tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
It seems that sample_period no used in perf buffer, actually only
wakeup_events valid about events aggregation for wakeup. So remove
it to avoid causing confusion.
Fixes: fb84b8224655 ("libbpf: add perf buffer API")
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 194809da5172..1830e3c011a5 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -13306,7 +13306,6 @@ struct perf_buffer *perf_buffer__new(int map_fd, size_t page_cnt,
attr.config = PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT;
attr.type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE;
attr.sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_RAW;
- attr.sample_period = sample_period;
attr.wakeup_events = sample_period;
p.attr = &attr;
--
2.43.0
在 2025/4/24 00:39, Tao Chen 写道:
ping...
> It seems that sample_period no used in perf buffer, actually only
> wakeup_events valid about events aggregation for wakeup. So remove
> it to avoid causing confusion.
>
> Fixes: fb84b8224655 ("libbpf: add perf buffer API")
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index 194809da5172..1830e3c011a5 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -13306,7 +13306,6 @@ struct perf_buffer *perf_buffer__new(int map_fd, size_t page_cnt,
> attr.config = PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT;
> attr.type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE;
> attr.sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_RAW;
> - attr.sample_period = sample_period;
> attr.wakeup_events = sample_period;
>
> p.attr = &attr;
--
Best Regards
Tao Chen
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 1:48 PM Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev> wrote: > > 在 2025/4/24 00:39, Tao Chen 写道: > > ping... The patch has already been accepted and merged into bpf-next: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/commit/?id=64821d25f05ac468d435e61669ae745ce5a633ea Interestingly, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org didn't send a notification about this. You can check the current status of your patches on Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?delegate=121173&state=* -- Regards Yafang
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 11:19 PM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 1:48 PM Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev> wrote: > > > > 在 2025/4/24 00:39, Tao Chen 写道: > > > > ping... > > The patch has already been accepted and merged into bpf-next: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/commit/?id=64821d25f05ac468d435e61669ae745ce5a633ea > > Interestingly, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org didn't send a > notification about this. Yeah, we had a day or two of patchwork not working. The patch was applied. Sorry, I forgot to reply manually to let everyone know. > > You can check the current status of your patches on Patchwork: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?delegate=121173&state=* > > > -- > Regards > Yafang
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.