From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
On SoCs without MTK_SHARED_INT capability (mt7621 + mt7628) the first
IRQ (eth->irq[0]) was read but never used. Skip reading it now too.
Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 11 ++++++++---
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
index 9aec67c9c6d7..4d7de282b940 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
@@ -3346,10 +3346,15 @@ static int mtk_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_eth *eth)
return 0;
for (i = 0; i < MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX; i++) {
- if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_SHARED_INT) && i > 0)
- eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED];
+ if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_SHARED_INT)) {
+ if (i == 0)
+ eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
+ else
+ eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED];
+ } else if (i < 2) //skip the 1st and 4th IRQ on !MTK_SHARED_INT
+ eth->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i + 1);
else
- eth->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
+ continue;
if (eth->irq[i] < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no IRQ%d resource found\n", i);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
index 6b1208d05f79..ff2ae3c80179 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
@@ -643,8 +643,8 @@
#define MTK_MAC_FSM(x) (0x1010C + ((x) * 0x100))
#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED 0
-#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX 1
-#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX 2
+#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX 0
+#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX 1
#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX 3
struct mtk_rx_dma {
--
2.43.0
On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 05:03:18PM +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
>
> On SoCs without MTK_SHARED_INT capability (mt7621 + mt7628) the first
> IRQ (eth->irq[0]) was read but never used. Skip reading it now too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 11 ++++++++---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> index 9aec67c9c6d7..4d7de282b940 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
> @@ -3346,10 +3346,15 @@ static int mtk_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_eth *eth)
> return 0;
>
> for (i = 0; i < MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX; i++) {
> - if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_SHARED_INT) && i > 0)
> - eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED];
> + if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_SHARED_INT)) {
> + if (i == 0)
> + eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
> + else
> + eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED];
> + } else if (i < 2) //skip the 1st and 4th IRQ on !MTK_SHARED_INT
Please use conformant comment style, ie. do not use '//' but always use
'/* ... */' instead, on a dedicated line.
> + eth->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i + 1);
> else
> - eth->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
> + continue;
>
> if (eth->irq[i] < 0) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no IRQ%d resource found\n", i);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
> index 6b1208d05f79..ff2ae3c80179 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
> @@ -643,8 +643,8 @@
> #define MTK_MAC_FSM(x) (0x1010C + ((x) * 0x100))
>
> #define MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED 0
> -#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX 1
> -#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX 2
> +#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX 0
> +#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX 1
> #define MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX 3
Shouldn't MAX be 1 now?
Am 15. Juni 2025 21:49:43 MESZ schrieb Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>:
>On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 05:03:18PM +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>> From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
>>
>> On SoCs without MTK_SHARED_INT capability (mt7621 + mt7628) the first
>> IRQ (eth->irq[0]) was read but never used. Skip reading it now too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 11 ++++++++---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h | 4 ++--
>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
>> index 9aec67c9c6d7..4d7de282b940 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
>> @@ -3346,10 +3346,15 @@ static int mtk_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_eth *eth)
>> return 0;
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX; i++) {
>> - if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_SHARED_INT) && i > 0)
>> - eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED];
>> + if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_SHARED_INT)) {
>> + if (i == 0)
>> + eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
>> + else
>> + eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED];
>> + } else if (i < 2) //skip the 1st and 4th IRQ on !MTK_SHARED_INT
>
>Please use conformant comment style, ie. do not use '//' but always use
>'/* ... */' instead, on a dedicated line.
Ok,not sure if the comment should stay :)
It was a comment for me and i forgot to remove it.
>> + eth->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i + 1);
>> else
>> - eth->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
>> + continue;
>>
>> if (eth->irq[i] < 0) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no IRQ%d resource found\n", i);
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
>> index 6b1208d05f79..ff2ae3c80179 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
>> @@ -643,8 +643,8 @@
>> #define MTK_MAC_FSM(x) (0x1010C + ((x) * 0x100))
>>
>> #define MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED 0
>> -#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX 1
>> -#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX 2
>> +#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX 0
>> +#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX 1
>> #define MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX 3
>
>Shouldn't MAX be 1 now?
No as we still need to loop over the first 3 irqs
on the older devicetrees. Or was the MAX
intented for anything else (e.g. array size for
storing the sw irqs - not changed this yet,but
imho thi should be 2 now if SHARED_INT does
not need 3 entries)?
regards Frank
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.