Register DPLL sub-devices to expose this functionality provided
by ZL3073x chip family. Each sub-device represents one of the provided
DPLL channels.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
---
drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c b/drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c
index 0bd31591245a2..fda77724a8452 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/math64.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
#include <linux/mfd/zl3073x.h>
#include <linux/mfd/zl3073x_regs.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
@@ -774,6 +775,20 @@ int zl3073x_dev_probe(struct zl3073x_dev *zldev,
if (rc)
return rc;
+ /* Add DPLL sub-device cell for each DPLL channel */
+ for (i = 0; i < chip_info->num_channels; i++) {
+ struct mfd_cell dpll_dev = MFD_CELL_BASIC("zl3073x-dpll", NULL,
+ NULL, 0, i);
+
+ rc = devm_mfd_add_devices(zldev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
+ &dpll_dev, 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
+ if (rc) {
+ dev_err_probe(zldev->dev, rc,
+ "Failed to add DPLL sub-device\n");
+ return rc;
+ }
+ }
+
/* Register the device as devlink device */
devlink = priv_to_devlink(zldev);
devlink_register(devlink);
--
2.48.1
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> Register DPLL sub-devices to expose this functionality provided
> by ZL3073x chip family. Each sub-device represents one of the provided
> DPLL channels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c b/drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c
> index 0bd31591245a2..fda77724a8452 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> #include <linux/math64.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
> #include <linux/mfd/zl3073x.h>
> #include <linux/mfd/zl3073x_regs.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> @@ -774,6 +775,20 @@ int zl3073x_dev_probe(struct zl3073x_dev *zldev,
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
> + /* Add DPLL sub-device cell for each DPLL channel */
> + for (i = 0; i < chip_info->num_channels; i++) {
> + struct mfd_cell dpll_dev = MFD_CELL_BASIC("zl3073x-dpll", NULL,
> + NULL, 0, i);
Create a static one of these with the maximum amount of channels.
> +
> + rc = devm_mfd_add_devices(zldev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> + &dpll_dev, 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
Then pass chip_info->num_channels as the 4th argument.
> + if (rc) {
> + dev_err_probe(zldev->dev, rc,
> + "Failed to add DPLL sub-device\n");
> + return rc;
> + }
> + }
> +
> /* Register the device as devlink device */
> devlink = priv_to_devlink(zldev);
> devlink_register(devlink);
> --
> 2.48.1
>
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
On 17. 04. 25 6:20 odp., Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2025, Ivan Vecera wrote:
>
>> Register DPLL sub-devices to expose this functionality provided
>> by ZL3073x chip family. Each sub-device represents one of the provided
>> DPLL channels.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c b/drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c
>> index 0bd31591245a2..fda77724a8452 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c
>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>> #include <linux/device.h>
>> #include <linux/export.h>
>> #include <linux/math64.h>
>> +#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
>> #include <linux/mfd/zl3073x.h>
>> #include <linux/mfd/zl3073x_regs.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> @@ -774,6 +775,20 @@ int zl3073x_dev_probe(struct zl3073x_dev *zldev,
>> if (rc)
>> return rc;
>>
>> + /* Add DPLL sub-device cell for each DPLL channel */
>> + for (i = 0; i < chip_info->num_channels; i++) {
>> + struct mfd_cell dpll_dev = MFD_CELL_BASIC("zl3073x-dpll", NULL,
>> + NULL, 0, i);
>
> Create a static one of these with the maximum amount of channels.
Like this?
static const struct mfd_cell dpll_cells[] = {
MFD_CELL_BASIC("zl3073x-dpll", NULL, NULL, 0, 1),
MFD_CELL_BASIC("zl3073x-dpll", NULL, NULL, 0, 2),
MFD_CELL_BASIC("zl3073x-dpll", NULL, NULL, 0, 3),
MFD_CELL_BASIC("zl3073x-dpll", NULL, NULL, 0, 4),
MFD_CELL_BASIC("zl3073x-dpll", NULL, NULL, 0, 5),
};
rc = devm_mfd_add_devices(zldev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, dpll_cells,
chip_info->num_channels, NULL, 0, NULL);
Ivan
>
>> +
>> + rc = devm_mfd_add_devices(zldev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
>> + &dpll_dev, 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
>
> Then pass chip_info->num_channels as the 4th argument.
>
>> + if (rc) {
>> + dev_err_probe(zldev->dev, rc,
>> + "Failed to add DPLL sub-device\n");
>> + return rc;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> /* Register the device as devlink device */
>> devlink = priv_to_devlink(zldev);
>> devlink_register(devlink);
>> --
>> 2.48.1
>>
>
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Ivan Vecera wrote:
>
>
> On 17. 04. 25 6:20 odp., Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Apr 2025, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> >
> > > Register DPLL sub-devices to expose this functionality provided
> > > by ZL3073x chip family. Each sub-device represents one of the provided
> > > DPLL channels.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c b/drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c
> > > index 0bd31591245a2..fda77724a8452 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c
> > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/device.h>
> > > #include <linux/export.h>
> > > #include <linux/math64.h>
> > > +#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
> > > #include <linux/mfd/zl3073x.h>
> > > #include <linux/mfd/zl3073x_regs.h>
> > > #include <linux/module.h>
> > > @@ -774,6 +775,20 @@ int zl3073x_dev_probe(struct zl3073x_dev *zldev,
> > > if (rc)
> > > return rc;
> > > + /* Add DPLL sub-device cell for each DPLL channel */
> > > + for (i = 0; i < chip_info->num_channels; i++) {
> > > + struct mfd_cell dpll_dev = MFD_CELL_BASIC("zl3073x-dpll", NULL,
> > > + NULL, 0, i);
> >
> > Create a static one of these with the maximum amount of channels.
>
> Like this?
>
> static const struct mfd_cell dpll_cells[] = {
> MFD_CELL_BASIC("zl3073x-dpll", NULL, NULL, 0, 1),
> MFD_CELL_BASIC("zl3073x-dpll", NULL, NULL, 0, 2),
> MFD_CELL_BASIC("zl3073x-dpll", NULL, NULL, 0, 3),
> MFD_CELL_BASIC("zl3073x-dpll", NULL, NULL, 0, 4),
> MFD_CELL_BASIC("zl3073x-dpll", NULL, NULL, 0, 5),
> };
>
> rc = devm_mfd_add_devices(zldev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, dpll_cells,
> chip_info->num_channels, NULL, 0, NULL);
Yes, looks better, thank you.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Ivan Vecera wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 17. 04. 25 6:20 odp., Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, 16 Apr 2025, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> > >
> > > > Register DPLL sub-devices to expose this functionality provided
> > > > by ZL3073x chip family. Each sub-device represents one of the provided
> > > > DPLL channels.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c b/drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c
> > > > index 0bd31591245a2..fda77724a8452 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/zl3073x-core.c
> > > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > > > #include <linux/device.h>
> > > > #include <linux/export.h>
> > > > #include <linux/math64.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
> > > > #include <linux/mfd/zl3073x.h>
> > > > #include <linux/mfd/zl3073x_regs.h>
> > > > #include <linux/module.h>
> > > > @@ -774,6 +775,20 @@ int zl3073x_dev_probe(struct zl3073x_dev *zldev,
> > > > if (rc)
> > > > return rc;
> > > > + /* Add DPLL sub-device cell for each DPLL channel */
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < chip_info->num_channels; i++) {
> > > > + struct mfd_cell dpll_dev = MFD_CELL_BASIC("zl3073x-dpll", NULL,
> > > > + NULL, 0, i);
> > >
> > > Create a static one of these with the maximum amount of channels.
> >
> > Like this?
> >
> > static const struct mfd_cell dpll_cells[] = {
> > MFD_CELL_BASIC("zl3073x-dpll", NULL, NULL, 0, 1),
> > MFD_CELL_BASIC("zl3073x-dpll", NULL, NULL, 0, 2),
> > MFD_CELL_BASIC("zl3073x-dpll", NULL, NULL, 0, 3),
> > MFD_CELL_BASIC("zl3073x-dpll", NULL, NULL, 0, 4),
> > MFD_CELL_BASIC("zl3073x-dpll", NULL, NULL, 0, 5),
> > };
> >
> > rc = devm_mfd_add_devices(zldev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, dpll_cells,
> > chip_info->num_channels, NULL, 0, NULL);
>
> Yes, looks better, thank you.
Sorry, just a thought. Since this is non-standard, please make it easy
on the reader by providing a comment to say that this call will register
a variable number of devices depending on the value of num_channels.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.