat"),
- .platform_data = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_pdata,
- .pdata_size = sizeof(vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_pdata),
+ .swnode = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_swnode,
}, {
.name = "basic-mmio-gpio",
.of_compatible = "arm,vexpress-sysreg,sys_flash",
.num_resources = 1,
.resources = &DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED(SYS_FLASH, 0x4, "dat"),
- .platform_data = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_pdata,
- .pdata_size = sizeof(vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_pdata),
+ .swnode = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_swnode,
}, {
.name = "vexpress-syscfg",
.num_resources = 1,
--
2.48.1
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 03:19:14PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > Replace struct bgpio_pdata - that we plan to remove - with software > nodes containing properties encoding the same values thatr can now be > parsed by gpio-mmio. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com> I'm OK with this going through the GPIO tree. Best regards, Liviu > --- > drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c b/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c > index ef03d6cec9ff6927668d051ca459eb1d8ff7269e..fc2daffc4352cca763cefbf6e17bdd5242290198 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > #include <linux/module.h> > #include <linux/of_platform.h> > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > +#include <linux/property.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > #include <linux/stat.h> > > @@ -37,22 +38,34 @@ > > /* The sysreg block is just a random collection of various functions... */ > > -static struct bgpio_pdata vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_pdata = { > - .label = "sys_led", > - .base = -1, > - .ngpio = 8, > +static const struct property_entry vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_props[] = { > + PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("label", "sys_led"), > + PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("ngpios", 8), > + { } > }; > > -static struct bgpio_pdata vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_pdata = { > - .label = "sys_mci", > - .base = -1, > - .ngpio = 2, > +static const struct software_node vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_swnode = { > + .properties = vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_props, > }; > > -static struct bgpio_pdata vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_pdata = { > - .label = "sys_flash", > - .base = -1, > - .ngpio = 1, > +static const struct property_entry vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_props[] = { > + PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("label", "sys_mci"), > + PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("ngpios", 2), > + { } > +}; > + > +static const struct software_node vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_swnode = { > + .properties = vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_props, > +}; > + > +static const struct property_entry vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_props[] = { > + PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("label", "sys_flash"), > + PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("ngpios", 1), > + { } > +}; > + > +static const struct software_node vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_swnode = { > + .properties = vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_props, > }; > > static struct mfd_cell vexpress_sysreg_cells[] = { > @@ -61,22 +74,19 @@ static struct mfd_cell vexpress_sysreg_cells[] = { > .of_compatible = "arm,vexpress-sysreg,sys_led", > .num_resources = 1, > .resources = &DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED(SYS_LED, 0x4, "dat"), > - .platform_data = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_pdata, > - .pdata_size = sizeof(vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_pdata), > + .swnode = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_swnode, > }, { > .name = "basic-mmio-gpio", > .of_compatible = "arm,vexpress-sysreg,sys_mci", > .num_resources = 1, > .resources = &DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED(SYS_MCI, 0x4, "dat"), > - .platform_data = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_pdata, > - .pdata_size = sizeof(vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_pdata), > + .swnode = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_swnode, > }, { > .name = "basic-mmio-gpio", > .of_compatible = "arm,vexpress-sysreg,sys_flash", > .num_resources = 1, > .resources = &DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED(SYS_FLASH, 0x4, "dat"), > - .platform_data = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_pdata, > - .pdata_size = sizeof(vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_pdata), > + .swnode = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_swnode, > }, { > .name = "vexpress-syscfg", > .num_resources = 1, > > -- > 2.48.1 > -- ==================== | I would like to | | fix the world, | | but they're not | | giving me the | \ source code! / --------------- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > Replace struct bgpio_pdata - that we plan to remove - with software > nodes containing properties encoding the same values thatr can now be Spelling. > parsed by gpio-mmio. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) Can this go in on its own, or does it have depend{encies,ants}? -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:23 PM Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2025, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > > > Replace struct bgpio_pdata - that we plan to remove - with software > > nodes containing properties encoding the same values thatr can now be > > Spelling. > > > parsed by gpio-mmio. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > --- > > drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > Can this go in on its own, or does it have depend{encies,ants}? It will break the MFD GPIO sub-driver without patch 1/6 from this series. It would be best if you could Ack it and I can set up an immutable branch for v6.17 if you need it. Bartosz
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:23 PM Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2025, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > > > > > Replace struct bgpio_pdata - that we plan to remove - with software > > > nodes containing properties encoding the same values thatr can now be > > > > Spelling. > > > > > parsed by gpio-mmio. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > > --- > > > drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > > > Can this go in on its own, or does it have depend{encies,ants}? > > It will break the MFD GPIO sub-driver without patch 1/6 from this > series. It would be best if you could Ack it and I can set up an > immutable branch for v6.17 if you need it. Yes please. Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 3:19 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > Replace struct bgpio_pdata - that we plan to remove - with software > nodes containing properties encoding the same values thatr can now be > parsed by gpio-mmio. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> Neat! Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Yours, Linus Walleij
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.