From: Parth Pancholi <parth.pancholi@toradex.com>

The ACSPCIE1 module on TI's J784S4 SoC is capable of driving the reference
clock required by the PCIe Endpoint device. It is an alternative to on-
board and external reference clock generators.
Add the device-tree node for the same.

Signed-off-by: Parth Pancholi <parth.pancholi@toradex.com>
---
v3: Split SoC support; board-specific changes to follow with Toradex Aquila AM69 upstream addition.
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250404101234.2671147-1-parth105105@gmail.com/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250320122259.525613-1-parth105105@gmail.com/
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi
index 363d68fec387..d17f365947ed 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi
@@ -131,6 +131,11 @@ acspcie0_proxy_ctrl: clock-controller@1a090 {
 			compatible = "ti,j784s4-acspcie-proxy-ctrl", "syscon";
 			reg = <0x1a090 0x4>;
 		};
+
+		acspcie1_proxy_ctrl: clock-controller@1a094 {
+			compatible = "ti,j784s4-acspcie-proxy-ctrl", "syscon";
+			reg = <0x1a094 0x4>;
+		};
 	};
 
 	main_ehrpwm0: pwm@3000000 {
-- 
2.34.1

Hi Parth Pancholi,

On Tue, 13 May 2025 17:21:55 +0200, Parth Pancholi wrote:
> The ACSPCIE1 module on TI's J784S4 SoC is capable of driving the reference
> clock required by the PCIe Endpoint device. It is an alternative to on-
> board and external reference clock generators.
> Add the device-tree node for the same.
> 
> 

I have applied the following to branch ti-k3-dts-next on [1].
Thank you!

[1/1] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common: Add ACSPCIE1 node
      commit: abba0c4845ea110a10b4f0dec5351fef17aaa4be

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent up the chain during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a relevant bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ti/linux.git
--
Vignesh