arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
AM64X SoC has one instance of PCIe which is PCIe0. To support PCIe boot
on AM64X SoC, PCIe0 needs to be in endpoint mode and it needs to be
functional at all stages of PCIe boot process. Thus add the
"bootph-all" boot phase tag to "pcie0_ep" device tree node.
Signed-off-by: Hrushikesh Salunke <h-salunke@ti.com>
---
This patch is based on commit
475c850a7fdd Add linux-next specific files for 20250606
Changes since v1
As per feedback from Nishanth, changed the position of "bootph-all"
tag, according to ordering rules for device tree properties.
v1 : https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250609115930.w2s6jzg7xii55dlu@speckled/
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso
index 432751774853..a7e8d4ea98ac 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ pcie0_ep: pcie-ep@f102000 {
max-functions = /bits/ 8 <1>;
phys = <&serdes0_pcie_link>;
phy-names = "pcie-phy";
+ bootph-all;
ti,syscon-pcie-ctrl = <&pcie0_ctrl 0x0>;
};
};
--
2.34.1
Hi Hrushikesh Salunke, On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 11:19:20 +0530, Hrushikesh Salunke wrote: > AM64X SoC has one instance of PCIe which is PCIe0. To support PCIe boot > on AM64X SoC, PCIe0 needs to be in endpoint mode and it needs to be > functional at all stages of PCIe boot process. Thus add the > "bootph-all" boot phase tag to "pcie0_ep" device tree node. > > I have applied the following to branch ti-k3-dts-next on [1]. Thank you! [1/1] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep: Add boot phase tag to "pcie0_ep" commit: 26bc2019542fe262b799546c5211cc4b88b3f5ea All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent up the chain during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a relevant bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ti/linux.git -- Vignesh
On 10/06/25 11:19, Hrushikesh Salunke wrote: > AM64X SoC has one instance of PCIe which is PCIe0. To support PCIe boot > on AM64X SoC, PCIe0 needs to be in endpoint mode and it needs to be > functional at all stages of PCIe boot process. Thus add the > "bootph-all" boot phase tag to "pcie0_ep" device tree node. > > Signed-off-by: Hrushikesh Salunke <h-salunke@ti.com> > --- > This patch is based on commit > 475c850a7fdd Add linux-next specific files for 20250606 > > Changes since v1 > As per feedback from Nishanth, changed the position of "bootph-all" > tag, according to ordering rules for device tree properties. > > v1 : https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250609115930.w2s6jzg7xii55dlu@speckled/ > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso > index 432751774853..a7e8d4ea98ac 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ pcie0_ep: pcie-ep@f102000 { > max-functions = /bits/ 8 <1>; > phys = <&serdes0_pcie_link>; > phy-names = "pcie-phy"; > + bootph-all; > ti,syscon-pcie-ctrl = <&pcie0_ctrl 0x0>; > }; > }; Are the patches for PCIe boot support merged to U-Boot or such other bootloader repo? -- Regards Vignesh https://ti.com/opensource
On 11/06/25 14:14, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: > > > On 10/06/25 11:19, Hrushikesh Salunke wrote: >> AM64X SoC has one instance of PCIe which is PCIe0. To support PCIe boot >> on AM64X SoC, PCIe0 needs to be in endpoint mode and it needs to be >> functional at all stages of PCIe boot process. Thus add the >> "bootph-all" boot phase tag to "pcie0_ep" device tree node. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hrushikesh Salunke <h-salunke@ti.com> >> --- >> This patch is based on commit >> 475c850a7fdd Add linux-next specific files for 20250606 >> >> Changes since v1 >> As per feedback from Nishanth, changed the position of "bootph-all" >> tag, according to ordering rules for device tree properties. >> >> v1 : https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250609115930.w2s6jzg7xii55dlu@speckled/ >> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso >> index 432751774853..a7e8d4ea98ac 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso >> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ pcie0_ep: pcie-ep@f102000 { >> max-functions = /bits/ 8 <1>; >> phys = <&serdes0_pcie_link>; >> phy-names = "pcie-phy"; >> + bootph-all; >> ti,syscon-pcie-ctrl = <&pcie0_ctrl 0x0>; >> }; >> }; > > Are the patches for PCIe boot support merged to U-Boot or such other > bootloader repo? > No, they are not in the U-Boot yet. I will be posting patches for PCIe boot support for U-Boot this week. Regards, Hrushikesh
On 11/06/25 14:17, Hrushikesh Salunke wrote: > > > On 11/06/25 14:14, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: >> >> >> On 10/06/25 11:19, Hrushikesh Salunke wrote: >>> AM64X SoC has one instance of PCIe which is PCIe0. To support PCIe boot >>> on AM64X SoC, PCIe0 needs to be in endpoint mode and it needs to be >>> functional at all stages of PCIe boot process. Thus add the >>> "bootph-all" boot phase tag to "pcie0_ep" device tree node. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Hrushikesh Salunke <h-salunke@ti.com> >>> --- >>> This patch is based on commit >>> 475c850a7fdd Add linux-next specific files for 20250606 >>> >>> Changes since v1 >>> As per feedback from Nishanth, changed the position of "bootph-all" >>> tag, according to ordering rules for device tree properties. >>> >>> v1 : >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250609115930.w2s6jzg7xii55dlu@speckled/ >>> >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso >>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso >>> index 432751774853..a7e8d4ea98ac 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso >>> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ pcie0_ep: pcie-ep@f102000 { >>> max-functions = /bits/ 8 <1>; >>> phys = <&serdes0_pcie_link>; >>> phy-names = "pcie-phy"; >>> + bootph-all; >>> ti,syscon-pcie-ctrl = <&pcie0_ctrl 0x0>; >>> }; >>> }; >> >> Are the patches for PCIe boot support merged to U-Boot or such other >> bootloader repo? >> No, they are not in the U-Boot yet. I will be posting patches for PCIe > boot support for U-Boot this week. > I have posted Patch series for the PCIe boot support in Uboot. 1.https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20250612084910.3457060-1-h-salunke@ti.com/ 2. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/cover/20250612085023.3457117-1-h-salunke@ti.com/ 3. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/cover/20250612085534.3457522-1-h-salunke@ti.com/ Regards, Hrushikesh.
On 12/06/25 15:46, Hrushikesh Salunke wrote: > > > On 11/06/25 14:17, Hrushikesh Salunke wrote: >> >> >> On 11/06/25 14:14, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 10/06/25 11:19, Hrushikesh Salunke wrote: >>>> AM64X SoC has one instance of PCIe which is PCIe0. To support PCIe boot >>>> on AM64X SoC, PCIe0 needs to be in endpoint mode and it needs to be >>>> functional at all stages of PCIe boot process. Thus add the >>>> "bootph-all" boot phase tag to "pcie0_ep" device tree node. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Hrushikesh Salunke <h-salunke@ti.com> >>>> --- >>>> This patch is based on commit >>>> 475c850a7fdd Add linux-next specific files for 20250606 >>>> >>>> Changes since v1 >>>> As per feedback from Nishanth, changed the position of "bootph-all" >>>> tag, according to ordering rules for device tree properties. >>>> >>>> v1 : https://lore.kernel.org/ >>>> all/20250609115930.w2s6jzg7xii55dlu@speckled/ >>>> >>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso | 1 + >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso b/ >>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso >>>> index 432751774853..a7e8d4ea98ac 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso >>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso >>>> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ pcie0_ep: pcie-ep@f102000 { >>>> max-functions = /bits/ 8 <1>; >>>> phys = <&serdes0_pcie_link>; >>>> phy-names = "pcie-phy"; >>>> + bootph-all; >>>> ti,syscon-pcie-ctrl = <&pcie0_ctrl 0x0>; >>>> }; >>>> }; >>> >>> Are the patches for PCIe boot support merged to U-Boot or such other >>> bootloader repo? >>> No, they are not in the U-Boot yet. I will be posting patches for PCIe >> boot support for U-Boot this week. >> > > I have posted Patch series for the PCIe boot support in Uboot. Great, but dont you need bootph-all in dependent nodes as well such as serdes0_pcie_link pcie0_ctrl? how does this work otherwise? > > 1.https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/ > patch/20250612084910.3457060-1-h-salunke@ti.com/ > 2. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/ > cover/20250612085023.3457117-1-h-salunke@ti.com/ > 3. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/ > cover/20250612085534.3457522-1-h-salunke@ti.com/ > > > Regards, > Hrushikesh. -- Regards Vignesh https://ti.com/opensource
On 19/06/25 13:25, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: > > > On 12/06/25 15:46, Hrushikesh Salunke wrote: >> >> >> On 11/06/25 14:17, Hrushikesh Salunke wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 11/06/25 14:14, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/06/25 11:19, Hrushikesh Salunke wrote: >>>>> AM64X SoC has one instance of PCIe which is PCIe0. To support PCIe boot >>>>> on AM64X SoC, PCIe0 needs to be in endpoint mode and it needs to be >>>>> functional at all stages of PCIe boot process. Thus add the >>>>> "bootph-all" boot phase tag to "pcie0_ep" device tree node. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Hrushikesh Salunke <h-salunke@ti.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> This patch is based on commit >>>>> 475c850a7fdd Add linux-next specific files for 20250606 >>>>> >>>>> Changes since v1 >>>>> As per feedback from Nishanth, changed the position of "bootph-all" >>>>> tag, according to ordering rules for device tree properties. >>>>> >>>>> v1 : https://lore.kernel.org/ >>>>> all/20250609115930.w2s6jzg7xii55dlu@speckled/ >>>>> >>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso | 1 + >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso b/ >>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso >>>>> index 432751774853..a7e8d4ea98ac 100644 >>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-pcie0-ep.dtso >>>>> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ pcie0_ep: pcie-ep@f102000 { >>>>> max-functions = /bits/ 8 <1>; >>>>> phys = <&serdes0_pcie_link>; >>>>> phy-names = "pcie-phy"; >>>>> + bootph-all; >>>>> ti,syscon-pcie-ctrl = <&pcie0_ctrl 0x0>; >>>>> }; >>>>> }; >>>> >>>> Are the patches for PCIe boot support merged to U-Boot or such other >>>> bootloader repo? >>>> No, they are not in the U-Boot yet. I will be posting patches for PCIe >>> boot support for U-Boot this week. >>> >> >> I have posted Patch series for the PCIe boot support in Uboot. > > > Great, but dont you need bootph-all in dependent nodes as well such as > serdes0_pcie_link pcie0_ctrl? how does this work otherwise? > When booting through PCIe, ROM configures SERDES for PCIe. So we don't need to reconfigure it again in subsequent bootstages, we can keep using the same configuration. As for PCIe endpoint controller, BAR registers and Address Translation registers needs to be re-configured at each bootstage, as bootloaders at different stage are stored at different memory location. >> >> 1.https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/ >> patch/20250612084910.3457060-1-h-salunke@ti.com/ >> 2. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/ >> cover/20250612085023.3457117-1-h-salunke@ti.com/ >> 3. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/ >> cover/20250612085534.3457522-1-h-salunke@ti.com/ >> >> >> Regards, >> Hrushikesh. >
On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 11:19:20AM +0530, Hrushikesh Salunke wrote: > AM64X SoC has one instance of PCIe which is PCIe0. To support PCIe boot > on AM64X SoC, PCIe0 needs to be in endpoint mode and it needs to be > functional at all stages of PCIe boot process. Thus add the > "bootph-all" boot phase tag to "pcie0_ep" device tree node. > > Signed-off-by: Hrushikesh Salunke <h-salunke@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com> Regards, Siddharth.
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.