mm/gup.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
The backport of upstream commit c8070b787519 ("mm: Don't pin ZERO_PAGE
in pin_user_pages()") into v6.1.130 noted below in Fixes does not
account for commit 0f0892356fa1 ("mm: allow multiple error returns in
try_grab_page()"), which changed the return value of try_grab_page()
from bool to int. Therefore returning 0, success in the upstream
version, becomes an error here. Fix the return value.
Fixes: 476c1dfefab8 ("mm: Don't pin ZERO_PAGE in pin_user_pages()")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Z_6uhLQjJ7SSzI13@eldamar.lan
Reported-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Reported-by: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
---
mm/gup.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index b1daaa9d89aa..76a2b0943e2d 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ bool __must_check try_grab_page(struct page *page, unsigned int flags)
* and it is used in a *lot* of places.
*/
if (is_zero_page(page))
- return 0;
+ return true;
/*
* Similar to try_grab_folio(): be sure to *also*
--
2.48.1
On 16.04.25 22:24, Alex Williamson wrote:
> The backport of upstream commit c8070b787519 ("mm: Don't pin ZERO_PAGE
> in pin_user_pages()") into v6.1.130 noted below in Fixes does not
> account for commit 0f0892356fa1 ("mm: allow multiple error returns in
> try_grab_page()"), which changed the return value of try_grab_page()
> from bool to int. Therefore returning 0, success in the upstream
> version, becomes an error here. Fix the return value.
>
> Fixes: 476c1dfefab8 ("mm: Don't pin ZERO_PAGE in pin_user_pages()")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Z_6uhLQjJ7SSzI13@eldamar.lan
> Reported-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
> Reported-by: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> ---
> mm/gup.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index b1daaa9d89aa..76a2b0943e2d 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ bool __must_check try_grab_page(struct page *page, unsigned int flags)
> * and it is used in a *lot* of places.
> */
> if (is_zero_page(page))
> - return 0;
> + return true;
>
> /*
> * Similar to try_grab_folio(): be sure to *also*
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Hi Alex,
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 02:24:39PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> The backport of upstream commit c8070b787519 ("mm: Don't pin ZERO_PAGE
> in pin_user_pages()") into v6.1.130 noted below in Fixes does not
> account for commit 0f0892356fa1 ("mm: allow multiple error returns in
> try_grab_page()"), which changed the return value of try_grab_page()
> from bool to int. Therefore returning 0, success in the upstream
> version, becomes an error here. Fix the return value.
>
> Fixes: 476c1dfefab8 ("mm: Don't pin ZERO_PAGE in pin_user_pages()")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Z_6uhLQjJ7SSzI13@eldamar.lan
> Reported-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
> Reported-by: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> ---
> mm/gup.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index b1daaa9d89aa..76a2b0943e2d 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ bool __must_check try_grab_page(struct page *page, unsigned int flags)
> * and it is used in a *lot* of places.
> */
> if (is_zero_page(page))
> - return 0;
> + return true;
>
> /*
> * Similar to try_grab_folio(): be sure to *also*
> --
> 2.48.1
Thank you, with your patch applied one test VM with a PCI passhtrough
configuration start again.
Tested-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Regards,
Salvatore
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 11:49:24PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 02:24:39PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > The backport of upstream commit c8070b787519 ("mm: Don't pin ZERO_PAGE
> > in pin_user_pages()") into v6.1.130 noted below in Fixes does not
> > account for commit 0f0892356fa1 ("mm: allow multiple error returns in
> > try_grab_page()"), which changed the return value of try_grab_page()
> > from bool to int. Therefore returning 0, success in the upstream
> > version, becomes an error here. Fix the return value.
> >
> > Fixes: 476c1dfefab8 ("mm: Don't pin ZERO_PAGE in pin_user_pages()")
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Z_6uhLQjJ7SSzI13@eldamar.lan
> > Reported-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
> > Reported-by: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> > Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > mm/gup.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> > index b1daaa9d89aa..76a2b0943e2d 100644
> > --- a/mm/gup.c
> > +++ b/mm/gup.c
> > @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ bool __must_check try_grab_page(struct page *page, unsigned int flags)
> > * and it is used in a *lot* of places.
> > */
> > if (is_zero_page(page))
> > - return 0;
> > + return true;
> >
> > /*
> > * Similar to try_grab_folio(): be sure to *also*
> > --
> > 2.48.1
>
> Thank you, with your patch applied one test VM with a PCI passhtrough
> configuration start again.
>
> Tested-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Now queued up, thanks.
greg k-h
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.