arch/alpha/kernel/smp.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
strcpy() is deprecated; use strscpy() instead.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/88
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
---
arch/alpha/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/smp.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/smp.c
index ed06367ece57..56155b988b9c 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/smp.c
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ recv_secondary_console_msg(void)
cnt = cpu->ipc_buffer[0] >> 32;
if (cnt <= 0 || cnt >= 80)
- strcpy(buf, "<<< BOGUS MSG >>>");
+ strscpy(buf, "<<< BOGUS MSG >>>");
else {
cp1 = (char *) &cpu->ipc_buffer[1];
cp2 = buf;
--
2.49.0
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 09:20:52PM +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> strcpy() is deprecated; use strscpy() instead.
Are there more strcpy() uses in arch/alpha? Maybe do all of them and
give the Subject prefix as "alpha:". If not, the "smp:" prefix is likely
to non-specific. Maybe "alpha: smp:".
-Kees
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/88
> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
> ---
> arch/alpha/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/smp.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/smp.c
> index ed06367ece57..56155b988b9c 100644
> --- a/arch/alpha/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ recv_secondary_console_msg(void)
>
> cnt = cpu->ipc_buffer[0] >> 32;
> if (cnt <= 0 || cnt >= 80)
> - strcpy(buf, "<<< BOGUS MSG >>>");
> + strscpy(buf, "<<< BOGUS MSG >>>");
> else {
> cp1 = (char *) &cpu->ipc_buffer[1];
> cp2 = buf;
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
--
Kees Cook
On 18. Apr 2025, at 22:23, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 09:20:52PM +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote: >> strcpy() is deprecated; use strscpy() instead. > > Are there more strcpy() uses in arch/alpha? Maybe do all of them and > give the Subject prefix as "alpha:". If not, the "smp:" prefix is likely > to non-specific. Maybe "alpha: smp:". There are a handful left, but they're not as straightforward as this one - so I'd prefer to keep them separate. Could the committer change the subject to "alpha: smp:" or should I submit a v2 just for the title? Thanks, Thorsten
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 5:11 PM Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev> wrote: > > On 18. Apr 2025, at 22:23, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 09:20:52PM +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote: > >> strcpy() is deprecated; use strscpy() instead. > > > > Are there more strcpy() uses in arch/alpha? Maybe do all of them and > > give the Subject prefix as "alpha:". If not, the "smp:" prefix is likely > > to non-specific. Maybe "alpha: smp:". > > There are a handful left, but they're not as straightforward as this > one - so I'd prefer to keep them separate. > > Could the committer change the subject to "alpha: smp:" or should I > submit a v2 just for the title? I'll fix it up when I add it to my tree. Thanks! Matt
Hi Matt, On 19. Apr 2025, at 01:01, Matt Turner wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 5:11 PM Thorsten Blum wrote: >> >> On 18. Apr 2025, at 22:23, Kees Cook wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 09:20:52PM +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote: >>>> strcpy() is deprecated; use strscpy() instead. >>> >>> Are there more strcpy() uses in arch/alpha? Maybe do all of them and >>> give the Subject prefix as "alpha:". If not, the "smp:" prefix is likely >>> to non-specific. Maybe "alpha: smp:". >> >> There are a handful left, but they're not as straightforward as this >> one - so I'd prefer to keep them separate. >> >> Could the committer change the subject to "alpha: smp:" or should I >> submit a v2 just for the title? > > I'll fix it up when I add it to my tree. This one didn't make it into the last merge window, did it? Should I resend it or can you take care of it? Thanks, Thorsten
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.