kernel/watchdog_buddy.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
From: Yury Norov [NVIDIA] <yury.norov@gmail.com>
The dedicated helper is more verbose and efficient comparing to
cpumask_next() followed by cpumask_first().
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov [NVIDIA] <yury.norov@gmail.com>
---
kernel/watchdog_buddy.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog_buddy.c b/kernel/watchdog_buddy.c
index 34dbfe091f4b..ee754d767c21 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog_buddy.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog_buddy.c
@@ -12,10 +12,7 @@ static unsigned int watchdog_next_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
{
unsigned int next_cpu;
- next_cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, &watchdog_cpus);
- if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
- next_cpu = cpumask_first(&watchdog_cpus);
-
+ next_cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(cpu, &watchdog_cpus);
if (next_cpu == cpu)
return nr_cpu_ids;
--
2.43.0
Hi, On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 5:12 PM Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Yury Norov [NVIDIA] <yury.norov@gmail.com> > > The dedicated helper is more verbose and efficient comparing to > cpumask_next() followed by cpumask_first(). > > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov [NVIDIA] <yury.norov@gmail.com> > --- > kernel/watchdog_buddy.c | 5 +---- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 10:16:51AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 5:12 PM Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > From: Yury Norov [NVIDIA] <yury.norov@gmail.com> > > > > The dedicated helper is more verbose and efficient comparing to > > cpumask_next() followed by cpumask_first(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov [NVIDIA] <yury.norov@gmail.com> > > --- > > kernel/watchdog_buddy.c | 5 +---- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Thanks, Douglas. Adding in bitmap-for-next for testing.
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.