[PATCH v2 5/9] gpio: sysfs: rename the data variable in gpiod_(un)export()

Bartosz Golaszewski posted 9 patches 3 months, 2 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v2 5/9] gpio: sysfs: rename the data variable in gpiod_(un)export()
Posted by Bartosz Golaszewski 3 months, 2 weeks ago
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

In preparation for future commits which will make use of descriptor AND
GPIO-device data in the same functions rename the former from data to
desc_data separately which will make future changes smaller and easier
to read.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
index 2f1df2ceb7360200c718ea95089720ebfa5a513a..515fd0d307cf820b036b1ea966b300715992359f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
@@ -686,9 +686,9 @@ static void gpiod_attr_init(struct device_attribute *dev_attr, const char *name,
  */
 int gpiod_export(struct gpio_desc *desc, bool direction_may_change)
 {
+	struct gpiod_data *desc_data;
 	struct gpio_device *gdev;
 	struct attribute **attrs;
-	struct gpiod_data *data;
 	struct device *dev;
 	int status;
 
@@ -720,47 +720,48 @@ int gpiod_export(struct gpio_desc *desc, bool direction_may_change)
 		goto err_clear_bit;
 	}
 
-	data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!data) {
+	desc_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*desc_data), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!desc_data) {
 		status = -ENOMEM;
 		goto err_clear_bit;
 	}
 
-	data->desc = desc;
-	mutex_init(&data->mutex);
+	desc_data->desc = desc;
+	mutex_init(&desc_data->mutex);
 	if (guard.gc->direction_input && guard.gc->direction_output)
-		data->direction_can_change = direction_may_change;
+		desc_data->direction_can_change = direction_may_change;
 	else
-		data->direction_can_change = false;
+		desc_data->direction_can_change = false;
 
-	gpiod_attr_init(&data->dir_attr, "direction",
+	gpiod_attr_init(&desc_data->dir_attr, "direction",
 			direction_show, direction_store);
-	gpiod_attr_init(&data->val_attr, "value", value_show, value_store);
-	gpiod_attr_init(&data->edge_attr, "edge", edge_show, edge_store);
-	gpiod_attr_init(&data->active_low_attr, "active_low",
-			active_low_show, active_low_store);
+	gpiod_attr_init(&desc_data->val_attr, "value", value_show, value_store);
+	gpiod_attr_init(&desc_data->edge_attr, "edge", edge_show, edge_store);
+	gpiod_attr_init(&desc_data->active_low_attr, "active_low",
+				active_low_show, active_low_store);
 
-	attrs = data->attrs;
-	data->attr_group.is_visible = gpio_is_visible;
-	attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_DIRECTION] = &data->dir_attr.attr;
-	attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_VALUE] = &data->val_attr.attr;
-	attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_EDGE] = &data->edge_attr.attr;
+	attrs = desc_data->attrs;
+	desc_data->attr_group.is_visible = gpio_is_visible;
+	attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_DIRECTION] = &desc_data->dir_attr.attr;
+	attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_VALUE] = &desc_data->val_attr.attr;
+	attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_EDGE] = &desc_data->edge_attr.attr;
 	attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_ACTIVE_LOW] =
-						&data->active_low_attr.attr;
+				&desc_data->active_low_attr.attr;
 
-	data->attr_group.attrs = data->attrs;
-	data->attr_groups[0] = &data->attr_group;
+	desc_data->attr_group.attrs = desc_data->attrs;
+	desc_data->attr_groups[0] = &desc_data->attr_group;
 
 	dev = device_create_with_groups(&gpio_class, &gdev->dev,
-					MKDEV(0, 0), data, data->attr_groups,
+					MKDEV(0, 0), desc_data,
+					desc_data->attr_groups,
 					"gpio%u", desc_to_gpio(desc));
 	if (IS_ERR(dev)) {
 		status = PTR_ERR(dev);
 		goto err_free_data;
 	}
 
-	data->value_class_node = sysfs_get_dirent(dev->kobj.sd, "value");
-	if (!data->value_class_node) {
+	desc_data->value_class_node = sysfs_get_dirent(dev->kobj.sd, "value");
+	if (!desc_data->value_class_node) {
 		status = -ENODEV;
 		goto err_unregister_device;
 	}
@@ -770,7 +771,7 @@ int gpiod_export(struct gpio_desc *desc, bool direction_may_change)
 err_unregister_device:
 	device_unregister(dev);
 err_free_data:
-	kfree(data);
+	kfree(desc_data);
 err_clear_bit:
 	clear_bit(FLAG_EXPORT, &desc->flags);
 	gpiod_dbg(desc, "%s: status %d\n", __func__, status);
@@ -827,7 +828,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_export_link);
  */
 void gpiod_unexport(struct gpio_desc *desc)
 {
-	struct gpiod_data *data;
+	struct gpiod_data *desc_data;
 	struct device *dev;
 
 	if (!desc) {
@@ -843,22 +844,22 @@ void gpiod_unexport(struct gpio_desc *desc)
 		if (!dev)
 			return;
 
-		data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+		desc_data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 		clear_bit(FLAG_EXPORT, &desc->flags);
-		sysfs_put(data->value_class_node);
+		sysfs_put(desc_data->value_class_node);
 		device_unregister(dev);
 
 		/*
 		 * Release irq after deregistration to prevent race with
 		 * edge_store.
 		 */
-		if (data->irq_flags)
-			gpio_sysfs_free_irq(data);
+		if (desc_data->irq_flags)
+			gpio_sysfs_free_irq(desc_data);
 	}
 
 	put_device(dev);
-	mutex_destroy(&data->mutex);
-	kfree(data);
+	mutex_destroy(&desc_data->mutex);
+	kfree(desc_data);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_unexport);
 

-- 
2.48.1
Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] gpio: sysfs: rename the data variable in gpiod_(un)export()
Posted by Andy Shevchenko 3 months, 1 week ago
On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 10:59:53AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> 
> In preparation for future commits which will make use of descriptor AND
> GPIO-device data in the same functions rename the former from data to
> desc_data separately which will make future changes smaller and easier
> to read.

...

> +	attrs = desc_data->attrs;
> +	desc_data->attr_group.is_visible = gpio_is_visible;
> +	attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_DIRECTION] = &desc_data->dir_attr.attr;
> +	attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_VALUE] = &desc_data->val_attr.attr;
> +	attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_EDGE] = &desc_data->edge_attr.attr;
>  	attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_ACTIVE_LOW] =
> -						&data->active_low_attr.attr;
> +				&desc_data->active_low_attr.attr;

These were added in the previous patch and immediately got rewritten?!
Sounds like a wrong patch order.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] gpio: sysfs: rename the data variable in gpiod_(un)export()
Posted by Bartosz Golaszewski 3 months, 1 week ago
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 5:43 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 10:59:53AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> >
> > In preparation for future commits which will make use of descriptor AND
> > GPIO-device data in the same functions rename the former from data to
> > desc_data separately which will make future changes smaller and easier
> > to read.
>
> ...
>
> > +     attrs = desc_data->attrs;
> > +     desc_data->attr_group.is_visible = gpio_is_visible;
> > +     attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_DIRECTION] = &desc_data->dir_attr.attr;
> > +     attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_VALUE] = &desc_data->val_attr.attr;
> > +     attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_EDGE] = &desc_data->edge_attr.attr;
> >       attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_ACTIVE_LOW] =
> > -                                             &data->active_low_attr.attr;
> > +                             &desc_data->active_low_attr.attr;
>
> These were added in the previous patch and immediately got rewritten?!
> Sounds like a wrong patch order.
>

Yeah, bad rebase. Thanks for catching it.

Bart
Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] gpio: sysfs: rename the data variable in gpiod_(un)export()
Posted by Bartosz Golaszewski 3 months, 1 week ago
On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 10:57 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 5:43 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 10:59:53AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > >
> > > In preparation for future commits which will make use of descriptor AND
> > > GPIO-device data in the same functions rename the former from data to
> > > desc_data separately which will make future changes smaller and easier
> > > to read.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > +     attrs = desc_data->attrs;
> > > +     desc_data->attr_group.is_visible = gpio_is_visible;
> > > +     attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_DIRECTION] = &desc_data->dir_attr.attr;
> > > +     attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_VALUE] = &desc_data->val_attr.attr;
> > > +     attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_EDGE] = &desc_data->edge_attr.attr;
> > >       attrs[GPIO_SYSFS_LINE_ATTR_ACTIVE_LOW] =
> > > -                                             &data->active_low_attr.attr;
> > > +                             &desc_data->active_low_attr.attr;
> >
> > These were added in the previous patch and immediately got rewritten?!
> > Sounds like a wrong patch order.
> >
>
> Yeah, bad rebase. Thanks for catching it.
>
> Bart

Ah, no actually I got misled by the indentation difference. It was
supposed to be like this but maybe it is better to change places of
those two patches.

Bart
Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] gpio: sysfs: rename the data variable in gpiod_(un)export()
Posted by Linus Walleij 3 months, 2 weeks ago
On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 11:00 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:

> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
>
> In preparation for future commits which will make use of descriptor AND
> GPIO-device data in the same functions rename the former from data to
> desc_data separately which will make future changes smaller and easier
> to read.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij