Use max() to simplify jh7110_tdm_syncdiv() and improve its readability.

Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
---
 sound/soc/starfive/jh7110_tdm.c | 13 +++----------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/starfive/jh7110_tdm.c b/sound/soc/starfive/jh7110_tdm.c
index d38090e68df5..afdcde7df91a 100644
--- a/sound/soc/starfive/jh7110_tdm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/starfive/jh7110_tdm.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <linux/clk.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
+#include <linux/minmax.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of_irq.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
@@ -187,16 +188,8 @@ static int jh7110_tdm_syncdiv(struct jh7110_tdm_dev *tdm)
 {
 	u32 sl, sscale, syncdiv;
 
-	if (tdm->rx.sl >= tdm->tx.sl)
-		sl = tdm->rx.sl;
-	else
-		sl = tdm->tx.sl;
-
-	if (tdm->rx.sscale >= tdm->tx.sscale)
-		sscale = tdm->rx.sscale;
-	else
-		sscale = tdm->tx.sscale;
-
+	sl = max(tdm->rx.sl, tdm->tx.sl);
+	sscale = max(tdm->rx.sscale, tdm->tx.sscale);
 	syncdiv = tdm->pcmclk / tdm->samplerate - 1;
 
 	if ((syncdiv + 1) < (sl * sscale)) {
-- 
2.49.0

On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 15:36:49 +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> Use max() to simplify jh7110_tdm_syncdiv() and improve its readability.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: starfive: Use max() to simplify code in jh7110_tdm_syncdiv()
      commit: 0787a08ae785366b9473905fc8bf23f165a08b8d

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark