There are a number of files within memory management which appear to be
most suitably placed within the page allocation section of MAINTAINERS and
are otherwise unassigned, so place these there.

Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
---
REVIEWERS - let me know if these seem appropriate, I'm eyeballing
this. even if they are not quite best placed a 'best effort' is still
worthwhile so we establish a place to put all mm files, we can always
incrementally update these later.

 MAINTAINERS | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 4523a6409186..58136a57b7a6 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -15856,8 +15856,17 @@ F:	include/linux/compaction.h
 F:	include/linux/gfp.h
 F:	include/linux/page-isolation.h
 F:	mm/compaction.c
+F:	mm/debug_page_alloc.c
+F:	mm/fail_page_alloc.c
 F:	mm/page_alloc.c
+F:	mm/page_ext.c
+F:	mm/page_frag_cache.c
 F:	mm/page_isolation.c
+F:	mm/page_owner.c
+F:	mm/page_poison.c
+F:	mm/page_reporting.c
+F:	mm/show_mem.c
+F:	mm/shuffle.c

 MEMORY MANAGEMENT - RECLAIM
 M:	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
--
2.49.0

On Mon Jun 16, 2025 at 8:24 PM UTC, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> REVIEWERS - let me know if these seem appropriate, I'm eyeballing
> this. even if they are not quite best placed a 'best effort' is still
> worthwhile so we establish a place to put all mm files, we can always
> incrementally update these later.

I don't value my own opinion very much here but FWIW this is
fine with me, thanks for taking care of it!

Acked-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>

On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 09:56:38AM +0000, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> On Mon Jun 16, 2025 at 8:24 PM UTC, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > REVIEWERS - let me know if these seem appropriate, I'm eyeballing
> > this. even if they are not quite best placed a 'best effort' is still
> > worthwhile so we establish a place to put all mm files, we can always
> > incrementally update these later.
>
> I don't value my own opinion very much here but FWIW this is
> fine with me, thanks for taking care of it!
>
> Acked-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>

Well I value it :) thanks!

On 6/16/25 22:24, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> There are a number of files within memory management which appear to be
> most suitably placed within the page allocation section of MAINTAINERS and
> are otherwise unassigned, so place these there.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> ---
> REVIEWERS - let me know if these seem appropriate, I'm eyeballing
> this. even if they are not quite best placed a 'best effort' is still
> worthwhile so we establish a place to put all mm files, we can always
> incrementally update these later.

All look relevant enough to me, well spotted.

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

> 
>  MAINTAINERS | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 4523a6409186..58136a57b7a6 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -15856,8 +15856,17 @@ F:	include/linux/compaction.h
>  F:	include/linux/gfp.h
>  F:	include/linux/page-isolation.h
>  F:	mm/compaction.c
> +F:	mm/debug_page_alloc.c
> +F:	mm/fail_page_alloc.c
>  F:	mm/page_alloc.c
> +F:	mm/page_ext.c
> +F:	mm/page_frag_cache.c
>  F:	mm/page_isolation.c
> +F:	mm/page_owner.c
> +F:	mm/page_poison.c
> +F:	mm/page_reporting.c
> +F:	mm/show_mem.c
> +F:	mm/shuffle.c
> 
>  MEMORY MANAGEMENT - RECLAIM
>  M:	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> --
> 2.49.0

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 08:32:02PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 6/16/25 22:24, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > There are a number of files within memory management which appear to be
> > most suitably placed within the page allocation section of MAINTAINERS and
> > are otherwise unassigned, so place these there.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > REVIEWERS - let me know if these seem appropriate, I'm eyeballing
> > this. even if they are not quite best placed a 'best effort' is still
> > worthwhile so we establish a place to put all mm files, we can always
> > incrementally update these later.
>
> All look relevant enough to me, well spotted.
>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

Thanks! Will send un-RFC in a second.