.../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Rename child node name patterns to align with conventions.
uart0-pins => uart0-cfg
uart0-cfg uart0-pins
This avoids potential confusion and improves consistency with existing
bindings like sophgo,sg2042-pinctrl and starfive,jh7110-aon-pinctrl.
Fixes: 561f3e9d21a1 ("dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add support for canaan,k230 SoC")
Signed-off-by: Ze Huang <huangze@whut.edu.cn>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml
index 0b462eb6dfe169a292bf716503c03d029f1ac7ee..f4e0da0bf7fa30af5132644109dbd371ddfc0228 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ properties:
maxItems: 1
patternProperties:
- '-pins$':
+ '-cfg$':
type: object
additionalProperties: false
description:
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ patternProperties:
pinctrl groups available on the machine.
patternProperties:
- '-cfg$':
+ '-pins$':
type: object
allOf:
- $ref: /schemas/pinctrl/pincfg-node.yaml
@@ -112,8 +112,8 @@ examples:
compatible = "canaan,k230-pinctrl";
reg = <0x91105000 0x100>;
- uart2-pins {
- uart2-pins-cfg {
+ uart2-cfg {
+ uart2-pins {
pinmux = <0x503>, /* uart2 txd */
<0x603>; /* uart2 rxd */
slew-rate = <0>;
---
base-commit: 0a4b866d08c6adaea2f4592d31edac6deeb4dcbd
change-id: 20250526-k230-binding-fix-3125ff43f930
Best regards,
--
Ze Huang <huangze@whut.edu.cn>
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 12:23:35AM +0800, Ze Huang wrote:
> Rename child node name patterns to align with conventions.
>
> uart0-pins => uart0-cfg
> uart0-cfg uart0-pins
>
> This avoids potential confusion and improves consistency with existing
> bindings like sophgo,sg2042-pinctrl and starfive,jh7110-aon-pinctrl.
>
> Fixes: 561f3e9d21a1 ("dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add support for canaan,k230 SoC")
You're changing something merged in October of last year, which is an
ABI break, for what seems like a cosmetic change to me. What makes this
worth it? Consistency with some devices by other vendors isn't a strong
argument I don't think.
> Signed-off-by: Ze Huang <huangze@whut.edu.cn>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml
> index 0b462eb6dfe169a292bf716503c03d029f1ac7ee..f4e0da0bf7fa30af5132644109dbd371ddfc0228 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ properties:
> maxItems: 1
>
> patternProperties:
> - '-pins$':
> + '-cfg$':
> type: object
> additionalProperties: false
> description:
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ patternProperties:
> pinctrl groups available on the machine.
>
> patternProperties:
> - '-cfg$':
> + '-pins$':
> type: object
> allOf:
> - $ref: /schemas/pinctrl/pincfg-node.yaml
> @@ -112,8 +112,8 @@ examples:
> compatible = "canaan,k230-pinctrl";
> reg = <0x91105000 0x100>;
>
> - uart2-pins {
> - uart2-pins-cfg {
> + uart2-cfg {
> + uart2-pins {
> pinmux = <0x503>, /* uart2 txd */
> <0x603>; /* uart2 rxd */
> slew-rate = <0>;
>
> ---
> base-commit: 0a4b866d08c6adaea2f4592d31edac6deeb4dcbd
> change-id: 20250526-k230-binding-fix-3125ff43f930
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Ze Huang <huangze@whut.edu.cn>
>
On 5/27/25 10:36 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 12:23:35AM +0800, Ze Huang wrote:
>> Rename child node name patterns to align with conventions.
>>
>> uart0-pins => uart0-cfg
>> uart0-cfg uart0-pins
>>
>> This avoids potential confusion and improves consistency with existing
>> bindings like sophgo,sg2042-pinctrl and starfive,jh7110-aon-pinctrl.
>>
>> Fixes: 561f3e9d21a1 ("dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add support for canaan,k230 SoC")
> You're changing something merged in October of last year, which is an
> ABI break, for what seems like a cosmetic change to me. What makes this
> worth it? Consistency with some devices by other vendors isn't a strong
> argument I don't think.
Thanks for the feedback.
You're right - this change would introduce an ABI break just for naming
consistency, there’s no strong functional benefit.
>> Signed-off-by: Ze Huang <huangze@whut.edu.cn>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml
>> index 0b462eb6dfe169a292bf716503c03d029f1ac7ee..f4e0da0bf7fa30af5132644109dbd371ddfc0228 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml
>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ properties:
>> maxItems: 1
>>
>> patternProperties:
>> - '-pins$':
>> + '-cfg$':
>> type: object
>> additionalProperties: false
>> description:
>> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ patternProperties:
>> pinctrl groups available on the machine.
>>
>> patternProperties:
>> - '-cfg$':
>> + '-pins$':
>> type: object
>> allOf:
>> - $ref: /schemas/pinctrl/pincfg-node.yaml
>> @@ -112,8 +112,8 @@ examples:
>> compatible = "canaan,k230-pinctrl";
>> reg = <0x91105000 0x100>;
>>
>> - uart2-pins {
>> - uart2-pins-cfg {
>> + uart2-cfg {
>> + uart2-pins {
>> pinmux = <0x503>, /* uart2 txd */
>> <0x603>; /* uart2 rxd */
>> slew-rate = <0>;
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: 0a4b866d08c6adaea2f4592d31edac6deeb4dcbd
>> change-id: 20250526-k230-binding-fix-3125ff43f930
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Ze Huang <huangze@whut.edu.cn>
>>
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.