On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 05:37:39PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 at 15:38, Thomas Weißschuh
> <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > Currently there is no test validating the result reporting from nested
> > tests. Add one, it will also be used to validate upcoming changes to the
> > nested test parsing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
> > ---
>
> This looks good, modulo a couple of minor suggestions below.
>
> Regardless,
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
>
> Cheers,
> -- David
>
> > tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 9 +++++++++
> > .../kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-failure-nested.log | 7 +++++++
> > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> > index bbba921e0eacb18663abfcabb2bccf330d8666f5..691cde9b030f7729128490c1bdb42ccee1967ad6 100755
> > --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> > @@ -165,6 +165,15 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase):
> > self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.FAILURE, result.status)
> > self.assertEqual(result.counts.errors, 0)
> >
> > + def test_parse_failed_nested_tests_log(self):
> > + nested_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-failure-nested.log')
> > + with open(nested_log) as file:
> > + result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines(), stdout)
> > + self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.FAILURE, result.status)
> > + self.assertEqual(result.counts.failed, 2)
> > + self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.FAILURE, result.subtests[0].status)
>
> Is it worth also testing the value of the nested test's result here? i.e.,
> self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.FAILURE,
> result.subtests[0].subtests[0].status)
This should be result.subtests[1].subtests[0].status.
But Ack and done.
> > + self.assertEqual(kunit_parser.TestStatus.FAILURE, result.subtests[1].status)
> > +
> > def test_no_header(self):
> > empty_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_no_header.log')
> > with open(empty_log) as file:
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-failure-nested.log b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-failure-nested.log
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..835816e0a07715a514f5f5afab1b6250037feaf4
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-failure-nested.log
> > @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> > +KTAP version 1
> > +1..2
> > +not ok 1 subtest 1
> > + KTAP version 1
> > + 1..1
> > + not ok 1 test 1
> > +not ok 2 subtest 2
>
> Having these named 'subtest 1' and 'test 1' is a bit confusing to me
> (as it implies the outer tests are subtests of the inner ones, which
> isn't right).
>
> Could we either swap 'subtest' and 'test' here, or -- if we want to
> preserve the match between 'subtest' here and the subtest in the
> python code -- label the inner one something like 'subsubtest'?
Ack.