On 4/11/2025 7:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025, at 15:31, Akshay Gupta wrote:
>> At present, sbrmi driver under hwmon subsystem, is probed as an i2c
>> driver,
>> fetches data using APML specified protocol and reports through hwmon
>> power sensor.
>>
>> AMD provides additional information using custom protocols, which cannot be
>> enumerated as hwmon sensors. Hence, move the existing functionality from hwmon/
>> to misc/ and add support for following custom protocols
>> - read Processor feature capabilities and configuration information
>> through side band.
>> - read Machine Check Architecture(MCA) registers over sideband.
>> The information is accessed for range of MCA registers by passing
>> register address and thread ID to the protocol.
>>
>> NOTE: AMD defines Advanced Platform Management Link (APML) interface
>> which provides
>> system management functionality access to the baseboard management
>> controller (BMC).
> I think this addresses all my comments, thanks for the update.
>
>> Open-sourced and widely used [1]_ will continue to provide user-space
>> programmable API.
>>
>> .. [1] https://github.com/amd/esmi_oob_library
> I'm still a little uneasy about the low-level mailbox interface
> being exposed in a character device, but assuming that everyone
> else is fine with having that in principle, I think the way the
> interface is structured in this version is good enough.
>
> Arnd
Thank you for quick review.
I see a kernel test robot error in patch 09/10, where require to use
"__u16" instead of "u16" in the structure. I will submit patch version 9
to address this.
Can I add your "Reviewed-by:" for the other patches?