drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase.h | 2 +- drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
1. Fix the compile error reported by the kernel test robot by modifying
the condition used to detect overflow in rtase_calc_time_mitigation.
2. Fix the compile warning reported by the kernel test robot by
increasing the size of ivec->name.
3. Fix a type error in min_t.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503182158.nkAlbJWX-lkp@intel.com/
Fixes: a36e9f5cfe9e ("rtase: Add support for a pci table in this module")
Signed-off-by: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@realtek.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase.h | 2 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase.h
index 2bbfcad613ab..1e63b5826da1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase.h
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ union rtase_rx_desc {
#define RTASE_VLAN_TAG_MASK GENMASK(15, 0)
#define RTASE_RX_PKT_SIZE_MASK GENMASK(13, 0)
-#define RTASE_IVEC_NAME_SIZE (IFNAMSIZ + 10)
+#define RTASE_IVEC_NAME_SIZE (IFNAMSIZ + 14)
struct rtase_int_vector {
struct rtase_private *tp;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
index 2aacc1996796..bc856fb3d6f3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
@@ -1923,10 +1923,10 @@ static u16 rtase_calc_time_mitigation(u32 time_us)
u8 msb, time_count, time_unit;
u16 int_miti;
- time_us = min_t(int, time_us, RTASE_MITI_MAX_TIME);
+ time_us = min_t(u32, time_us, RTASE_MITI_MAX_TIME);
- msb = fls(time_us);
- if (msb >= RTASE_MITI_COUNT_BIT_NUM) {
+ if (time_us > RTASE_MITI_TIME_COUNT_MASK) {
+ msb = fls(time_us);
time_unit = msb - RTASE_MITI_COUNT_BIT_NUM;
time_count = time_us >> (msb - RTASE_MITI_COUNT_BIT_NUM);
} else {
@@ -1945,7 +1945,7 @@ static u16 rtase_calc_packet_num_mitigation(u16 pkt_num)
u8 msb, pkt_num_count, pkt_num_unit;
u16 int_miti;
- pkt_num = min_t(int, pkt_num, RTASE_MITI_MAX_PKT_NUM);
+ pkt_num = min_t(u16, pkt_num, RTASE_MITI_MAX_PKT_NUM);
if (pkt_num > 60) {
pkt_num_unit = RTASE_MITI_MAX_PKT_NUM_IDX;
--
2.34.1
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 05:36:45PM +0800, Justin Lai wrote:
> 1. Fix the compile error reported by the kernel test robot by modifying
> the condition used to detect overflow in rtase_calc_time_mitigation.
> 2. Fix the compile warning reported by the kernel test robot by
> increasing the size of ivec->name.
> 3. Fix a type error in min_t.
Looks like three patches should be used, not one. You can then include
the details of what the test robot reported making it easier to
understand each fix.
Andrew
---
pw-bot: cr
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 05:36:45PM +0800, Justin Lai wrote: > > 1. Fix the compile error reported by the kernel test robot by modifying > > the condition used to detect overflow in rtase_calc_time_mitigation. > > 2. Fix the compile warning reported by the kernel test robot by > > increasing the size of ivec->name. > > 3. Fix a type error in min_t. > > Looks like three patches should be used, not one. You can then include > the details of what the test robot reported making it easier to > understand each fix. > > > Andrew > > --- > pw-bot: cr Hi Andrew, Thank you for your response. I will split this patch into three separate patches and include the detailed report from the kernel test robot. Thanks, Justin
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.