[PATCH perf/core 08/22] uprobes/x86: Add mapping for optimized uprobe trampolines

Jiri Olsa posted 22 patches 7 months, 4 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH perf/core 08/22] uprobes/x86: Add mapping for optimized uprobe trampolines
Posted by Jiri Olsa 7 months, 4 weeks ago
Adding support to add special mapping for for user space trampoline
with following functions:

  uprobe_trampoline_get - find or add uprobe_trampoline
  uprobe_trampoline_put - remove or destroy uprobe_trampoline

The user space trampoline is exported as arch specific user space special
mapping through tramp_mapping, which is initialized in following changes
with new uprobe syscall.

The uprobe trampoline needs to be callable/reachable from the probed address,
so while searching for available address we use is_reachable_by_call function
to decide if the uprobe trampoline is callable from the probe address.

All uprobe_trampoline objects are stored in uprobes_state object and are
cleaned up when the process mm_struct goes down. Adding new arch hooks
for that, because this change is x86_64 specific.

Locking is provided by callers in following changes.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/uprobes.h   |   6 ++
 kernel/events/uprobes.c   |  10 +++
 kernel/fork.c             |   1 +
 4 files changed, 148 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index 77050e5a4680..023c55d52138 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -608,6 +608,137 @@ static void riprel_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
 		*sr = utask->autask.saved_scratch_register;
 	}
 }
+
+static int tramp_mremap(const struct vm_special_mapping *sm, struct vm_area_struct *new_vma)
+{
+	return -EPERM;
+}
+
+static struct page *tramp_mapping_pages[2] __ro_after_init;
+
+static struct vm_special_mapping tramp_mapping = {
+	.name   = "[uprobes-trampoline]",
+	.mremap = tramp_mremap,
+	.pages  = tramp_mapping_pages,
+};
+
+struct uprobe_trampoline {
+	struct hlist_node	node;
+	unsigned long		vaddr;
+	atomic64_t		ref;
+};
+
+static bool is_reachable_by_call(unsigned long vtramp, unsigned long vaddr)
+{
+	long delta = (long)(vaddr + 5 - vtramp);
+
+	return delta >= INT_MIN && delta <= INT_MAX;
+}
+
+static unsigned long find_nearest_page(unsigned long vaddr)
+{
+	struct vm_area_struct *vma, *prev = NULL;
+	unsigned long prev_vm_end = PAGE_SIZE;
+	VMA_ITERATOR(vmi, current->mm, 0);
+
+	vma = vma_next(&vmi);
+	while (vma) {
+		if (prev)
+			prev_vm_end = prev->vm_end;
+		if (vma->vm_start - prev_vm_end  >= PAGE_SIZE) {
+			if (is_reachable_by_call(prev_vm_end, vaddr))
+				return prev_vm_end;
+			if (is_reachable_by_call(vma->vm_start - PAGE_SIZE, vaddr))
+				return vma->vm_start - PAGE_SIZE;
+		}
+		prev = vma;
+		vma = vma_next(&vmi);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct uprobe_trampoline *create_uprobe_trampoline(unsigned long vaddr)
+{
+	struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(current);
+	struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
+	struct uprobe_trampoline *tramp;
+	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
+
+	if (!user_64bit_mode(regs))
+		return NULL;
+
+	vaddr = find_nearest_page(vaddr);
+	if (!vaddr)
+		return NULL;
+
+	tramp = kzalloc(sizeof(*tramp), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (unlikely(!tramp))
+		return NULL;
+
+	atomic64_set(&tramp->ref, 1);
+	tramp->vaddr = vaddr;
+
+	vma = _install_special_mapping(mm, tramp->vaddr, PAGE_SIZE,
+				VM_READ|VM_EXEC|VM_MAYEXEC|VM_MAYREAD|VM_DONTCOPY|VM_IO,
+				&tramp_mapping);
+	if (IS_ERR(vma))
+		goto free_area;
+	return tramp;
+
+free_area:
+	kfree(tramp);
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+__maybe_unused
+static struct uprobe_trampoline *uprobe_trampoline_get(unsigned long vaddr)
+{
+	struct uprobes_state *state = &current->mm->uprobes_state;
+	struct uprobe_trampoline *tramp = NULL;
+
+	hlist_for_each_entry(tramp, &state->head_tramps, node) {
+		if (is_reachable_by_call(tramp->vaddr, vaddr)) {
+			atomic64_inc(&tramp->ref);
+			return tramp;
+		}
+	}
+
+	tramp = create_uprobe_trampoline(vaddr);
+	if (!tramp)
+		return NULL;
+
+	hlist_add_head(&tramp->node, &state->head_tramps);
+	return tramp;
+}
+
+static void destroy_uprobe_trampoline(struct uprobe_trampoline *tramp)
+{
+	hlist_del(&tramp->node);
+	kfree(tramp);
+}
+
+__maybe_unused
+static void uprobe_trampoline_put(struct uprobe_trampoline *tramp)
+{
+	if (tramp && atomic64_dec_and_test(&tramp->ref))
+		destroy_uprobe_trampoline(tramp);
+}
+
+void arch_uprobe_init_state(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+	INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&mm->uprobes_state.head_tramps);
+}
+
+void arch_uprobe_clear_state(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+	struct uprobes_state *state = &mm->uprobes_state;
+	struct uprobe_trampoline *tramp;
+	struct hlist_node *n;
+
+	hlist_for_each_entry_safe(tramp, n, &state->head_tramps, node)
+		destroy_uprobe_trampoline(tramp);
+}
 #else /* 32-bit: */
 /*
  * No RIP-relative addressing on 32-bit
diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
index 6af61e977bfb..bc532d086813 100644
--- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 #include <linux/wait.h>
 #include <linux/timer.h>
 #include <linux/seqlock.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
 
 struct uprobe;
 struct vm_area_struct;
@@ -185,6 +186,9 @@ struct xol_area;
 
 struct uprobes_state {
 	struct xol_area		*xol_area;
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+	struct hlist_head	head_tramps;
+#endif
 };
 
 typedef int (*uprobe_write_verify_t)(struct page *page, unsigned long vaddr,
@@ -233,6 +237,8 @@ extern void uprobe_handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs);
 extern void *arch_uretprobe_trampoline(unsigned long *psize);
 extern unsigned long uprobe_get_trampoline_vaddr(void);
 extern void uprobe_copy_from_page(struct page *page, unsigned long vaddr, void *dst, int len);
+extern void arch_uprobe_clear_state(struct mm_struct *mm);
+extern void arch_uprobe_init_state(struct mm_struct *mm);
 #else /* !CONFIG_UPROBES */
 struct uprobes_state {
 };
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index d256c695d7ff..a3107f63f295 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1812,6 +1812,14 @@ static struct xol_area *get_xol_area(void)
 	return area;
 }
 
+void __weak arch_uprobe_clear_state(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+}
+
+void __weak arch_uprobe_init_state(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+}
+
 /*
  * uprobe_clear_state - Free the area allocated for slots.
  */
@@ -1823,6 +1831,8 @@ void uprobe_clear_state(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	delayed_uprobe_remove(NULL, mm);
 	mutex_unlock(&delayed_uprobe_lock);
 
+	arch_uprobe_clear_state(mm);
+
 	if (!area)
 		return;
 
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index c4b26cd8998b..4c2df3816728 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1269,6 +1269,7 @@ static void mm_init_uprobes_state(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_UPROBES
 	mm->uprobes_state.xol_area = NULL;
+	arch_uprobe_init_state(mm);
 #endif
 }
 
-- 
2.49.0
Re: [PATCH perf/core 08/22] uprobes/x86: Add mapping for optimized uprobe trampolines
Posted by Oleg Nesterov 7 months, 3 weeks ago
On 04/21, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> +struct uprobe_trampoline {
> +	struct hlist_node	node;
> +	unsigned long		vaddr;
> +	atomic64_t		ref;
> +};

I don't really understand the point of uprobe_trampoline->ref...

set_orig_insn/swbp_unoptimize paths don't call uprobe_trampoline_put().
It is only called in unlikely case when swbp_optimize() fails, so perhaps
we can kill this member and uprobe_trampoline_put() ? At least in the initial
version.

> +static void uprobe_trampoline_put(struct uprobe_trampoline *tramp)
> +{
> +	if (tramp && atomic64_dec_and_test(&tramp->ref))
> +		destroy_uprobe_trampoline(tramp);
> +}

Why does it check tramp != NULL ?

Oleg.
Re: [PATCH perf/core 08/22] uprobes/x86: Add mapping for optimized uprobe trampolines
Posted by Jiri Olsa 7 months, 3 weeks ago
On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 08:04:32PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 04/21, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > +struct uprobe_trampoline {
> > +	struct hlist_node	node;
> > +	unsigned long		vaddr;
> > +	atomic64_t		ref;
> > +};
> 
> I don't really understand the point of uprobe_trampoline->ref...
> 
> set_orig_insn/swbp_unoptimize paths don't call uprobe_trampoline_put().
> It is only called in unlikely case when swbp_optimize() fails, so perhaps
> we can kill this member and uprobe_trampoline_put() ? At least in the initial
> version.

right, we can remove that

> 
> > +static void uprobe_trampoline_put(struct uprobe_trampoline *tramp)
> > +{
> > +	if (tramp && atomic64_dec_and_test(&tramp->ref))
> > +		destroy_uprobe_trampoline(tramp);
> > +}
> 
> Why does it check tramp != NULL ?

I think some earlier version of the code could have called that with NULL,
will remove that

thanks,
jirka
Re: [PATCH perf/core 08/22] uprobes/x86: Add mapping for optimized uprobe trampolines
Posted by Oleg Nesterov 7 months, 3 weeks ago
On 04/21, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> +static unsigned long find_nearest_page(unsigned long vaddr)
> +{
> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma, *prev = NULL;
> +	unsigned long prev_vm_end = PAGE_SIZE;
> +	VMA_ITERATOR(vmi, current->mm, 0);
> +
> +	vma = vma_next(&vmi);
> +	while (vma) {
> +		if (prev)
> +			prev_vm_end = prev->vm_end;
> +		if (vma->vm_start - prev_vm_end  >= PAGE_SIZE) {
> +			if (is_reachable_by_call(prev_vm_end, vaddr))
> +				return prev_vm_end;
> +			if (is_reachable_by_call(vma->vm_start - PAGE_SIZE, vaddr))
> +				return vma->vm_start - PAGE_SIZE;
> +		}
> +		prev = vma;
> +		vma = vma_next(&vmi);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

This can be simplified afaics... We don't really need prev, and we can
use for_each_vma(),

	static unsigned long find_nearest_page(unsigned long vaddr)
	{
		struct vm_area_struct *vma;
		unsigned long prev_vm_end = PAGE_SIZE;
		VMA_ITERATOR(vmi, current->mm, 0);

		for_each_vma(vmi, vma) {
			if (vma->vm_start - prev_vm_end  >= PAGE_SIZE) {
				if (is_reachable_by_call(prev_vm_end, vaddr))
					return prev_vm_end;
				if (is_reachable_by_call(vma->vm_start - PAGE_SIZE, vaddr))
					return vma->vm_start - PAGE_SIZE;
			}
			prev_vm_end = vma->vm_end;
		}

		return 0;
	}

> +static struct uprobe_trampoline *create_uprobe_trampoline(unsigned long vaddr)
> +{
> +	struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(current);
> +	struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> +	struct uprobe_trampoline *tramp;
> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> +
> +	if (!user_64bit_mode(regs))
> +		return NULL;

Cosmetic, but I think it would be better to move this check into the
caller, uprobe_trampoline_get().

> +	vma = _install_special_mapping(mm, tramp->vaddr, PAGE_SIZE,
> +				VM_READ|VM_EXEC|VM_MAYEXEC|VM_MAYREAD|VM_DONTCOPY|VM_IO,
> +				&tramp_mapping);

Note that xol_add_vma() -> _install_special_mapping() uses VM_SEALED_SYSMAP.
Perhaps create_uprobe_trampoline() should use this flag too for consistency?

Oleg.
Re: [PATCH perf/core 08/22] uprobes/x86: Add mapping for optimized uprobe trampolines
Posted by Oleg Nesterov 7 months, 3 weeks ago
On 04/27, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 04/21, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > +static unsigned long find_nearest_page(unsigned long vaddr)
> > +{
> > +	struct vm_area_struct *vma, *prev = NULL;
> > +	unsigned long prev_vm_end = PAGE_SIZE;
> > +	VMA_ITERATOR(vmi, current->mm, 0);
> > +
> > +	vma = vma_next(&vmi);
> > +	while (vma) {
> > +		if (prev)
> > +			prev_vm_end = prev->vm_end;
> > +		if (vma->vm_start - prev_vm_end  >= PAGE_SIZE) {
> > +			if (is_reachable_by_call(prev_vm_end, vaddr))
> > +				return prev_vm_end;
> > +			if (is_reachable_by_call(vma->vm_start - PAGE_SIZE, vaddr))
> > +				return vma->vm_start - PAGE_SIZE;
> > +		}
> > +		prev = vma;
> > +		vma = vma_next(&vmi);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
>
> This can be simplified afaics... We don't really need prev, and we can
> use for_each_vma(),
>
> 	static unsigned long find_nearest_page(unsigned long vaddr)
> 	{
> 		struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> 		unsigned long prev_vm_end = PAGE_SIZE;
> 		VMA_ITERATOR(vmi, current->mm, 0);
>
> 		for_each_vma(vmi, vma) {
> 			if (vma->vm_start - prev_vm_end  >= PAGE_SIZE) {
> 				if (is_reachable_by_call(prev_vm_end, vaddr))
> 					return prev_vm_end;
> 				if (is_reachable_by_call(vma->vm_start - PAGE_SIZE, vaddr))
> 					return vma->vm_start - PAGE_SIZE;
> 			}
> 			prev_vm_end = vma->vm_end;
> 		}
>
> 		return 0;
> 	}

Either way it doesn't look nice. If nothing else, we should respect
vm_start/end_gap(vma).

Can't we do something like

	struct vm_unmapped_area_info info = {};

	info.length = PAGE_SIZE;
	info.low_limit  = vaddr - INT_MIN + 5;
	info.high_limit = vaddr + INT_MAX;
	
	info.flags = VM_UNMAPPED_AREA_TOPDOWN; // makes sense?

	return vm_unmapped_area(&info);

instead ?

Oleg.
Re: [PATCH perf/core 08/22] uprobes/x86: Add mapping for optimized uprobe trampolines
Posted by Jiri Olsa 7 months, 3 weeks ago
On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 07:34:56PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 04/27, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > On 04/21, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > >
> > > +static unsigned long find_nearest_page(unsigned long vaddr)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct vm_area_struct *vma, *prev = NULL;
> > > +	unsigned long prev_vm_end = PAGE_SIZE;
> > > +	VMA_ITERATOR(vmi, current->mm, 0);
> > > +
> > > +	vma = vma_next(&vmi);
> > > +	while (vma) {
> > > +		if (prev)
> > > +			prev_vm_end = prev->vm_end;
> > > +		if (vma->vm_start - prev_vm_end  >= PAGE_SIZE) {
> > > +			if (is_reachable_by_call(prev_vm_end, vaddr))
> > > +				return prev_vm_end;
> > > +			if (is_reachable_by_call(vma->vm_start - PAGE_SIZE, vaddr))
> > > +				return vma->vm_start - PAGE_SIZE;
> > > +		}
> > > +		prev = vma;
> > > +		vma = vma_next(&vmi);
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> >
> > This can be simplified afaics... We don't really need prev, and we can
> > use for_each_vma(),
> >
> > 	static unsigned long find_nearest_page(unsigned long vaddr)
> > 	{
> > 		struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> > 		unsigned long prev_vm_end = PAGE_SIZE;
> > 		VMA_ITERATOR(vmi, current->mm, 0);
> >
> > 		for_each_vma(vmi, vma) {
> > 			if (vma->vm_start - prev_vm_end  >= PAGE_SIZE) {
> > 				if (is_reachable_by_call(prev_vm_end, vaddr))
> > 					return prev_vm_end;
> > 				if (is_reachable_by_call(vma->vm_start - PAGE_SIZE, vaddr))
> > 					return vma->vm_start - PAGE_SIZE;
> > 			}
> > 			prev_vm_end = vma->vm_end;
> > 		}
> >
> > 		return 0;
> > 	}
> 
> Either way it doesn't look nice. If nothing else, we should respect
> vm_start/end_gap(vma).
> 
> Can't we do something like
> 
> 	struct vm_unmapped_area_info info = {};
> 
> 	info.length = PAGE_SIZE;
> 	info.low_limit  = vaddr - INT_MIN + 5;
> 	info.high_limit = vaddr + INT_MAX;
> 	
> 	info.flags = VM_UNMAPPED_AREA_TOPDOWN; // makes sense?

so this would return highest available space right? current code goes from
bottom now, not sure what's preffered

> 
> 	return vm_unmapped_area(&info);
> 
> instead ?

yes, I did not realize we could use this, looks better, will try that

thanks,
jirka
Re: [PATCH perf/core 08/22] uprobes/x86: Add mapping for optimized uprobe trampolines
Posted by Andrii Nakryiko 7 months, 3 weeks ago
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 2:46 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Adding support to add special mapping for for user space trampoline

for for

> with following functions:
>
>   uprobe_trampoline_get - find or add uprobe_trampoline
>   uprobe_trampoline_put - remove or destroy uprobe_trampoline
>
> The user space trampoline is exported as arch specific user space special
> mapping through tramp_mapping, which is initialized in following changes
> with new uprobe syscall.
>
> The uprobe trampoline needs to be callable/reachable from the probed address,
> so while searching for available address we use is_reachable_by_call function
> to decide if the uprobe trampoline is callable from the probe address.
>
> All uprobe_trampoline objects are stored in uprobes_state object and are
> cleaned up when the process mm_struct goes down. Adding new arch hooks
> for that, because this change is x86_64 specific.
>
> Locking is provided by callers in following changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/uprobes.h   |   6 ++
>  kernel/events/uprobes.c   |  10 +++
>  kernel/fork.c             |   1 +
>  4 files changed, 148 insertions(+)
>

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

[...]