From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
On SoCs without MTK_SHARED_INT capability (mt7621 + mt7628) the first
IRQ (eth->irq[0]) was read but never used. Skip reading it now too.
Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 11 ++++++++---
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
index 9aec67c9c6d7..4d7de282b940 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
@@ -3346,10 +3346,15 @@ static int mtk_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_eth *eth)
return 0;
for (i = 0; i < MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX; i++) {
- if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_SHARED_INT) && i > 0)
- eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED];
+ if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_SHARED_INT)) {
+ if (i == 0)
+ eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
+ else
+ eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED];
+ } else if (i < 2) //skip the 1st and 4th IRQ on !MTK_SHARED_INT
+ eth->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i + 1);
else
- eth->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
+ continue;
if (eth->irq[i] < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no IRQ%d resource found\n", i);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
index 6b1208d05f79..ff2ae3c80179 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
@@ -643,8 +643,8 @@
#define MTK_MAC_FSM(x) (0x1010C + ((x) * 0x100))
#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED 0
-#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX 1
-#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX 2
+#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX 0
+#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX 1
#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX 3
struct mtk_rx_dma {
--
2.43.0
On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 05:03:18PM +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote: > From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de> > > On SoCs without MTK_SHARED_INT capability (mt7621 + mt7628) the first > IRQ (eth->irq[0]) was read but never used. Skip reading it now too. > > Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 11 ++++++++--- > drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c > index 9aec67c9c6d7..4d7de282b940 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c > @@ -3346,10 +3346,15 @@ static int mtk_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_eth *eth) > return 0; > > for (i = 0; i < MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX; i++) { > - if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_SHARED_INT) && i > 0) > - eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED]; > + if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_SHARED_INT)) { > + if (i == 0) > + eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i); > + else > + eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED]; > + } else if (i < 2) //skip the 1st and 4th IRQ on !MTK_SHARED_INT Please use conformant comment style, ie. do not use '//' but always use '/* ... */' instead, on a dedicated line. > + eth->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i + 1); > else > - eth->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i); > + continue; > > if (eth->irq[i] < 0) { > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no IRQ%d resource found\n", i); > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h > index 6b1208d05f79..ff2ae3c80179 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h > @@ -643,8 +643,8 @@ > #define MTK_MAC_FSM(x) (0x1010C + ((x) * 0x100)) > > #define MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED 0 > -#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX 1 > -#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX 2 > +#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX 0 > +#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX 1 > #define MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX 3 Shouldn't MAX be 1 now?
Am 15. Juni 2025 21:49:43 MESZ schrieb Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>: >On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 05:03:18PM +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote: >> From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de> >> >> On SoCs without MTK_SHARED_INT capability (mt7621 + mt7628) the first >> IRQ (eth->irq[0]) was read but never used. Skip reading it now too. >> >> Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de> >> --- >> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 11 ++++++++--- >> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h | 4 ++-- >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c >> index 9aec67c9c6d7..4d7de282b940 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c >> @@ -3346,10 +3346,15 @@ static int mtk_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_eth *eth) >> return 0; >> >> for (i = 0; i < MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX; i++) { >> - if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_SHARED_INT) && i > 0) >> - eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED]; >> + if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_SHARED_INT)) { >> + if (i == 0) >> + eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i); >> + else >> + eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED]; >> + } else if (i < 2) //skip the 1st and 4th IRQ on !MTK_SHARED_INT > >Please use conformant comment style, ie. do not use '//' but always use >'/* ... */' instead, on a dedicated line. Ok,not sure if the comment should stay :) It was a comment for me and i forgot to remove it. >> + eth->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i + 1); >> else >> - eth->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i); >> + continue; >> >> if (eth->irq[i] < 0) { >> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no IRQ%d resource found\n", i); >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h >> index 6b1208d05f79..ff2ae3c80179 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h >> @@ -643,8 +643,8 @@ >> #define MTK_MAC_FSM(x) (0x1010C + ((x) * 0x100)) >> >> #define MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED 0 >> -#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX 1 >> -#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX 2 >> +#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX 0 >> +#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX 1 >> #define MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX 3 > >Shouldn't MAX be 1 now? No as we still need to loop over the first 3 irqs on the older devicetrees. Or was the MAX intented for anything else (e.g. array size for storing the sw irqs - not changed this yet,but imho thi should be 2 now if SHARED_INT does not need 3 entries)? regards Frank
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.