Detect the result of starting old governor in cpufreq_set_policy(). If it
fails, exit the governor and clear policy->governor.
Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 7b82ffb50283..2b431845a8a3 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2715,10 +2715,12 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
pr_debug("starting governor %s failed\n", policy->governor->name);
if (old_gov) {
policy->governor = old_gov;
- if (cpufreq_init_governor(policy))
+ if (cpufreq_init_governor(policy)) {
policy->governor = NULL;
- else
- cpufreq_start_governor(policy);
+ } else if (cpufreq_start_governor(policy)) {
+ cpufreq_exit_governor(policy);
+ policy->governor = NULL;
+ }
}
return ret;
--
2.33.0
On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 3:34 PM Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Detect the result of starting old governor in cpufreq_set_policy(). If it
> fails, exit the governor and clear policy->governor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 7b82ffb50283..2b431845a8a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -2715,10 +2715,12 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> pr_debug("starting governor %s failed\n", policy->governor->name);
> if (old_gov) {
> policy->governor = old_gov;
> - if (cpufreq_init_governor(policy))
> + if (cpufreq_init_governor(policy)) {
> policy->governor = NULL;
> - else
> - cpufreq_start_governor(policy);
> + } else if (cpufreq_start_governor(policy)) {
> + cpufreq_exit_governor(policy);
This may introduce a governor module reference imbalance AFAICS.
> + policy->governor = NULL;
> + }
> }
>
> return ret;
> --
On 2025/6/23 23:12, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 3:34 PM Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> Detect the result of starting old governor in cpufreq_set_policy(). If it
>> fails, exit the governor and clear policy->governor.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 8 +++++---
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> index 7b82ffb50283..2b431845a8a3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> @@ -2715,10 +2715,12 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>> pr_debug("starting governor %s failed\n", policy->governor->name);
>> if (old_gov) {
>> policy->governor = old_gov;
>> - if (cpufreq_init_governor(policy))
>> + if (cpufreq_init_governor(policy)) {
>> policy->governor = NULL;
>> - else
>> - cpufreq_start_governor(policy);
>> + } else if (cpufreq_start_governor(policy)) {
>> + cpufreq_exit_governor(policy);
>
> This may introduce a governor module reference imbalance AFAICS.
Sorry, I don't really understand this. Could you explain more? Thanks.
>
>> + policy->governor = NULL;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> return ret;
>> --
>
On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 11:38 AM zhenglifeng (A) <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On 2025/6/23 23:12, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 3:34 PM Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Detect the result of starting old governor in cpufreq_set_policy(). If it
> >> fails, exit the governor and clear policy->governor.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 8 +++++---
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> >> index 7b82ffb50283..2b431845a8a3 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> >> @@ -2715,10 +2715,12 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> >> pr_debug("starting governor %s failed\n", policy->governor->name);
> >> if (old_gov) {
> >> policy->governor = old_gov;
> >> - if (cpufreq_init_governor(policy))
> >> + if (cpufreq_init_governor(policy)) {
> >> policy->governor = NULL;
> >> - else
> >> - cpufreq_start_governor(policy);
> >> + } else if (cpufreq_start_governor(policy)) {
> >> + cpufreq_exit_governor(policy);
> >
> > This may introduce a governor module reference imbalance AFAICS.
>
> Sorry, I don't really understand this. Could you explain more? Thanks.
It looks like I've confused cpufreq_start_governor() with
cpufreq_init_governor(), sorry for the noise.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.