From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Previously we decoded the AER Error Source ID in two places. Consolidate
them so both places use aer_print_port_info(). Add a "details" parameter
so we can add a note when we didn't find any downstream devices with errors
logged in their AER Capability.
When we didn't read any error details from the source device, we logged two
messages: one in aer_isr_one_error() and another in find_source_device().
Since they both contain the same information, only log the first one when
when find_source_device() has found error details.
This changes the dmesg logging when we found no devices with errors logged:
- pci 0000:00:01.0: AER: Correctable error message received from 0000:02:00.0
- pci 0000:00:01.0: AER: found no error details for 0000:02:00.0
+ pci 0000:00:01.0: AER: Correctable error message received from 0000:02:00.0 (no details found)
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
---
drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
index a1cf8c7ef628..b8494ccd935b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
@@ -733,16 +733,17 @@ void aer_print_error(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info)
info->severity, info->tlp_header_valid, &info->tlp);
}
-static void aer_print_port_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info)
+static void aer_print_port_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info,
+ const char *details)
{
u8 bus = info->id >> 8;
u8 devfn = info->id & 0xff;
- pci_info(dev, "%s%s error message received from %04x:%02x:%02x.%d\n",
+ pci_info(dev, "%s%s error message received from %04x:%02x:%02x.%d%s\n",
info->multi_error_valid ? "Multiple " : "",
aer_error_severity_string[info->severity],
pci_domain_nr(dev->bus), bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn),
- PCI_FUNC(devfn));
+ PCI_FUNC(devfn), details);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER
@@ -926,13 +927,13 @@ static bool find_source_device(struct pci_dev *parent,
else
pci_walk_bus(parent->subordinate, find_device_iter, e_info);
+ /*
+ * If we didn't find any devices with errors logged in the AER
+ * Capability, just print the Error Source ID from the Root Port or
+ * RCEC that received an ERR_* Message.
+ */
if (!e_info->error_dev_num) {
- u8 bus = e_info->id >> 8;
- u8 devfn = e_info->id & 0xff;
-
- pci_info(parent, "found no error details for %04x:%02x:%02x.%d\n",
- pci_domain_nr(parent->bus), bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn),
- PCI_FUNC(devfn));
+ aer_print_port_info(parent, e_info, " (no details found)");
return false;
}
return true;
@@ -1297,10 +1298,11 @@ static void aer_isr_one_error(struct aer_rpc *rpc,
e_info.multi_error_valid = 1;
else
e_info.multi_error_valid = 0;
- aer_print_port_info(pdev, &e_info);
- if (find_source_device(pdev, &e_info))
+ if (find_source_device(pdev, &e_info)) {
+ aer_print_port_info(pdev, &e_info, "");
aer_process_err_devices(&e_info);
+ }
}
if (e_src->status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_UNCOR_RCV) {
@@ -1316,10 +1318,10 @@ static void aer_isr_one_error(struct aer_rpc *rpc,
else
e_info.multi_error_valid = 0;
- aer_print_port_info(pdev, &e_info);
-
- if (find_source_device(pdev, &e_info))
+ if (find_source_device(pdev, &e_info)) {
+ aer_print_port_info(pdev, &e_info, "");
aer_process_err_devices(&e_info);
+ }
}
}
--
2.43.0
On Mon, 19 May 2025, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>
> Previously we decoded the AER Error Source ID in two places. Consolidate
> them so both places use aer_print_port_info(). Add a "details" parameter
> so we can add a note when we didn't find any downstream devices with errors
> logged in their AER Capability.
>
> When we didn't read any error details from the source device, we logged two
> messages: one in aer_isr_one_error() and another in find_source_device().
> Since they both contain the same information, only log the first one when
> when find_source_device() has found error details.
>
> This changes the dmesg logging when we found no devices with errors logged:
>
> - pci 0000:00:01.0: AER: Correctable error message received from 0000:02:00.0
> - pci 0000:00:01.0: AER: found no error details for 0000:02:00.0
> + pci 0000:00:01.0: AER: Correctable error message received from 0000:02:00.0 (no details found)
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> index a1cf8c7ef628..b8494ccd935b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> @@ -733,16 +733,17 @@ void aer_print_error(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info)
> info->severity, info->tlp_header_valid, &info->tlp);
> }
>
> -static void aer_print_port_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info)
> +static void aer_print_port_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info,
> + const char *details)
> {
> u8 bus = info->id >> 8;
> u8 devfn = info->id & 0xff;
>
> - pci_info(dev, "%s%s error message received from %04x:%02x:%02x.%d\n",
> + pci_info(dev, "%s%s error message received from %04x:%02x:%02x.%d%s\n",
> info->multi_error_valid ? "Multiple " : "",
> aer_error_severity_string[info->severity],
> pci_domain_nr(dev->bus), bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn),
> - PCI_FUNC(devfn));
> + PCI_FUNC(devfn), details);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER
> @@ -926,13 +927,13 @@ static bool find_source_device(struct pci_dev *parent,
> else
> pci_walk_bus(parent->subordinate, find_device_iter, e_info);
>
> + /*
> + * If we didn't find any devices with errors logged in the AER
> + * Capability, just print the Error Source ID from the Root Port or
> + * RCEC that received an ERR_* Message.
> + */
> if (!e_info->error_dev_num) {
> - u8 bus = e_info->id >> 8;
> - u8 devfn = e_info->id & 0xff;
> -
> - pci_info(parent, "found no error details for %04x:%02x:%02x.%d\n",
> - pci_domain_nr(parent->bus), bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn),
> - PCI_FUNC(devfn));
> + aer_print_port_info(parent, e_info, " (no details found)");
> return false;
> }
> return true;
> @@ -1297,10 +1298,11 @@ static void aer_isr_one_error(struct aer_rpc *rpc,
> e_info.multi_error_valid = 1;
> else
> e_info.multi_error_valid = 0;
> - aer_print_port_info(pdev, &e_info);
>
> - if (find_source_device(pdev, &e_info))
> + if (find_source_device(pdev, &e_info)) {
> + aer_print_port_info(pdev, &e_info, "");
> aer_process_err_devices(&e_info);
> + }
> }
>
> if (e_src->status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_UNCOR_RCV) {
> @@ -1316,10 +1318,10 @@ static void aer_isr_one_error(struct aer_rpc *rpc,
> else
> e_info.multi_error_valid = 0;
>
> - aer_print_port_info(pdev, &e_info);
> -
> - if (find_source_device(pdev, &e_info))
> + if (find_source_device(pdev, &e_info)) {
> + aer_print_port_info(pdev, &e_info, "");
> aer_process_err_devices(&e_info);
> + }
> }
> }
>
>
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
--
i.
Hi,
On 5/19/25 2:35 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>
> Previously we decoded the AER Error Source ID in two places. Consolidate
> them so both places use aer_print_port_info(). Add a "details" parameter
> so we can add a note when we didn't find any downstream devices with errors
> logged in their AER Capability.
>
> When we didn't read any error details from the source device, we logged two
> messages: one in aer_isr_one_error() and another in find_source_device().
> Since they both contain the same information, only log the first one when
> when find_source_device() has found error details.
/s/when//
>
> This changes the dmesg logging when we found no devices with errors logged:
>
> - pci 0000:00:01.0: AER: Correctable error message received from 0000:02:00.0
> - pci 0000:00:01.0: AER: found no error details for 0000:02:00.0
> + pci 0000:00:01.0: AER: Correctable error message received from 0000:02:00.0 (no details found)
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> index a1cf8c7ef628..b8494ccd935b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> @@ -733,16 +733,17 @@ void aer_print_error(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info)
> info->severity, info->tlp_header_valid, &info->tlp);
> }
>
> -static void aer_print_port_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info)
> +static void aer_print_port_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info,
> + const char *details)
> {
> u8 bus = info->id >> 8;
> u8 devfn = info->id & 0xff;
>
> - pci_info(dev, "%s%s error message received from %04x:%02x:%02x.%d\n",
> + pci_info(dev, "%s%s error message received from %04x:%02x:%02x.%d%s\n",
Instead of relying on the callers, why not add a space before details here?
> info->multi_error_valid ? "Multiple " : "",
> aer_error_severity_string[info->severity],
> pci_domain_nr(dev->bus), bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn),
> - PCI_FUNC(devfn));
> + PCI_FUNC(devfn), details);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER
> @@ -926,13 +927,13 @@ static bool find_source_device(struct pci_dev *parent,
> else
> pci_walk_bus(parent->subordinate, find_device_iter, e_info);
>
> + /*
> + * If we didn't find any devices with errors logged in the AER
> + * Capability, just print the Error Source ID from the Root Port or
> + * RCEC that received an ERR_* Message.
> + */
> if (!e_info->error_dev_num) {
> - u8 bus = e_info->id >> 8;
> - u8 devfn = e_info->id & 0xff;
> -
> - pci_info(parent, "found no error details for %04x:%02x:%02x.%d\n",
> - pci_domain_nr(parent->bus), bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn),
> - PCI_FUNC(devfn));
> + aer_print_port_info(parent, e_info, " (no details found)");
> return false;
> }
> return true;
> @@ -1297,10 +1298,11 @@ static void aer_isr_one_error(struct aer_rpc *rpc,
> e_info.multi_error_valid = 1;
> else
> e_info.multi_error_valid = 0;
> - aer_print_port_info(pdev, &e_info);
>
Instead of printing the error information in find_source_device() (a helper function), I think it be better to print it here (the error handler). source_found = find_source_device(pdev, &e_info); aer_print_port_info(pdev, &e_info, source_found? "" : "(no details found) " );
if (source_found) aer_process_err_devices(&e_info)
> - if (find_source_device(pdev, &e_info))
> + if (find_source_device(pdev, &e_info)) {
> + aer_print_port_info(pdev, &e_info, "");
> aer_process_err_devices(&e_info);
> + }
> }
>
> if (e_src->status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_UNCOR_RCV) {
> @@ -1316,10 +1318,10 @@ static void aer_isr_one_error(struct aer_rpc *rpc,
> else
> e_info.multi_error_valid = 0;
>
> - aer_print_port_info(pdev, &e_info);
> -
> - if (find_source_device(pdev, &e_info))
> + if (find_source_device(pdev, &e_info)) {
> + aer_print_port_info(pdev, &e_info, "");
> aer_process_err_devices(&e_info);
> + }
> }
> }
>
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 04:39:19PM -0700, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
> On 5/19/25 2:35 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> >
> > Previously we decoded the AER Error Source ID in two places. Consolidate
> > them so both places use aer_print_port_info(). Add a "details" parameter
> > so we can add a note when we didn't find any downstream devices with errors
> > logged in their AER Capability.
> >
> > When we didn't read any error details from the source device, we logged two
> > messages: one in aer_isr_one_error() and another in find_source_device().
> > Since they both contain the same information, only log the first one when
> > when find_source_device() has found error details.
> /s/when//
Fixed, thanks!
> > - pci_info(dev, "%s%s error message received from %04x:%02x:%02x.%d\n",
> > + pci_info(dev, "%s%s error message received from %04x:%02x:%02x.%d%s\n",
>
> Instead of relying on the callers, why not add a space before details here?
Could, but I don't like adding an extra space at the end of the line
when the caller passes "". The extra space could make the line wrap
unnecessarily.
> > info->multi_error_valid ? "Multiple " : "",
> > aer_error_severity_string[info->severity],
> > pci_domain_nr(dev->bus), bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn),
> > - PCI_FUNC(devfn));
> > + PCI_FUNC(devfn), details);
> > }
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER
> > @@ -926,13 +927,13 @@ static bool find_source_device(struct pci_dev *parent,
> > else
> > pci_walk_bus(parent->subordinate, find_device_iter, e_info);
> > + /*
> > + * If we didn't find any devices with errors logged in the AER
> > + * Capability, just print the Error Source ID from the Root Port or
> > + * RCEC that received an ERR_* Message.
> > + */
> > if (!e_info->error_dev_num) {
> > - u8 bus = e_info->id >> 8;
> > - u8 devfn = e_info->id & 0xff;
> > -
> > - pci_info(parent, "found no error details for %04x:%02x:%02x.%d\n",
> > - pci_domain_nr(parent->bus), bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn),
> > - PCI_FUNC(devfn));
> > + aer_print_port_info(parent, e_info, " (no details found)");
> > return false;
> > }
> > return true;
> > @@ -1297,10 +1298,11 @@ static void aer_isr_one_error(struct aer_rpc *rpc,
> > e_info.multi_error_valid = 1;
> > else
> > e_info.multi_error_valid = 0;
> > - aer_print_port_info(pdev, &e_info);
>
> Instead of printing the error information in find_source_device() (a helper function), I think it be better to print it here (the error handler). source_found = find_source_device(pdev, &e_info); aer_print_port_info(pdev, &e_info, source_found? "" : "(no details found) " );
>
> if (source_found) aer_process_err_devices(&e_info)
Great idea, thanks! That looks much nicer.
> > - if (find_source_device(pdev, &e_info))
> > + if (find_source_device(pdev, &e_info)) {
> > + aer_print_port_info(pdev, &e_info, "");
> > aer_process_err_devices(&e_info);
> > + }
> > }
> > if (e_src->status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_UNCOR_RCV) {
> > @@ -1316,10 +1318,10 @@ static void aer_isr_one_error(struct aer_rpc *rpc,
> > else
> > e_info.multi_error_valid = 0;
> > - aer_print_port_info(pdev, &e_info);
> > -
> > - if (find_source_device(pdev, &e_info))
> > + if (find_source_device(pdev, &e_info)) {
> > + aer_print_port_info(pdev, &e_info, "");
> > aer_process_err_devices(&e_info);
> > + }
> > }
> > }
>
> --
> Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
> Linux Kernel Developer
>
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.