When the current running task is pushed using stop class mechanism, the
new CPU that going to be chosen shouldn't be a parked CPU. 

Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 62b3416f5e43..9ec12f9b3b08 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3526,7 +3526,7 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
 		nodemask = cpumask_of_node(nid);
 
 		/* Look for allowed, online CPU in same node. */
-		for_each_cpu(dest_cpu, nodemask) {
+		for_each_cpu_andnot(dest_cpu, nodemask, cpu_parked_mask) {
 			if (is_cpu_allowed(p, dest_cpu))
 				return dest_cpu;
 		}
@@ -3534,7 +3534,7 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
 
 	for (;;) {
 		/* Any allowed, online CPU? */
-		for_each_cpu(dest_cpu, p->cpus_ptr) {
+		for_each_cpu_andnot(dest_cpu, p->cpus_ptr, cpu_parked_mask) {
 			if (!is_cpu_allowed(p, dest_cpu))
 				continue;
 
-- 
2.39.3

On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 11:44:45PM +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> When the current running task is pushed using stop class mechanism, the
> new CPU that going to be chosen shouldn't be a parked CPU. 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/core.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 62b3416f5e43..9ec12f9b3b08 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -3526,7 +3526,7 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
>  		nodemask = cpumask_of_node(nid);
>  
>  		/* Look for allowed, online CPU in same node. */
> -		for_each_cpu(dest_cpu, nodemask) {
> +		for_each_cpu_andnot(dest_cpu, nodemask, cpu_parked_mask) {
>  			if (is_cpu_allowed(p, dest_cpu))
>  				return dest_cpu;
>  		}
> @@ -3534,7 +3534,7 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
>  
>  	for (;;) {
>  		/* Any allowed, online CPU? */
> -		for_each_cpu(dest_cpu, p->cpus_ptr) {
> +		for_each_cpu_andnot(dest_cpu, p->cpus_ptr, cpu_parked_mask) {
>  			if (!is_cpu_allowed(p, dest_cpu))
>  				continue;

You test for online and dying CPUs in the is_cpu_allowed(). Why this
new 'parked' creature is different?

On 5/27/25 20:29, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 11:44:45PM +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
>> When the current running task is pushed using stop class mechanism, the
>> new CPU that going to be chosen shouldn't be a parked CPU.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   kernel/sched/core.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> index 62b3416f5e43..9ec12f9b3b08 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> @@ -3526,7 +3526,7 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
>>   		nodemask = cpumask_of_node(nid);
>>   
>>   		/* Look for allowed, online CPU in same node. */
>> -		for_each_cpu(dest_cpu, nodemask) {
>> +		for_each_cpu_andnot(dest_cpu, nodemask, cpu_parked_mask) {
>>   			if (is_cpu_allowed(p, dest_cpu))
>>   				return dest_cpu;
>>   		}
>> @@ -3534,7 +3534,7 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
>>   
>>   	for (;;) {
>>   		/* Any allowed, online CPU? */
>> -		for_each_cpu(dest_cpu, p->cpus_ptr) {
>> +		for_each_cpu_andnot(dest_cpu, p->cpus_ptr, cpu_parked_mask) {
>>   			if (!is_cpu_allowed(p, dest_cpu))
>>   				continue;
> 
> You test for online and dying CPUs in the is_cpu_allowed(). Why this
> new 'parked' creature is different?

Agreed. Let me try move that logic into is_cpu_allowed.