arch/x86/include/asm/pgalloc.h | 19 +++++++++++-------- arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_32.c | 4 ++-- arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c | 4 ++-- arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c | 4 ++-- 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Recently _pgd_alloc() was switched from using __get_free_pages() to
pagetable_alloc_noprof(), which might return a compound page in case
the allocation order is larger than 0.
On x86 this will be the case if CONFIG_MITIGATION_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION
is set, even if PTI has been disabled at runtime.
When running as a Xen PV guest (this will always disable PTI), using
a compound page for a PGD will result in VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS being
triggered when the Xen code tries to pin the PGD.
Fix the Xen issue together with the not needed 8k allocation for a
PGD with PTI disabled by replacing PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER with an
inline helper returning the needed order for PGD allocations.
Reported-by: Petr Vaněk <arkamar@atlas.cz>
Fixes: a9b3c355c2e6 ("asm-generic: pgalloc: provide generic __pgd_{alloc,free}")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
---
V2:
- use pgd_allocation_order() instead of PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER (Dave Hansen)
---
arch/x86/include/asm/pgalloc.h | 19 +++++++++++--------
arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_32.c | 4 ++--
arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c | 4 ++--
arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgalloc.h
index a33147520044..c88691b15f3c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgalloc.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgalloc.h
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
#include <linux/mm.h> /* for struct page */
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
+#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
+
#define __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_ALLOC_ONE
#define __HAVE_ARCH_PGD_FREE
#include <asm-generic/pgalloc.h>
@@ -29,16 +31,17 @@ static inline void paravirt_release_pud(unsigned long pfn) {}
static inline void paravirt_release_p4d(unsigned long pfn) {}
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_MITIGATION_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION
/*
- * Instead of one PGD, we acquire two PGDs. Being order-1, it is
- * both 8k in size and 8k-aligned. That lets us just flip bit 12
- * in a pointer to swap between the two 4k halves.
+ * In case of Page Table Isolation active, we acquire two PGDs instead of one.
+ * Being order-1, it is both 8k in size and 8k-aligned. That lets us just
+ * flip bit 12 in a pointer to swap between the two 4k halves.
*/
-#define PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER 1
-#else
-#define PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER 0
-#endif
+static inline unsigned int pgd_allocation_order(void)
+{
+ if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_PTI))
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+}
/*
* Allocate and free page tables.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_32.c
index 80265162aeff..1f325304c4a8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_32.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static void load_segments(void)
static void machine_kexec_free_page_tables(struct kimage *image)
{
- free_pages((unsigned long)image->arch.pgd, PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER);
+ free_pages((unsigned long)image->arch.pgd, pgd_allocation_order());
image->arch.pgd = NULL;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE
free_page((unsigned long)image->arch.pmd0);
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static void machine_kexec_free_page_tables(struct kimage *image)
static int machine_kexec_alloc_page_tables(struct kimage *image)
{
image->arch.pgd = (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO,
- PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER);
+ pgd_allocation_order());
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE
image->arch.pmd0 = (pmd_t *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
image->arch.pmd1 = (pmd_t *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
index a05fcddfc811..f7ae44d3dd9e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ static inline pgd_t *_pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
* We allocate one page for pgd.
*/
if (!SHARED_KERNEL_PMD)
- return __pgd_alloc(mm, PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER);
+ return __pgd_alloc(mm, pgd_allocation_order());
/*
* Now PAE kernel is not running as a Xen domain. We can allocate
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static inline void _pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
static inline pgd_t *_pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
- return __pgd_alloc(mm, PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER);
+ return __pgd_alloc(mm, pgd_allocation_order());
}
static inline void _pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
index ac57259a432b..a4b4ebd41b8f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ int __init efi_alloc_page_tables(void)
gfp_t gfp_mask;
gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO;
- efi_pgd = (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(gfp_mask, PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER);
+ efi_pgd = (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(gfp_mask, pgd_allocation_order());
if (!efi_pgd)
goto fail;
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ int __init efi_alloc_page_tables(void)
if (pgtable_l5_enabled())
free_page((unsigned long)pgd_page_vaddr(*pgd));
free_pgd:
- free_pages((unsigned long)efi_pgd, PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER);
+ free_pages((unsigned long)efi_pgd, pgd_allocation_order());
fail:
return -ENOMEM;
}
--
2.43.0
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 03:17:17PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Recently _pgd_alloc() was switched from using __get_free_pages() to
> pagetable_alloc_noprof(), which might return a compound page in case
> the allocation order is larger than 0.
>
> On x86 this will be the case if CONFIG_MITIGATION_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION
> is set, even if PTI has been disabled at runtime.
>
> When running as a Xen PV guest (this will always disable PTI), using
> a compound page for a PGD will result in VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS being
> triggered when the Xen code tries to pin the PGD.
>
> Fix the Xen issue together with the not needed 8k allocation for a
> PGD with PTI disabled by replacing PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER with an
> inline helper returning the needed order for PGD allocations.
>
> Reported-by: Petr Vaněk <arkamar@atlas.cz>
> Fixes: a9b3c355c2e6 ("asm-generic: pgalloc: provide generic __pgd_{alloc,free}")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> ---
> V2:
> - use pgd_allocation_order() instead of PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER (Dave Hansen)
The patch fixes the reported issue. The following trailers can be
appended to the commit message (as per [1]):
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202541612720-Z_-deOZTOztMXHBh-arkamar@atlas.cz/
Tested-by: Petr Vaněk <arkamar@atlas.cz>
Cheers,
Petr
[1] https://docs.kernel.org/process/5.Posting.html#patch-formatting-and-changelogs
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.