From: Yury Norov [NVIDIA] <yury.norov@gmail.com>
The dedicated helper is more verbose and effective comparing to
cpumask_first() followed by cpumask_next().
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov [NVIDIA] <yury.norov@gmail.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 3bef0754cf73..3518ea5ec55f 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -2221,12 +2221,9 @@ static int wq_select_unbound_cpu(int cpu)
}
new_cpu = __this_cpu_read(wq_rr_cpu_last);
- new_cpu = cpumask_next_and(new_cpu, wq_unbound_cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
- if (unlikely(new_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)) {
- new_cpu = cpumask_first_and(wq_unbound_cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
- if (unlikely(new_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids))
- return cpu;
- }
+ new_cpu = cpumask_next_and_wrap(new_cpu, wq_unbound_cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
+ if (unlikely(new_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids))
+ return cpu;
__this_cpu_write(wq_rr_cpu_last, new_cpu);
return new_cpu;
--
2.43.0