scripts/headers_install.sh | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
The current implementation only handles C89 style comments (/*... */) in
the code, and there are false positives for C99 style comments (//...).
This patch fixes this issue.
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>
---
scripts/headers_install.sh | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/scripts/headers_install.sh b/scripts/headers_install.sh
index 6bbccb43f7e7..41722bcc8668 100755
--- a/scripts/headers_install.sh
+++ b/scripts/headers_install.sh
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ scripts/unifdef -U__KERNEL__ -D__EXPORTED_HEADERS__ $TMPFILE > $OUTFILE
# Remove /* ... */ style comments, and find CONFIG_ references in code
configs=$(sed -e '
:comment
+ s://.*::
s:/\*[^*][^*]*:/*:
s:/\*\*\**\([^/]\):/*\1:
t comment
--
2.25.1
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:00:56AM +0800, Wen Yang wrote: > The current implementation only handles C89 style comments (/*... */) in > the code, and there are false positives for C99 style comments (//...). > > This patch fixes this issue. > > Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev> > --- > scripts/headers_install.sh | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/scripts/headers_install.sh b/scripts/headers_install.sh > index 6bbccb43f7e7..41722bcc8668 100755 > --- a/scripts/headers_install.sh > +++ b/scripts/headers_install.sh > @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ scripts/unifdef -U__KERNEL__ -D__EXPORTED_HEADERS__ $TMPFILE > $OUTFILE > # Remove /* ... */ style comments, and find CONFIG_ references in code > configs=$(sed -e ' > :comment > + s://.*:: > s:/\*[^*][^*]*:/*: > s:/\*\*\**\([^/]\):/*\1: > t comment > -- > 2.25.1 thanks. The patch looks good to me, but I cannot find any false positives. Have you found any concrete? Kind regards, Nicolas
On 5/15/25 19:32, Nicolas Schier wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:00:56AM +0800, Wen Yang wrote: >> The current implementation only handles C89 style comments (/*... */) in >> the code, and there are false positives for C99 style comments (//...). >> >> This patch fixes this issue. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev> >> --- >> scripts/headers_install.sh | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/scripts/headers_install.sh b/scripts/headers_install.sh >> index 6bbccb43f7e7..41722bcc8668 100755 >> --- a/scripts/headers_install.sh >> +++ b/scripts/headers_install.sh >> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ scripts/unifdef -U__KERNEL__ -D__EXPORTED_HEADERS__ $TMPFILE > $OUTFILE >> # Remove /* ... */ style comments, and find CONFIG_ references in code >> configs=$(sed -e ' >> :comment >> + s://.*:: >> s:/\*[^*][^*]*:/*: >> s:/\*\*\**\([^/]\):/*\1: >> t comment >> -- >> 2.25.1 > > thanks. The patch looks good to me, but I cannot find any false > positives. Have you found any concrete? > Thanks. We have enhanced dmabuf on our SoC platform and modified the include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h file, and then found this issue. -- Best wishes, Wen
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:45 AM Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev> wrote: > > > > On 5/15/25 19:32, Nicolas Schier wrote: > > On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:00:56AM +0800, Wen Yang wrote: > >> The current implementation only handles C89 style comments (/*... */) in > >> the code, and there are false positives for C99 style comments (//...). > >> > >> This patch fixes this issue. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev> > >> --- > >> scripts/headers_install.sh | 1 + > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/scripts/headers_install.sh b/scripts/headers_install.sh > >> index 6bbccb43f7e7..41722bcc8668 100755 > >> --- a/scripts/headers_install.sh > >> +++ b/scripts/headers_install.sh > >> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ scripts/unifdef -U__KERNEL__ -D__EXPORTED_HEADERS__ $TMPFILE > $OUTFILE > >> # Remove /* ... */ style comments, and find CONFIG_ references in code > >> configs=$(sed -e ' > >> :comment > >> + s://.*:: > >> s:/\*[^*][^*]*:/*: > >> s:/\*\*\**\([^/]\):/*\1: > >> t comment > >> -- > >> 2.25.1 > > > > thanks. The patch looks good to me, but I cannot find any false > > positives. Have you found any concrete? > > > > Thanks. We have enhanced dmabuf on our SoC platform and modified the > include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h file, and then found this issue. The SPDX License Identifier in UAPI headers use /* ... */, and never C++ style comments. In my understanding, the idea behind this is UAPI headers follow more strict C. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.