.../soc/sophgo/sophgo,cv1800b-top-syscon.yaml | 57 +++++++++++++++++++ arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv180x.dtsi | 40 +++++++++++++ .../boot/dts/sophgo/cv1812h-huashan-pi.dts | 4 ++ 3 files changed, 101 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/sophgo/sophgo,cv1800b-top-syscon.yaml
Add top syscon device bindings related DTS change for CV1800. The patch required the following 3 patch series. 1. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611075321.1160973-1-inochiama@gmail.com 2. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611081804.1196397-1-inochiama@gmail.com 3. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611081000.1187374-1-inochiama@gmail.com Inochi Amaoto (3): dt-bindings: soc: sophgo: add TOP syscon for CV18XX/SG200X series SoC riscv: dts: sophgo: Add syscon node for cv18xx riscv: dts: sophgo: Add USB support for cv18xx .../soc/sophgo/sophgo,cv1800b-top-syscon.yaml | 57 +++++++++++++++++++ arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv180x.dtsi | 40 +++++++++++++ .../boot/dts/sophgo/cv1812h-huashan-pi.dts | 4 ++ 3 files changed, 101 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/sophgo/sophgo,cv1800b-top-syscon.yaml -- 2.49.0
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 04:24:48PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote: > Add top syscon device bindings related DTS change for CV1800. > > The patch required the following 3 patch series. > 1. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611075321.1160973-1-inochiama@gmail.com > 2. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611081804.1196397-1-inochiama@gmail.com > 3. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611081000.1187374-1-inochiama@gmail.com What is RFC about this?
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 05:14:59PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 04:24:48PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote: > > Add top syscon device bindings related DTS change for CV1800. > > > > The patch required the following 3 patch series. > > 1. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611075321.1160973-1-inochiama@gmail.com > > 2. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611081804.1196397-1-inochiama@gmail.com > > 3. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611081000.1187374-1-inochiama@gmail.com > > What is RFC about this? I use RFC to ignore the patch check, as the dependency are not merged. This series itself require the binding from link 2 3, which provdes binding of the USB2 phy and DMA multiplexer. Regards, Inochi
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 08:30:17AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 05:14:59PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 04:24:48PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote: > > > Add top syscon device bindings related DTS change for CV1800. > > > > > > The patch required the following 3 patch series. > > > 1. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611075321.1160973-1-inochiama@gmail.com > > > 2. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611081804.1196397-1-inochiama@gmail.com > > > 3. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611081000.1187374-1-inochiama@gmail.com > > > > What is RFC about this? > > I use RFC to ignore the patch check, as the dependency are not merged. > This series itself require the binding from link 2 3, which provdes > binding of the USB2 phy and DMA multiplexer. In the future, please provide a reason for things being RFC in the cover letter or patches themselves.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 04:58:39PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 08:30:17AM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 05:14:59PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 04:24:48PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote: > > > > Add top syscon device bindings related DTS change for CV1800. > > > > > > > > The patch required the following 3 patch series. > > > > 1. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611075321.1160973-1-inochiama@gmail.com > > > > 2. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611081804.1196397-1-inochiama@gmail.com > > > > 3. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611081000.1187374-1-inochiama@gmail.com > > > > > > What is RFC about this? > > > > I use RFC to ignore the patch check, as the dependency are not merged. > > This series itself require the binding from link 2 3, which provdes > > binding of the USB2 phy and DMA multiplexer. > > In the future, please provide a reason for things being RFC in the cover > letter or patches themselves. Sure, I will. Regards, Inochi
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.