The existing sideband driver only registers sidebands without tracking
their active usage. To address this, sideband will now record its active
usage when it creates/removes interrupters. In addition, a new api is
introduced to provide a means for other dirvers to fetch sideband
activity information on a USB host controller.
Signed-off-by: Guan-Yu Lin <guanyulin@google.com>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-sideband.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/usb/xhci-sideband.h | 9 +++++++
2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-sideband.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-sideband.c
index d49f9886dd84..67f31b0ec726 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-sideband.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-sideband.c
@@ -266,6 +266,31 @@ xhci_sideband_get_event_buffer(struct xhci_sideband *sb)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xhci_sideband_get_event_buffer);
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_SIDEBAND_SUSPEND)
+/**
+ * xhci_sideband_check - check the existence of active sidebands
+ * @hcd: the host controller driver associated with the target host controller
+ *
+ * Allow other drivers, such as usb controller driver, to check if there are
+ * any sideband activity on the host controller. This information could be used
+ * for power management or other forms of resource management.
+ *
+ * Returns true on any active sideband existence, false otherwise.
+ */
+bool xhci_sideband_check(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
+{
+ struct usb_device *udev = hcd->self.root_hub;
+ bool active;
+
+ device_lock(&udev->dev);
+ active = usb_offload_check(udev);
+ device_unlock(&udev->dev);
+
+ return active;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xhci_sideband_check);
+#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_SIDEBAND_SUSPEND) */
+
/**
* xhci_sideband_create_interrupter - creates a new interrupter for this sideband
* @sb: sideband instance for this usb device
@@ -286,6 +311,7 @@ xhci_sideband_create_interrupter(struct xhci_sideband *sb, int num_seg,
bool ip_autoclear, u32 imod_interval, int intr_num)
{
int ret = 0;
+ struct usb_device *udev;
if (!sb || !sb->xhci)
return -ENODEV;
@@ -304,6 +330,11 @@ xhci_sideband_create_interrupter(struct xhci_sideband *sb, int num_seg,
goto out;
}
+ udev = sb->vdev->udev;
+ device_lock(&udev->dev);
+ ret = usb_offload_get(udev);
+ device_unlock(&udev->dev);
+
sb->ir->ip_autoclear = ip_autoclear;
out:
@@ -323,6 +354,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xhci_sideband_create_interrupter);
void
xhci_sideband_remove_interrupter(struct xhci_sideband *sb)
{
+ struct usb_device *udev;
+
if (!sb || !sb->ir)
return;
@@ -330,6 +363,16 @@ xhci_sideband_remove_interrupter(struct xhci_sideband *sb)
xhci_remove_secondary_interrupter(xhci_to_hcd(sb->xhci), sb->ir);
sb->ir = NULL;
+ udev = sb->vdev->udev;
+
+ if (udev->state == USB_STATE_NOTATTACHED) {
+ usb_offload_put(udev);
+ } else {
+ device_lock(&udev->dev);
+ usb_offload_put(udev);
+ device_unlock(&udev->dev);
+ }
+
mutex_unlock(&sb->mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xhci_sideband_remove_interrupter);
diff --git a/include/linux/usb/xhci-sideband.h b/include/linux/usb/xhci-sideband.h
index 45288c392f6e..5174cc5afc98 100644
--- a/include/linux/usb/xhci-sideband.h
+++ b/include/linux/usb/xhci-sideband.h
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <linux/scatterlist.h>
#include <linux/usb.h>
+#include <linux/usb/hcd.h>
#define EP_CTX_PER_DEV 31 /* FIXME defined twice, from xhci.h */
@@ -83,6 +84,14 @@ xhci_sideband_get_endpoint_buffer(struct xhci_sideband *sb,
struct usb_host_endpoint *host_ep);
struct sg_table *
xhci_sideband_get_event_buffer(struct xhci_sideband *sb);
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_SIDEBAND_SUSPEND)
+bool xhci_sideband_check(struct usb_hcd *hcd);
+#else
+static inline bool xhci_sideband_check(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
+{ return false; }
+#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_SIDEBAND_SUSPEND) */
+
int
xhci_sideband_create_interrupter(struct xhci_sideband *sb, int num_seg,
bool ip_autoclear, u32 imod_interval, int intr_num);
--
2.49.0.604.gff1f9ca942-goog
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 02:43:03PM +0000, Guan-Yu Lin wrote: > The existing sideband driver only registers sidebands without tracking > their active usage. To address this, sideband will now record its active > usage when it creates/removes interrupters. In addition, a new api is > introduced to provide a means for other dirvers to fetch sideband > activity information on a USB host controller. > > Signed-off-by: Guan-Yu Lin <guanyulin@google.com> > --- > drivers/usb/host/xhci-sideband.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/usb/xhci-sideband.h | 9 +++++++ > 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-sideband.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-sideband.c > index d49f9886dd84..67f31b0ec726 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-sideband.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-sideband.c > @@ -266,6 +266,31 @@ xhci_sideband_get_event_buffer(struct xhci_sideband *sb) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xhci_sideband_get_event_buffer); > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_SIDEBAND_SUSPEND) > +/** > + * xhci_sideband_check - check the existence of active sidebands > + * @hcd: the host controller driver associated with the target host controller > + * > + * Allow other drivers, such as usb controller driver, to check if there are > + * any sideband activity on the host controller. This information could be used > + * for power management or other forms of resource management. > + * > + * Returns true on any active sideband existence, false otherwise. > + */ > +bool xhci_sideband_check(struct usb_hcd *hcd) > +{ > + struct usb_device *udev = hcd->self.root_hub; > + bool active; > + > + device_lock(&udev->dev); > + active = usb_offload_check(udev); > + device_unlock(&udev->dev); > + > + return active; What happens if the value changes right after reading it? What are you going to do with the value? > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xhci_sideband_check); > +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_SIDEBAND_SUSPEND) */ > + > /** > * xhci_sideband_create_interrupter - creates a new interrupter for this sideband > * @sb: sideband instance for this usb device > @@ -286,6 +311,7 @@ xhci_sideband_create_interrupter(struct xhci_sideband *sb, int num_seg, > bool ip_autoclear, u32 imod_interval, int intr_num) > { > int ret = 0; > + struct usb_device *udev; > > if (!sb || !sb->xhci) > return -ENODEV; > @@ -304,6 +330,11 @@ xhci_sideband_create_interrupter(struct xhci_sideband *sb, int num_seg, > goto out; > } > > + udev = sb->vdev->udev; > + device_lock(&udev->dev); > + ret = usb_offload_get(udev); > + device_unlock(&udev->dev); A "raw" call to device_lock/unlock feels rough, and harsh, why doesn't the function do that itself? thanks, greg k-h
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 7:14 PM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 02:43:03PM +0000, Guan-Yu Lin wrote: > > +bool xhci_sideband_check(struct usb_hcd *hcd) > > +{ > > + struct usb_device *udev = hcd->self.root_hub; > > + bool active; > > + > > + device_lock(&udev->dev); > > + active = usb_offload_check(udev); > > + device_unlock(&udev->dev); > > + > > + return active; > > What happens if the value changes right after reading it? What are you > going to do with the value? > Currently xhci_sideband_check() is only called when the xhci platform device is going to suspend. Given that the usb devices should be either already suspended or being marked as "offload_at_suspend" right now, it should be safe if we ensure that "offload_usage" doesn't change at this moment. Let me update usb_offload_get()/usb_offload_put() to achieve this. > > > > + udev = sb->vdev->udev; > > + device_lock(&udev->dev); > > + ret = usb_offload_get(udev); > > + device_unlock(&udev->dev); > > A "raw" call to device_lock/unlock feels rough, and harsh, why doesn't > the function do that itself? > > thanks, > > greg k-h The design is to align with usb_offload_put(). For usb_offload_put(), we don't need to lock the device when the device state is USB_STATE_NOTATTACHED. Hence, we put the device_lock()/device_unlock() outside of usb_offload_get()/usb_offload_put(). Let me also change the functions to usb_lock_device()/usb_unlock_device() for better coding style. Regards, Guan-Yu
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.