SAFETY comment in rustdoc example was just 'TODO'. Fixed.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Mangold <oliver.mangold@pm.me>
---
rust/kernel/types.rs | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rust/kernel/types.rs b/rust/kernel/types.rs
index d7fa8934c545f46a646ca900ab8957a04b0ad34d..33d2b4e4a87b991c6d934f4e8d2c6c71a15b1bcb 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/types.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/types.rs
@@ -498,7 +498,9 @@ pub unsafe fn from_raw(ptr: NonNull<T>) -> Self {
///
/// struct Empty {}
///
- /// # // SAFETY: TODO.
+ /// // SAFETY: The `RefCounted` implementation for `Empty` does not count references
+ /// // and never frees the underlying object. Thus we can act as having a
+ /// // refcount on the object that we pass to the newly created `ARef`.
/// unsafe impl RefCounted for Empty {
/// fn inc_ref(&self) {}
/// unsafe fn dec_ref(_obj: NonNull<Self>) {}
@@ -506,7 +508,7 @@ pub unsafe fn from_raw(ptr: NonNull<T>) -> Self {
///
/// let mut data = Empty {};
/// let ptr = NonNull::<Empty>::new(&mut data).unwrap();
- /// # // SAFETY: TODO.
+ /// // SAFETY: We keep `data` around longer than the `ARef`.
/// let data_ref: ARef<Empty> = unsafe { ARef::from_raw(ptr) };
/// let raw_ptr: NonNull<Empty> = ARef::into_raw(data_ref);
///
--
2.49.0
"Oliver Mangold" <oliver.mangold@pm.me> writes:
> SAFETY comment in rustdoc example was just 'TODO'. Fixed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Mangold <oliver.mangold@pm.me>
> ---
> rust/kernel/types.rs | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/types.rs b/rust/kernel/types.rs
> index d7fa8934c545f46a646ca900ab8957a04b0ad34d..33d2b4e4a87b991c6d934f4e8d2c6c71a15b1bcb 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/types.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/types.rs
> @@ -498,7 +498,9 @@ pub unsafe fn from_raw(ptr: NonNull<T>) -> Self {
> ///
> /// struct Empty {}
> ///
> - /// # // SAFETY: TODO.
> + /// // SAFETY: The `RefCounted` implementation for `Empty` does not count references
> + /// // and never frees the underlying object. Thus we can act as having a
> + /// // refcount on the object that we pass to the newly created `ARef`.
> /// unsafe impl RefCounted for Empty {
> /// fn inc_ref(&self) {}
> /// unsafe fn dec_ref(_obj: NonNull<Self>) {}
> @@ -506,7 +508,7 @@ pub unsafe fn from_raw(ptr: NonNull<T>) -> Self {
> ///
> /// let mut data = Empty {};
> /// let ptr = NonNull::<Empty>::new(&mut data).unwrap();
> - /// # // SAFETY: TODO.
> + /// // SAFETY: We keep `data` around longer than the `ARef`.
I still think this applies:
>> How about:
>>
>> The `RefCounted` implementation for `Empty` does not count references
>> and never frees the underlying object. Thus we can act as having a
>> refcount on the object that we pass to the newly created `ARef`.
>>
> /// let data_ref: ARef<Empty> = unsafe { ARef::from_raw(ptr) };
> /// let raw_ptr: NonNull<Empty> = ARef::into_raw(data_ref);
> ///
Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg
On 250502 1241, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/types.rs b/rust/kernel/types.rs
> > index d7fa8934c545f46a646ca900ab8957a04b0ad34d..33d2b4e4a87b991c6d934f4e8d2c6c71a15b1bcb 100644
> > --- a/rust/kernel/types.rs
> > +++ b/rust/kernel/types.rs
> > @@ -498,7 +498,9 @@ pub unsafe fn from_raw(ptr: NonNull<T>) -> Self {
> > ///
> > /// struct Empty {}
> > ///
> > - /// # // SAFETY: TODO.
> > + /// // SAFETY: The `RefCounted` implementation for `Empty` does not count references
> > + /// // and never frees the underlying object. Thus we can act as having a
> > + /// // refcount on the object that we pass to the newly created `ARef`.
> > /// unsafe impl RefCounted for Empty {
> > /// fn inc_ref(&self) {}
> > /// unsafe fn dec_ref(_obj: NonNull<Self>) {}
> > @@ -506,7 +508,7 @@ pub unsafe fn from_raw(ptr: NonNull<T>) -> Self {
> > ///
> > /// let mut data = Empty {};
> > /// let ptr = NonNull::<Empty>::new(&mut data).unwrap();
> > - /// # // SAFETY: TODO.
> > + /// // SAFETY: We keep `data` around longer than the `ARef`.
>
> I still think this applies:
>
> >> How about:
> >>
> >> The `RefCounted` implementation for `Empty` does not count references
> >> and never frees the underlying object. Thus we can act as having a
> >> refcount on the object that we pass to the newly created `ARef`.
> >>
Hi Andreas,
I agree. Sorry, I just messed up the fix. Your wording landed in the
previous to-be-fixed unsafe comment, as you can see.
Happens when you are too much in a hurry and didn't touch the patch for
too long :/
I will fix it in the next version.
Best,
Oliver
"Oliver Mangold" <oliver.mangold@pm.me> writes:
> On 250502 1241, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>> >
>> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/types.rs b/rust/kernel/types.rs
>> > index d7fa8934c545f46a646ca900ab8957a04b0ad34d..33d2b4e4a87b991c6d934f4e8d2c6c71a15b1bcb 100644
>> > --- a/rust/kernel/types.rs
>> > +++ b/rust/kernel/types.rs
>> > @@ -498,7 +498,9 @@ pub unsafe fn from_raw(ptr: NonNull<T>) -> Self {
>> > ///
>> > /// struct Empty {}
>> > ///
>> > - /// # // SAFETY: TODO.
>> > + /// // SAFETY: The `RefCounted` implementation for `Empty` does not count references
>> > + /// // and never frees the underlying object. Thus we can act as having a
>> > + /// // refcount on the object that we pass to the newly created `ARef`.
>> > /// unsafe impl RefCounted for Empty {
>> > /// fn inc_ref(&self) {}
>> > /// unsafe fn dec_ref(_obj: NonNull<Self>) {}
>> > @@ -506,7 +508,7 @@ pub unsafe fn from_raw(ptr: NonNull<T>) -> Self {
>> > ///
>> > /// let mut data = Empty {};
>> > /// let ptr = NonNull::<Empty>::new(&mut data).unwrap();
>> > - /// # // SAFETY: TODO.
>> > + /// // SAFETY: We keep `data` around longer than the `ARef`.
>>
>> I still think this applies:
>>
>> >> How about:
>> >>
>> >> The `RefCounted` implementation for `Empty` does not count references
>> >> and never frees the underlying object. Thus we can act as having a
>> >> refcount on the object that we pass to the newly created `ARef`.
>> >>
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> I agree. Sorry, I just messed up the fix. Your wording landed in the
> previous to-be-fixed unsafe comment, as you can see.
>
> Happens when you are too much in a hurry and didn't touch the patch for
> too long :/
>
> I will fix it in the next version.
Cool! Also check my response to v9: https://lore.kernel.org/all/87cycrz1pa.fsf@kernel.org
Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.