.../dts/nuvoton/nuvoton-common-npcm8xx.dtsi | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
The npcm 8xx chip has 2 EHCI and 2 OHCI hosts with driver support
already existing in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: William A. Kennington III <william@wkennington.com>
---
.../dts/nuvoton/nuvoton-common-npcm8xx.dtsi | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nuvoton/nuvoton-common-npcm8xx.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nuvoton/nuvoton-common-npcm8xx.dtsi
index ccebcb11c05e..b2595f5c146b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nuvoton/nuvoton-common-npcm8xx.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nuvoton/nuvoton-common-npcm8xx.dtsi
@@ -63,6 +63,34 @@ mc: memory-controller@f0824000 {
status = "disabled";
};
+ ehci0: usb@f0828100 {
+ compatible = "nuvoton,npcm750-ehci";
+ reg = <0x0 0xf0828100 0x0 0xf00>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 61 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+
+ ehci1: usb@f082a100 {
+ compatible = "nuvoton,npcm750-ehci";
+ reg = <0x0 0xf082a100 0x0 0xf00>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 63 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+
+ ohci0: usb@f0829000 {
+ compatible = "generic-ohci";
+ reg = <0x0 0xf0829000 0x0 0x1000>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 62 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+
+ ohci1: usb@f082b000 {
+ compatible = "generic-ohci";
+ reg = <0x0 0xf082b000 0x0 0x1000>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 64 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+
apb {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
--
2.49.0.604.gff1f9ca942-goog
On Tue, 2025-04-15 at 17:18 -0700, William A. Kennington III wrote: > The npcm 8xx chip has 2 EHCI and 2 OHCI hosts with driver support > already existing in the kernel. > > Signed-off-by: William A. Kennington III <william@wkennington.com> Please rebase to address fuzz as noted here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2ed50b1463f62a829f863b889ab818f492b73946.camel@codeconstruct.com.au/ Andrew
On 16/04/2025 02:18, William A. Kennington III wrote: > The npcm 8xx chip has 2 EHCI and 2 OHCI hosts with driver support > already existing in the kernel. > > Signed-off-by: William A. Kennington III <william@wkennington.com> > --- > .../dts/nuvoton/nuvoton-common-npcm8xx.dtsi | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ Please do not send 10 separate patches, but one patchset for given subsystem. > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) Best regards, Krzysztof
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 11:52 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > On 16/04/2025 02:18, William A. Kennington III wrote: > > The npcm 8xx chip has 2 EHCI and 2 OHCI hosts with driver support > > already existing in the kernel. > > > > Signed-off-by: William A. Kennington III <william@wkennington.com> > > --- > > .../dts/nuvoton/nuvoton-common-npcm8xx.dtsi | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ > > Please do not send 10 separate patches, but one patchset for given > subsystem. When I send a patchset should I add the reply-to tags for all of these previous reviews? Or just resend as a new review? > > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
On 25/04/2025 23:18, William Kennington wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 11:52 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> On 16/04/2025 02:18, William A. Kennington III wrote: >>> The npcm 8xx chip has 2 EHCI and 2 OHCI hosts with driver support >>> already existing in the kernel. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: William A. Kennington III <william@wkennington.com> >>> --- >>> .../dts/nuvoton/nuvoton-common-npcm8xx.dtsi | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ >> >> Please do not send 10 separate patches, but one patchset for given >> subsystem. > > When I send a patchset should I add the reply-to tags for all of these > previous reviews? Or just resend as a new review? I don't understand what you are asking me. You NEVER add manually in-reply to. You should use either git send-email or b4 or patman. Nothing else, no manual edits, no weird headers. If you ask about review, that's entirely different topic - see submitting patches. BTW, kernel docs also explain how to actually send these emails... Best regards, Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof, Thanks a lot for your review. Can we send one patch that includes all nodes that are existing NPCM8xx drivers in the kernel, or do you prefer a patchset that contains patches for each NPCM8xx driver? Thanks, Tomer On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 at 09:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > On 16/04/2025 02:18, William A. Kennington III wrote: > > The npcm 8xx chip has 2 EHCI and 2 OHCI hosts with driver support > > already existing in the kernel. > > > > Signed-off-by: William A. Kennington III <william@wkennington.com> > > --- > > .../dts/nuvoton/nuvoton-common-npcm8xx.dtsi | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ > > Please do not send 10 separate patches, but one patchset for given > subsystem. > > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.