On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 07:16:50PM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
> This is used to mock up a divider in the clk kunit tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
> index 1b34d54ec9c610ffa3e91b06f5a5180e0395e26f..4908fb9c0c46e34063ecf696e49b48510da44538 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
> @@ -140,6 +140,47 @@ static const struct clk_ops clk_dummy_single_parent_ops = {
> .get_parent = clk_dummy_single_get_parent,
> };
>
> +// 4 ought to be enough for anybody
> +#define CLK_DUMMY_DIV_WIDTH 4
> +
> +struct clk_dummy_div {
> + struct clk_hw hw;
> + unsigned int div;
> +};
> +
> +static unsigned long clk_dummy_div_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + struct clk_dummy_div *div = container_of(hw, struct clk_dummy_div, hw);
> +
> + return divider_recalc_rate(hw, parent_rate, div->div, NULL,
> + CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST, CLK_DUMMY_DIV_WIDTH);
> +}
> +
> +static long clk_dummy_div_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long *parent_rate)
> +{
> + return divider_round_rate(hw, rate, parent_rate, NULL,
> + CLK_DUMMY_DIV_WIDTH, CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST);
> +}
> +
> +static int clk_dummy_div_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + struct clk_dummy_div *div = container_of(hw, struct clk_dummy_div, hw);
> +
> + div->div = divider_get_val(rate, parent_rate, NULL, CLK_DUMMY_DIV_WIDTH,
> + CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
I wonder if we should use CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED too, that way we would
catch any improperly initialized structure.
Maxime