From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Replace struct bgpio_pdata - that we plan to remove - with software
nodes containing properties encoding the same values thatr can now be
parsed by gpio-mmio.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c b/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c
index ef03d6cec9ff6927668d051ca459eb1d8ff7269e..fc2daffc4352cca763cefbf6e17bdd5242290198 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/property.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/stat.h>
@@ -37,22 +38,34 @@
/* The sysreg block is just a random collection of various functions... */
-static struct bgpio_pdata vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_pdata = {
- .label = "sys_led",
- .base = -1,
- .ngpio = 8,
+static const struct property_entry vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_props[] = {
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("label", "sys_led"),
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("ngpios", 8),
+ { }
};
-static struct bgpio_pdata vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_pdata = {
- .label = "sys_mci",
- .base = -1,
- .ngpio = 2,
+static const struct software_node vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_swnode = {
+ .properties = vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_props,
};
-static struct bgpio_pdata vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_pdata = {
- .label = "sys_flash",
- .base = -1,
- .ngpio = 1,
+static const struct property_entry vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_props[] = {
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("label", "sys_mci"),
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("ngpios", 2),
+ { }
+};
+
+static const struct software_node vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_swnode = {
+ .properties = vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_props,
+};
+
+static const struct property_entry vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_props[] = {
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("label", "sys_flash"),
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("ngpios", 1),
+ { }
+};
+
+static const struct software_node vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_swnode = {
+ .properties = vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_props,
};
static struct mfd_cell vexpress_sysreg_cells[] = {
@@ -61,22 +74,19 @@ static struct mfd_cell vexpress_sysreg_cells[] = {
.of_compatible = "arm,vexpress-sysreg,sys_led",
.num_resources = 1,
.resources = &DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED(SYS_LED, 0x4, "dat"),
- .platform_data = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_pdata,
- .pdata_size = sizeof(vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_pdata),
+ .swnode = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_swnode,
}, {
.name = "basic-mmio-gpio",
.of_compatible = "arm,vexpress-sysreg,sys_mci",
.num_resources = 1,
.resources = &DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED(SYS_MCI, 0x4, "dat"),
- .platform_data = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_pdata,
- .pdata_size = sizeof(vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_pdata),
+ .swnode = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_swnode,
}, {
.name = "basic-mmio-gpio",
.of_compatible = "arm,vexpress-sysreg,sys_flash",
.num_resources = 1,
.resources = &DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED(SYS_FLASH, 0x4, "dat"),
- .platform_data = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_pdata,
- .pdata_size = sizeof(vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_pdata),
+ .swnode = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_swnode,
}, {
.name = "vexpress-syscfg",
.num_resources = 1,
--
2.48.1
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 03:19:14PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
>
> Replace struct bgpio_pdata - that we plan to remove - with software
> nodes containing properties encoding the same values thatr can now be
> parsed by gpio-mmio.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
I'm OK with this going through the GPIO tree.
Best regards,
Liviu
> ---
> drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c b/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c
> index ef03d6cec9ff6927668d051ca459eb1d8ff7269e..fc2daffc4352cca763cefbf6e17bdd5242290198 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/stat.h>
>
> @@ -37,22 +38,34 @@
>
> /* The sysreg block is just a random collection of various functions... */
>
> -static struct bgpio_pdata vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_pdata = {
> - .label = "sys_led",
> - .base = -1,
> - .ngpio = 8,
> +static const struct property_entry vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_props[] = {
> + PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("label", "sys_led"),
> + PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("ngpios", 8),
> + { }
> };
>
> -static struct bgpio_pdata vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_pdata = {
> - .label = "sys_mci",
> - .base = -1,
> - .ngpio = 2,
> +static const struct software_node vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_swnode = {
> + .properties = vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_props,
> };
>
> -static struct bgpio_pdata vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_pdata = {
> - .label = "sys_flash",
> - .base = -1,
> - .ngpio = 1,
> +static const struct property_entry vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_props[] = {
> + PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("label", "sys_mci"),
> + PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("ngpios", 2),
> + { }
> +};
> +
> +static const struct software_node vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_swnode = {
> + .properties = vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_props,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct property_entry vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_props[] = {
> + PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("label", "sys_flash"),
> + PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("ngpios", 1),
> + { }
> +};
> +
> +static const struct software_node vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_swnode = {
> + .properties = vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_props,
> };
>
> static struct mfd_cell vexpress_sysreg_cells[] = {
> @@ -61,22 +74,19 @@ static struct mfd_cell vexpress_sysreg_cells[] = {
> .of_compatible = "arm,vexpress-sysreg,sys_led",
> .num_resources = 1,
> .resources = &DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED(SYS_LED, 0x4, "dat"),
> - .platform_data = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_pdata,
> - .pdata_size = sizeof(vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_pdata),
> + .swnode = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_led_swnode,
> }, {
> .name = "basic-mmio-gpio",
> .of_compatible = "arm,vexpress-sysreg,sys_mci",
> .num_resources = 1,
> .resources = &DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED(SYS_MCI, 0x4, "dat"),
> - .platform_data = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_pdata,
> - .pdata_size = sizeof(vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_pdata),
> + .swnode = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_mci_swnode,
> }, {
> .name = "basic-mmio-gpio",
> .of_compatible = "arm,vexpress-sysreg,sys_flash",
> .num_resources = 1,
> .resources = &DEFINE_RES_MEM_NAMED(SYS_FLASH, 0x4, "dat"),
> - .platform_data = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_pdata,
> - .pdata_size = sizeof(vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_pdata),
> + .swnode = &vexpress_sysreg_sys_flash_swnode,
> }, {
> .name = "vexpress-syscfg",
> .num_resources = 1,
>
> --
> 2.48.1
>
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
>
> Replace struct bgpio_pdata - that we plan to remove - with software
> nodes containing properties encoding the same values thatr can now be
Spelling.
> parsed by gpio-mmio.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Can this go in on its own, or does it have depend{encies,ants}?
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:23 PM Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2025, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> >
> > Replace struct bgpio_pdata - that we plan to remove - with software
> > nodes containing properties encoding the same values thatr can now be
>
> Spelling.
>
> > parsed by gpio-mmio.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> Can this go in on its own, or does it have depend{encies,ants}?
It will break the MFD GPIO sub-driver without patch 1/6 from this
series. It would be best if you could Ack it and I can set up an
immutable branch for v6.17 if you need it.
Bartosz
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:23 PM Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2025, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> >
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> > >
> > > Replace struct bgpio_pdata - that we plan to remove - with software
> > > nodes containing properties encoding the same values thatr can now be
> >
> > Spelling.
> >
> > > parsed by gpio-mmio.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > Can this go in on its own, or does it have depend{encies,ants}?
>
> It will break the MFD GPIO sub-driver without patch 1/6 from this
> series. It would be best if you could Ack it and I can set up an
> immutable branch for v6.17 if you need it.
Yes please.
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 3:19 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > Replace struct bgpio_pdata - that we plan to remove - with software > nodes containing properties encoding the same values thatr can now be > parsed by gpio-mmio. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> Neat! Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Yours, Linus Walleij
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.