[PATCH] [next] selftests/ptrace: Fix spelling mistake "multible" -> "multiple"

Ankit Chauhan posted 1 patch 9 months, 1 week ago
tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/peeksiginfo.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] [next] selftests/ptrace: Fix spelling mistake "multible" -> "multiple"
Posted by Ankit Chauhan 9 months, 1 week ago
Fix the spelling error from "multible" to "multiple".

Signed-off-by: Ankit Chauhan <ankitchauhan2065@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/peeksiginfo.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/peeksiginfo.c b/tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/peeksiginfo.c
index a6884f66dc01..2f345d11e4b8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/peeksiginfo.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/peeksiginfo.c
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 
 	/*
 	 * Dump signal from the process-wide queue.
-	 * The number of signals is not multible to the buffer size
+	 * The number of signals is not multiple to the buffer size
 	 */
 	if (check_direct_path(child, 1, 3))
 		goto out;
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH] [next] selftests/ptrace: Fix spelling mistake "multible" -> "multiple"
Posted by Brigham Campbell 8 months, 3 weeks ago
On Thu May 1, 2025 at 12:03 AM MDT, Ankit Chauhan wrote:
> Fix the spelling error from "multible" to "multiple".
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Chauhan <ankitchauhan2065@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/peeksiginfo.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/peeksiginfo.c b/tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/peeksiginfo.c
> index a6884f66dc01..2f345d11e4b8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/peeksiginfo.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/peeksiginfo.c
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Dump signal from the process-wide queue.
> -	 * The number of signals is not multible to the buffer size
> +	 * The number of signals is not multiple to the buffer size

Excellent work! This could probably be clarified further by fixing the
grammar a little bit (i.e. "... is not a multiple of ...", assuming that
is actually what is meant).

>  	 */
>  	if (check_direct_path(child, 1, 3))
>  		goto out;

Reviewed-by: Brigham Campbell <me@brighamcampbell.com>