fs/eventpoll.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
In commit 0a65bc27bd64 ("eventpoll: Set epoll timeout if it's in the
future"), a bug was introduced causing the loop in ep_poll to hang under
certain circumstances.
When the timeout is non-NULL and ep_schedule_timeout returns false, the
flag timed_out was not set to true. This causes a hang.
Adjust the logic and set timed_out, if needed, fixing the original code.
Reported-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20250426-haben-redeverbot-0b58878ac722@brauner/
Reported-by: Mike Pagano <mpagano@gentoo.org>
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/954806
Reported-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/aBAB_4gQ6O_haAjp@google.com/
Fixes: 0a65bc27bd64 ("eventpoll: Set epoll timeout if it's in the future")
Tested-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
---
fs/eventpoll.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index 4bc264b854c4..1a5d1147f082 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -2111,7 +2111,9 @@ static int ep_poll(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epoll_event __user *events,
write_unlock_irq(&ep->lock);
- if (!eavail && ep_schedule_timeout(to))
+ if (!ep_schedule_timeout(to))
+ timed_out = 1;
+ else if (!eavail)
timed_out = !schedule_hrtimeout_range(to, slack,
HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
base-commit: f520bed25d17bb31c2d2d72b0a785b593a4e3179
--
2.43.0
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 9:22 PM Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com> wrote:
> In commit 0a65bc27bd64 ("eventpoll: Set epoll timeout if it's in the
> future"), a bug was introduced causing the loop in ep_poll to hang under
> certain circumstances.
>
> When the timeout is non-NULL and ep_schedule_timeout returns false, the
> flag timed_out was not set to true. This causes a hang.
>
> Adjust the logic and set timed_out, if needed, fixing the original code.
Hi Joe,
we have been working on the fix at the same time, this is my fix:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20250429185827.3564438-1-max.kellermann@ionos.com/T/#u
I think mine is better because it checks "eavail" before setting
"timed_out", preserving the old behavior (before commit 0a65bc27bd64).
Your version may set "timed_out" and thus does an unnecessary
list_empty() call in the following block. (And maybe it can reset
"evail" to false?)
Max
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 09:28:50PM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 9:22 PM Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com> wrote:
> > In commit 0a65bc27bd64 ("eventpoll: Set epoll timeout if it's in the
> > future"), a bug was introduced causing the loop in ep_poll to hang under
> > certain circumstances.
> >
> > When the timeout is non-NULL and ep_schedule_timeout returns false, the
> > flag timed_out was not set to true. This causes a hang.
> >
> > Adjust the logic and set timed_out, if needed, fixing the original code.
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> we have been working on the fix at the same time, this is my fix:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20250429185827.3564438-1-max.kellermann@ionos.com/T/#u
>
> I think mine is better because it checks "eavail" before setting
> "timed_out", preserving the old behavior (before commit 0a65bc27bd64).
> Your version may set "timed_out" and thus does an unnecessary
> list_empty() call in the following block. (And maybe it can reset
> "evail" to false?)
I think it's up to the maintainers to decide which patch is
preferred; I don't really have a preference.
On Tue 29-04-25 15:34:19, Joe Damato wrote:
> In commit 0a65bc27bd64 ("eventpoll: Set epoll timeout if it's in the
> future"), a bug was introduced causing the loop in ep_poll to hang under
> certain circumstances.
>
> When the timeout is non-NULL and ep_schedule_timeout returns false, the
> flag timed_out was not set to true. This causes a hang.
>
> Adjust the logic and set timed_out, if needed, fixing the original code.
>
> Reported-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20250426-haben-redeverbot-0b58878ac722@brauner/
> Reported-by: Mike Pagano <mpagano@gentoo.org>
> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/954806
> Reported-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/aBAB_4gQ6O_haAjp@google.com/
> Fixes: 0a65bc27bd64 ("eventpoll: Set epoll timeout if it's in the future")
> Tested-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/eventpoll.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
> index 4bc264b854c4..1a5d1147f082 100644
> --- a/fs/eventpoll.c
> +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
> @@ -2111,7 +2111,9 @@ static int ep_poll(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epoll_event __user *events,
>
> write_unlock_irq(&ep->lock);
>
> - if (!eavail && ep_schedule_timeout(to))
> + if (!ep_schedule_timeout(to))
> + timed_out = 1;
> + else if (!eavail)
> timed_out = !schedule_hrtimeout_range(to, slack,
> HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
> __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>
> base-commit: f520bed25d17bb31c2d2d72b0a785b593a4e3179
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.