There are unnecessary brace used in the conditional statement where
ptp_vclock_in_use() is used in ptp_clock_unregister(). This should be
removed.

Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
index 35a5994bf64f..0ae9f074fc52 100644
--- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
+++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
@@ -412,9 +412,8 @@ static int unregister_vclock(struct device *dev, void *data)
 
 int ptp_clock_unregister(struct ptp_clock *ptp)
 {
-	if (ptp_vclock_in_use(ptp)) {
+	if (ptp_vclock_in_use(ptp))
 		device_for_each_child(&ptp->dev, NULL, unregister_vclock);
-	}
 
 	ptp->defunct = 1;
 	wake_up_interruptible(&ptp->tsev_wq);
--

On Fri,  6 Jun 2025 19:36:59 +0900 Jeongjun Park wrote:
> There are unnecessary brace used in the conditional statement where
> ptp_vclock_in_use() is used in ptp_clock_unregister(). This should be
> removed.

Quoting documentation:

  Clean-up patches
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  
  Netdev discourages patches which perform simple clean-ups, which are not in
  the context of other work. For example:
  
  * Addressing ``checkpatch.pl`` warnings
  * Addressing :ref:`Local variable ordering<rcs>` issues
  * Conversions to device-managed APIs (``devm_`` helpers)
  
  This is because it is felt that the churn that such changes produce comes
  at a greater cost than the value of such clean-ups.
  
  Conversely, spelling and grammar fixes are not discouraged.
  
See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#clean-up-patches
-- 
pw-bot: reject