[PATCH v5] rcutorture: Perform more frequent testing of ->gpwrap

Joel Fernandes posted 1 patch 7 months, 3 weeks ago
.../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  5 ++
kernel/rcu/rcu.h                              |  4 ++
kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c                       | 72 ++++++++++++++++++-
kernel/rcu/tree.c                             | 34 ++++++++-
kernel/rcu/tree.h                             |  1 +
5 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
[PATCH v5] rcutorture: Perform more frequent testing of ->gpwrap
Posted by Joel Fernandes 7 months, 3 weeks ago
Currently, the ->gpwrap is not tested (at all per my testing) due to the
requirement of a large delta between a CPU's rdp->gp_seq and its node's
rnp->gpseq.

This results in no testing of ->gpwrap being set. This patch by default
adds 5 minutes of testing with ->gpwrap forced by lowering the delta
between rdp->gp_seq and rnp->gp_seq to just 8 GPs. All of this is
configurable, including the active time for the setting and a full
testing cycle.

By default, the first 25 minutes of a test will have the _default_
behavior there is right now (ULONG_MAX / 4) delta. Then for 5 minutes,
we switch to a smaller delta causing 1-2 wraps in 5 minutes. I believe
this is reasonable since we at least add a little bit of testing for
usecases where ->gpwrap is set.

Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
---
v4->v5
 - Added gpwrap_lag torture param to turn off entire test.
 - replaced references to 'ovf' with 'gpwrap lag'.

Will move this to my rcu/torture-for-6.16 and update my rcu/for-next branches.
 
 .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  5 ++
 kernel/rcu/rcu.h                              |  4 ++
 kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c                       | 72 ++++++++++++++++++-
 kernel/rcu/tree.c                             | 34 ++++++++-
 kernel/rcu/tree.h                             |  1 +
 5 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index 76e538c77e31..e1d11b6595fd 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -5657,6 +5657,11 @@
 			are zero, rcutorture acts as if is interpreted
 			they are all non-zero.
 
+	rcutorture.gpwrap_lag= [KNL]
+			Enable grace-period wrap lag testing. Setting
+			to false prevents the gpwrap lag test from
+			running.
+
 	rcutorture.irqreader= [KNL]
 			Run RCU readers from irq handlers, or, more
 			accurately, from a timer handler.  Not all RCU
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
index eed2951a4962..516b26024a37 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
@@ -572,6 +572,8 @@ void do_trace_rcu_torture_read(const char *rcutorturename,
 			       unsigned long c_old,
 			       unsigned long c);
 void rcu_gp_set_torture_wait(int duration);
+void rcu_set_gpwrap_lag(unsigned long lag);
+int rcu_get_gpwrap_count(int cpu);
 #else
 static inline void rcutorture_get_gp_data(int *flags, unsigned long *gp_seq)
 {
@@ -589,6 +591,8 @@ void do_trace_rcu_torture_read(const char *rcutorturename,
 	do { } while (0)
 #endif
 static inline void rcu_gp_set_torture_wait(int duration) { }
+static inline void rcu_set_gpwrap_lag(unsigned long lag) { }
+static inline int rcu_get_gpwrap_count(int cpu) { return 0; }
 #endif
 unsigned long long rcutorture_gather_gp_seqs(void);
 void rcutorture_format_gp_seqs(unsigned long long seqs, char *cp, size_t len);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
index 402b9979e95a..92e2686a4795 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
@@ -118,6 +118,10 @@ torture_param(int, nreaders, -1, "Number of RCU reader threads");
 torture_param(int, object_debug, 0, "Enable debug-object double call_rcu() testing");
 torture_param(int, onoff_holdoff, 0, "Time after boot before CPU hotplugs (s)");
 torture_param(int, onoff_interval, 0, "Time between CPU hotplugs (jiffies), 0=disable");
+torture_param(bool, gpwrap_lag, true, "Enable grace-period wrap lag testing");
+torture_param(int, gpwrap_lag_gps, 8, "Value to set for set_gpwrap_lag during an active testing period.");
+torture_param(int, gpwrap_lag_cycle_mins, 30, "Total cycle duration for gpwrap lag testing (in minutes)");
+torture_param(int, gpwrap_lag_active_mins, 5, "Duration for which gpwrap lag is active within each cycle (in minutes)");
 torture_param(int, nocbs_nthreads, 0, "Number of NOCB toggle threads, 0 to disable");
 torture_param(int, nocbs_toggle, 1000, "Time between toggling nocb state (ms)");
 torture_param(int, preempt_duration, 0, "Preemption duration (ms), zero to disable");
@@ -419,6 +423,8 @@ struct rcu_torture_ops {
 	bool (*reader_blocked)(void);
 	unsigned long long (*gather_gp_seqs)(void);
 	void (*format_gp_seqs)(unsigned long long seqs, char *cp, size_t len);
+	void (*set_gpwrap_lag)(unsigned long lag);
+	int (*get_gpwrap_count)(int cpu);
 	long cbflood_max;
 	int irq_capable;
 	int can_boost;
@@ -626,6 +632,8 @@ static struct rcu_torture_ops rcu_ops = {
 				  : NULL,
 	.gather_gp_seqs		= rcutorture_gather_gp_seqs,
 	.format_gp_seqs		= rcutorture_format_gp_seqs,
+	.set_gpwrap_lag		= rcu_set_gpwrap_lag,
+	.get_gpwrap_count	= rcu_get_gpwrap_count,
 	.irq_capable		= 1,
 	.can_boost		= IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_BOOST),
 	.extendables		= RCUTORTURE_MAX_EXTEND,
@@ -2631,6 +2639,7 @@ rcu_torture_stats_print(void)
 	int i;
 	long pipesummary[RCU_TORTURE_PIPE_LEN + 1] = { 0 };
 	long batchsummary[RCU_TORTURE_PIPE_LEN + 1] = { 0 };
+	long n_gpwraps = 0;
 	struct rcu_torture *rtcp;
 	static unsigned long rtcv_snap = ULONG_MAX;
 	static bool splatted;
@@ -2641,6 +2650,8 @@ rcu_torture_stats_print(void)
 			pipesummary[i] += READ_ONCE(per_cpu(rcu_torture_count, cpu)[i]);
 			batchsummary[i] += READ_ONCE(per_cpu(rcu_torture_batch, cpu)[i]);
 		}
+		if (cur_ops->get_gpwrap_count)
+			n_gpwraps += cur_ops->get_gpwrap_count(cpu);
 	}
 	for (i = RCU_TORTURE_PIPE_LEN; i >= 0; i--) {
 		if (pipesummary[i] != 0)
@@ -2672,8 +2683,9 @@ rcu_torture_stats_print(void)
 		data_race(n_barrier_attempts),
 		data_race(n_rcu_torture_barrier_error));
 	pr_cont("read-exits: %ld ", data_race(n_read_exits)); // Statistic.
-	pr_cont("nocb-toggles: %ld:%ld\n",
+	pr_cont("nocb-toggles: %ld:%ld ",
 		atomic_long_read(&n_nocb_offload), atomic_long_read(&n_nocb_deoffload));
+	pr_cont("gpwraps: %ld\n", n_gpwraps);
 
 	pr_alert("%s%s ", torture_type, TORTURE_FLAG);
 	if (atomic_read(&n_rcu_torture_mberror) ||
@@ -3844,6 +3856,57 @@ static int rcu_torture_preempt(void *unused)
 
 static enum cpuhp_state rcutor_hp;
 
+static struct hrtimer gpwrap_lag_timer;
+static bool gpwrap_lag_active;
+
+/* Timer handler for toggling RCU grace-period sequence overflow test lag value */
+static enum hrtimer_restart rcu_gpwrap_lag_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
+{
+	ktime_t next_delay;
+
+	if (gpwrap_lag_active) {
+		pr_alert("rcu-torture: Disabling gpwrap lag (value=0)\n");
+		cur_ops->set_gpwrap_lag(0);
+		gpwrap_lag_active = false;
+		next_delay = ktime_set((gpwrap_lag_cycle_mins - gpwrap_lag_active_mins) * 60, 0);
+	} else {
+		pr_alert("rcu-torture: Enabling gpwrap lag (value=%d)\n", gpwrap_lag_gps);
+		cur_ops->set_gpwrap_lag(gpwrap_lag_gps);
+		gpwrap_lag_active = true;
+		next_delay = ktime_set(gpwrap_lag_active_mins * 60, 0);
+	}
+
+	if (torture_must_stop_irq())
+		return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
+
+	hrtimer_forward_now(timer, next_delay);
+	return HRTIMER_RESTART;
+}
+
+static int rcu_gpwrap_lag_init(void)
+{
+	if (!gpwrap_lag)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (gpwrap_lag_cycle_mins <= 0 || gpwrap_lag_active_mins <= 0) {
+		pr_alert("rcu-torture: lag timing parameters must be positive\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	hrtimer_setup(&gpwrap_lag_timer, rcu_gpwrap_lag_timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
+	gpwrap_lag_active = false;
+	hrtimer_start(&gpwrap_lag_timer,
+		      ktime_set((gpwrap_lag_cycle_mins - gpwrap_lag_active_mins) * 60, 0), HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void rcu_gpwrap_lag_cleanup(void)
+{
+	hrtimer_cancel(&gpwrap_lag_timer);
+	cur_ops->set_gpwrap_lag(0);
+	gpwrap_lag_active = false;
+}
 static void
 rcu_torture_cleanup(void)
 {
@@ -4017,6 +4080,9 @@ rcu_torture_cleanup(void)
 	torture_cleanup_end();
 	if (cur_ops->gp_slow_unregister)
 		cur_ops->gp_slow_unregister(NULL);
+
+	if (gpwrap_lag && cur_ops->set_gpwrap_lag)
+		rcu_gpwrap_lag_cleanup();
 }
 
 static void rcu_torture_leak_cb(struct rcu_head *rhp)
@@ -4519,6 +4585,10 @@ rcu_torture_init(void)
 	torture_init_end();
 	if (cur_ops->gp_slow_register && !WARN_ON_ONCE(!cur_ops->gp_slow_unregister))
 		cur_ops->gp_slow_register(&rcu_fwd_cb_nodelay);
+
+	if (gpwrap_lag && cur_ops->set_gpwrap_lag && rcu_gpwrap_lag_init())
+		goto unwind;
+
 	return 0;
 
 unwind:
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 659f83e71048..6ec30d07759d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -80,6 +80,15 @@ static void rcu_sr_normal_gp_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rcu_data, rcu_data) = {
 	.gpwrap = true,
 };
+
+int rcu_get_gpwrap_count(int cpu)
+{
+	struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
+
+	return READ_ONCE(rdp->gpwrap_count);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_get_gpwrap_count);
+
 static struct rcu_state rcu_state = {
 	.level = { &rcu_state.node[0] },
 	.gp_state = RCU_GP_IDLE,
@@ -757,6 +766,25 @@ void rcu_request_urgent_qs_task(struct task_struct *t)
 	smp_store_release(per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data.rcu_urgent_qs, cpu), true);
 }
 
+/**
+ * rcu_set_gpwrap_lag - Set RCU GP sequence overflow lag value.
+ * @lag_gps: Set overflow lag to this many grace period worth of counters
+ * which is used by rcutorture to quickly force a gpwrap situation.
+ * @lag_gps = 0 means we reset it back to the boot-time value.
+ */
+static unsigned long seq_gpwrap_lag = ULONG_MAX / 4;
+
+void rcu_set_gpwrap_lag(unsigned long lag_gps)
+{
+	unsigned long lag_seq_count;
+
+	lag_seq_count = (lag_gps == 0)
+			? ULONG_MAX / 4
+			: lag_gps << RCU_SEQ_CTR_SHIFT;
+	WRITE_ONCE(seq_gpwrap_lag, lag_seq_count);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_set_gpwrap_lag);
+
 /*
  * When trying to report a quiescent state on behalf of some other CPU,
  * it is our responsibility to check for and handle potential overflow
@@ -767,9 +795,11 @@ void rcu_request_urgent_qs_task(struct task_struct *t)
 static void rcu_gpnum_ovf(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 {
 	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
-	if (ULONG_CMP_LT(rcu_seq_current(&rdp->gp_seq) + ULONG_MAX / 4,
-			 rnp->gp_seq))
+	if (ULONG_CMP_LT(rcu_seq_current(&rdp->gp_seq) + seq_gpwrap_lag,
+			 rnp->gp_seq)) {
 		WRITE_ONCE(rdp->gpwrap, true);
+		WRITE_ONCE(rdp->gpwrap_count, READ_ONCE(rdp->gpwrap_count) + 1);
+	}
 	if (ULONG_CMP_LT(rdp->rcu_iw_gp_seq + ULONG_MAX / 4, rnp->gp_seq))
 		rdp->rcu_iw_gp_seq = rnp->gp_seq + ULONG_MAX / 4;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index a9a811d9d7a3..63bea388c243 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ struct rcu_data {
 	bool		core_needs_qs;	/* Core waits for quiescent state. */
 	bool		beenonline;	/* CPU online at least once. */
 	bool		gpwrap;		/* Possible ->gp_seq wrap. */
+	unsigned int	gpwrap_count;	/* Count of GP sequence wrap. */
 	bool		cpu_started;	/* RCU watching this onlining CPU. */
 	struct rcu_node *mynode;	/* This CPU's leaf of hierarchy */
 	unsigned long grpmask;		/* Mask to apply to leaf qsmask. */
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH v5] rcutorture: Perform more frequent testing of ->gpwrap
Posted by Joel Fernandes 7 months, 3 weeks ago

On 4/21/2025 1:47 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Currently, the ->gpwrap is not tested (at all per my testing) due to the
> requirement of a large delta between a CPU's rdp->gp_seq and its node's
> rnp->gpseq.
> 
> This results in no testing of ->gpwrap being set. This patch by default
> adds 5 minutes of testing with ->gpwrap forced by lowering the delta
> between rdp->gp_seq and rnp->gp_seq to just 8 GPs. All of this is
> configurable, including the active time for the setting and a full
> testing cycle.
> 
> By default, the first 25 minutes of a test will have the _default_
> behavior there is right now (ULONG_MAX / 4) delta. Then for 5 minutes,
> we switch to a smaller delta causing 1-2 wraps in 5 minutes. I believe
> this is reasonable since we at least add a little bit of testing for
> usecases where ->gpwrap is set.
> 
> Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
> ---
> v4->v5
>  - Added gpwrap_lag torture param to turn off entire test.
>  - replaced references to 'ovf' with 'gpwrap lag'.
> 
> Will move this to my rcu/torture-for-6.16 and update my rcu/for-next branches.
>  
>  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  5 ++
>  kernel/rcu/rcu.h                              |  4 ++
>  kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c                       | 72 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c                             | 34 ++++++++-
>  kernel/rcu/tree.h                             |  1 +
>  5 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 76e538c77e31..e1d11b6595fd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -5657,6 +5657,11 @@
>  			are zero, rcutorture acts as if is interpreted
>  			they are all non-zero.
>  
> +	rcutorture.gpwrap_lag= [KNL]
> +			Enable grace-period wrap lag testing. Setting
> +			to false prevents the gpwrap lag test from
> +			running.
> +
FYI, I added docs for the additional params here as well:


+       rcutorture.gpwrap_lag= [KNL]
+                       Enable grace-period wrap lag testing. Setting
+                       to false prevents the gpwrap lag test from
+                       running.
+
+       rcutorture.gpwrap_lag_gps= [KNL]
+                       Set the value for grace-period wrap lag during
+                       active lag testing periods. This controls how many
+                       grace periods differences we tolerate between
+                       rdp and rnp's gp_seq before setting overflow flag.
+
+       rcutorture.gpwrap_lag_cycle_mins= [KNL]
+                       Set the total cycle duration for gpwrap lag
+                       testing in minutes. This is the total time for
+                       one complete cycle of active and inactive
+                       testing periods. Default is 30 minutes.
+
+       rcutorture.gpwrap_lag_active_mins= [KNL]
+                       Set the duration for which gpwrap lag is active
+                       within each cycle, in minutes. During this time,
+                       the grace-period wrap lag will be set to the
+                       value specified by gpwrap_lag_gps. Default is
+                       5 minutes.
+


Will push this to my rcu/torture-for-6.16 and also update my rcu/for-next branch.

 - Joel
Re: [PATCH v5] rcutorture: Perform more frequent testing of ->gpwrap
Posted by Paul E. McKenney 7 months, 3 weeks ago
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 01:53:17PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On 4/21/2025 1:47 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > Currently, the ->gpwrap is not tested (at all per my testing) due to the
> > requirement of a large delta between a CPU's rdp->gp_seq and its node's
> > rnp->gpseq.
> > 
> > This results in no testing of ->gpwrap being set. This patch by default
> > adds 5 minutes of testing with ->gpwrap forced by lowering the delta
> > between rdp->gp_seq and rnp->gp_seq to just 8 GPs. All of this is
> > configurable, including the active time for the setting and a full
> > testing cycle.
> > 
> > By default, the first 25 minutes of a test will have the _default_
> > behavior there is right now (ULONG_MAX / 4) delta. Then for 5 minutes,
> > we switch to a smaller delta causing 1-2 wraps in 5 minutes. I believe
> > this is reasonable since we at least add a little bit of testing for
> > usecases where ->gpwrap is set.
> > 
> > Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > v4->v5
> >  - Added gpwrap_lag torture param to turn off entire test.
> >  - replaced references to 'ovf' with 'gpwrap lag'.
> > 
> > Will move this to my rcu/torture-for-6.16 and update my rcu/for-next branches.
> >  
> >  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  5 ++
> >  kernel/rcu/rcu.h                              |  4 ++
> >  kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c                       | 72 ++++++++++++++++++-
> >  kernel/rcu/tree.c                             | 34 ++++++++-
> >  kernel/rcu/tree.h                             |  1 +
> >  5 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > index 76e538c77e31..e1d11b6595fd 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > @@ -5657,6 +5657,11 @@
> >  			are zero, rcutorture acts as if is interpreted
> >  			they are all non-zero.
> >  
> > +	rcutorture.gpwrap_lag= [KNL]
> > +			Enable grace-period wrap lag testing. Setting
> > +			to false prevents the gpwrap lag test from
> > +			running.
> > +
> FYI, I added docs for the additional params here as well:

Even better, thank you!

> +       rcutorture.gpwrap_lag= [KNL]
> +                       Enable grace-period wrap lag testing. Setting
> +                       to false prevents the gpwrap lag test from
> +                       running.
> +
> +       rcutorture.gpwrap_lag_gps= [KNL]
> +                       Set the value for grace-period wrap lag during
> +                       active lag testing periods. This controls how many
> +                       grace periods differences we tolerate between
> +                       rdp and rnp's gp_seq before setting overflow flag.

I suggest adding the default, as well as the default when no testing
is taking place.

							Thanx, Paul

> +       rcutorture.gpwrap_lag_cycle_mins= [KNL]
> +                       Set the total cycle duration for gpwrap lag
> +                       testing in minutes. This is the total time for
> +                       one complete cycle of active and inactive
> +                       testing periods. Default is 30 minutes.
> +
> +       rcutorture.gpwrap_lag_active_mins= [KNL]
> +                       Set the duration for which gpwrap lag is active
> +                       within each cycle, in minutes. During this time,
> +                       the grace-period wrap lag will be set to the
> +                       value specified by gpwrap_lag_gps. Default is
> +                       5 minutes.
> +
> 
> 
> Will push this to my rcu/torture-for-6.16 and also update my rcu/for-next branch.
> 
>  - Joel
> 
>
Re: [PATCH v5] rcutorture: Perform more frequent testing of ->gpwrap
Posted by Joel Fernandes 7 months, 3 weeks ago

On 4/21/2025 2:32 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 01:53:17PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> On 4/21/2025 1:47 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>> Currently, the ->gpwrap is not tested (at all per my testing) due to the
>>> requirement of a large delta between a CPU's rdp->gp_seq and its node's
>>> rnp->gpseq.
>>>
>>> This results in no testing of ->gpwrap being set. This patch by default
>>> adds 5 minutes of testing with ->gpwrap forced by lowering the delta
>>> between rdp->gp_seq and rnp->gp_seq to just 8 GPs. All of this is
>>> configurable, including the active time for the setting and a full
>>> testing cycle.
>>>
>>> By default, the first 25 minutes of a test will have the _default_
>>> behavior there is right now (ULONG_MAX / 4) delta. Then for 5 minutes,
>>> we switch to a smaller delta causing 1-2 wraps in 5 minutes. I believe
>>> this is reasonable since we at least add a little bit of testing for
>>> usecases where ->gpwrap is set.
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
>>> ---
>>> v4->v5
>>>  - Added gpwrap_lag torture param to turn off entire test.
>>>  - replaced references to 'ovf' with 'gpwrap lag'.
>>>
>>> Will move this to my rcu/torture-for-6.16 and update my rcu/for-next branches.
>>>  
>>>  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  5 ++
>>>  kernel/rcu/rcu.h                              |  4 ++
>>>  kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c                       | 72 ++++++++++++++++++-
>>>  kernel/rcu/tree.c                             | 34 ++++++++-
>>>  kernel/rcu/tree.h                             |  1 +
>>>  5 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>> index 76e538c77e31..e1d11b6595fd 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>> @@ -5657,6 +5657,11 @@
>>>  			are zero, rcutorture acts as if is interpreted
>>>  			they are all non-zero.
>>>  
>>> +	rcutorture.gpwrap_lag= [KNL]
>>> +			Enable grace-period wrap lag testing. Setting
>>> +			to false prevents the gpwrap lag test from
>>> +			running.
>>> +
>> FYI, I added docs for the additional params here as well:
> 
> Even better, thank you!
> 
>> +       rcutorture.gpwrap_lag= [KNL]
>> +                       Enable grace-period wrap lag testing. Setting
>> +                       to false prevents the gpwrap lag test from
>> +                       running.
>> +
>> +       rcutorture.gpwrap_lag_gps= [KNL]
>> +                       Set the value for grace-period wrap lag during
>> +                       active lag testing periods. This controls how many
>> +                       grace periods differences we tolerate between
>> +                       rdp and rnp's gp_seq before setting overflow flag.
> 
> I suggest adding the default, as well as the default when no testing
> is taking place.
Will do, thanks.

 - Joel