drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_pm_domain.c | 12 +++--------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com>
There is no need to introduce the boolean power_on to select the constant
value for state. Simply pass the value for state as argument. Just remove
this code clutter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com>
---
drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_pm_domain.c | 12 +++---------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_pm_domain.c b/drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_pm_domain.c
index 2a213c218126..8fe1c0a501c9 100644
--- a/drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_pm_domain.c
+++ b/drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_pm_domain.c
@@ -22,27 +22,21 @@ struct scmi_pm_domain {
#define to_scmi_pd(gpd) container_of(gpd, struct scmi_pm_domain, genpd)
-static int scmi_pd_power(struct generic_pm_domain *domain, bool power_on)
+static int scmi_pd_power(struct generic_pm_domain *domain, u32 state)
{
- u32 state;
struct scmi_pm_domain *pd = to_scmi_pd(domain);
- if (power_on)
- state = SCMI_POWER_STATE_GENERIC_ON;
- else
- state = SCMI_POWER_STATE_GENERIC_OFF;
-
return power_ops->state_set(pd->ph, pd->domain, state);
}
static int scmi_pd_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
{
- return scmi_pd_power(domain, true);
+ return scmi_pd_power(domain, SCMI_POWER_STATE_GENERIC_ON);
}
static int scmi_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
{
- return scmi_pd_power(domain, false);
+ return scmi_pd_power(domain, SCMI_POWER_STATE_GENERIC_OFF);
}
static int scmi_pm_domain_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
--
2.49.0
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 at 11:08, Lukas Bulwahn <lbulwahn@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com>
>
> There is no need to introduce the boolean power_on to select the constant
> value for state. Simply pass the value for state as argument. Just remove
> this code clutter.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com>
Applied for next, thanks!
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_pm_domain.c | 12 +++---------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_pm_domain.c b/drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_pm_domain.c
> index 2a213c218126..8fe1c0a501c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_pm_domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/arm/scmi_pm_domain.c
> @@ -22,27 +22,21 @@ struct scmi_pm_domain {
>
> #define to_scmi_pd(gpd) container_of(gpd, struct scmi_pm_domain, genpd)
>
> -static int scmi_pd_power(struct generic_pm_domain *domain, bool power_on)
> +static int scmi_pd_power(struct generic_pm_domain *domain, u32 state)
> {
> - u32 state;
> struct scmi_pm_domain *pd = to_scmi_pd(domain);
>
> - if (power_on)
> - state = SCMI_POWER_STATE_GENERIC_ON;
> - else
> - state = SCMI_POWER_STATE_GENERIC_OFF;
> -
> return power_ops->state_set(pd->ph, pd->domain, state);
> }
>
> static int scmi_pd_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
> {
> - return scmi_pd_power(domain, true);
> + return scmi_pd_power(domain, SCMI_POWER_STATE_GENERIC_ON);
> }
>
> static int scmi_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
> {
> - return scmi_pd_power(domain, false);
> + return scmi_pd_power(domain, SCMI_POWER_STATE_GENERIC_OFF);
> }
>
> static int scmi_pm_domain_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
> --
> 2.49.0
>
Lukas Bulwahn <lbulwahn@redhat.com> writes: > From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com> > > There is no need to introduce the boolean power_on to select the constant > value for state. Simply pass the value for state as argument. Just remove > this code clutter. > > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com> > --- Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com> -- Best regards, Javier Martinez Canillas Core Platforms Red Hat
On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 11:08:02AM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com> > > There is no need to introduce the boolean power_on to select the constant > value for state. Simply pass the value for state as argument. Just remove > this code clutter. > > No functional change. > Nice cleanup. Thanks for doing this. Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Ulf, I assume you will pick this up when you start collecting patches for next merge window. -- Regards, Sudeep
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.