[PATCH] docs: filesystems: removed repeated word

Nidhish Chauhan posted 1 patch 7 months, 1 week ago
There is a newer version of this series
Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] docs: filesystems: removed repeated word
Posted by Nidhish Chauhan 7 months, 1 week ago
Removed a repeated word 'at' from journalling.rst at line no. 96 in
filesystems directory.

Signed-off-by: Nidhish Chauhan <solemnsquire@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst
index 863e93e623f7..2825f6c030c2 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ easily as on jbd2_journal_start().
 
 Try to reserve the right number of blocks the first time. ;-). This will
 be the maximum number of blocks you are going to touch in this
-transaction. I advise having a look at at least ext4_jbd.h to see the
+transaction. I advise having a look at least ext4_jbd.h to see the
 basis on which ext4 uses to make these decisions.
 
 Another wriggle to watch out for is your on-disk block allocation
-- 
2.49.0
Re: [PATCH] docs: filesystems: removed repeated word
Posted by Shuah Khan 7 months ago
On 5/16/25 10:46, Nidhish Chauhan wrote:
> Removed a repeated word 'at' from journalling.rst at line no. 96 in
> filesystems directory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nidhish Chauhan <solemnsquire@gmail.com>
> ---
>   Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst
> index 863e93e623f7..2825f6c030c2 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ easily as on jbd2_journal_start().
>   
>   Try to reserve the right number of blocks the first time. ;-). This will
>   be the maximum number of blocks you are going to touch in this
> -transaction. I advise having a look at at least ext4_jbd.h to see the
> +transaction. I advise having a look at least ext4_jbd.h to see the
>   basis on which ext4 uses to make these decisions.
>   
>   Another wriggle to watch out for is your on-disk block allocation

Please run get_maintainers.pl to get the correct list of recipients for
this patch.

thanks,
-- Shuah