drivers/mux/adgs1408.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
Use spi_get_device_match_data() helper to simplify a bit the driver.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
Resending patch from almost a year ago - there was no response to pings
either.
Is mux subsystem still alive? Shall it be marked as orphaned?
drivers/mux/adgs1408.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mux/adgs1408.c b/drivers/mux/adgs1408.c
index 22ed051eb1a4..5386cfedcb06 100644
--- a/drivers/mux/adgs1408.c
+++ b/drivers/mux/adgs1408.c
@@ -59,9 +59,7 @@ static int adgs1408_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
s32 idle_state;
int ret;
- chip_id = (enum adgs1408_chip_id)device_get_match_data(dev);
- if (!chip_id)
- chip_id = spi_get_device_id(spi)->driver_data;
+ chip_id = (enum adgs1408_chip_id)spi_get_device_match_data(spi);
mux_chip = devm_mux_chip_alloc(dev, 1, 0);
if (IS_ERR(mux_chip))
--
2.45.2
On Thu, 2025-05-01 at 19:37 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Use spi_get_device_match_data() helper to simplify a bit the driver. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > --- > Reviewed-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com> > Resending patch from almost a year ago - there was no response to pings > either. > > Is mux subsystem still alive? Shall it be marked as orphaned? > > > drivers/mux/adgs1408.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mux/adgs1408.c b/drivers/mux/adgs1408.c > index 22ed051eb1a4..5386cfedcb06 100644 > --- a/drivers/mux/adgs1408.c > +++ b/drivers/mux/adgs1408.c > @@ -59,9 +59,7 @@ static int adgs1408_probe(struct spi_device *spi) > s32 idle_state; > int ret; > > - chip_id = (enum adgs1408_chip_id)device_get_match_data(dev); > - if (!chip_id) > - chip_id = spi_get_device_id(spi)->driver_data; > + chip_id = (enum adgs1408_chip_id)spi_get_device_match_data(spi); > > mux_chip = devm_mux_chip_alloc(dev, 1, 0); > if (IS_ERR(mux_chip))
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.