From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
struct gpio_chip now has callbacks for setting line values that return
an integer, allowing to indicate failures. Convert the driver to using
them.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/mach-s3c/gpio-samsung.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c/gpio-samsung.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c/gpio-samsung.c
index 87daaa09e2c3..ea496958f488 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c/gpio-samsung.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c/gpio-samsung.c
@@ -430,8 +430,8 @@ static int samsung_gpiolib_4bit2_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
return 0;
}
-static void samsung_gpiolib_set(struct gpio_chip *chip,
- unsigned offset, int value)
+static int samsung_gpiolib_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
+ int value)
{
struct samsung_gpio_chip *ourchip = to_samsung_gpio(chip);
void __iomem *base = ourchip->base;
@@ -447,6 +447,8 @@ static void samsung_gpiolib_set(struct gpio_chip *chip,
__raw_writel(dat, base + 0x04);
samsung_gpio_unlock(ourchip, flags);
+
+ return 0;
}
static int samsung_gpiolib_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
@@ -515,7 +517,7 @@ static void __init samsung_gpiolib_add(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip)
if (!gc->direction_output)
gc->direction_output = samsung_gpiolib_2bit_output;
if (!gc->set)
- gc->set = samsung_gpiolib_set;
+ gc->set_rv = samsung_gpiolib_set;
if (!gc->get)
gc->get = samsung_gpiolib_get;
--
2.45.2
On 07/04/2025 09:09, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > struct gpio_chip now has callbacks for setting line values that return > an integer, allowing to indicate failures. Convert the driver to using > them. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > --- > arch/arm/mach-s3c/gpio-samsung.c | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) This was applied a week ago, but it is not in the next (next-20250414). Are you sure you feed linux-next with all your patches? Best regards, Krzysztof
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 8:23 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > On 07/04/2025 09:09, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > > > struct gpio_chip now has callbacks for setting line values that return > > an integer, allowing to indicate failures. Convert the driver to using > > them. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-s3c/gpio-samsung.c | 8 +++++--- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > This was applied a week ago, but it is not in the next (next-20250414). > Are you sure you feed linux-next with all your patches? > > Best regards, > Krzysztof Hi! This is a bit of an exception for me. As discussed with Arnd[1] I picked the patches up into a new branch and sent out a PR to arm-soc[2]. Once Arnd merges the PR, the patches will appear in next, I don't have any ARM branch to feed into linux-next. Bartosz [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/18d59ff1-a357-413c-bde2-961ae0c9b5f2@app.fastmail.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250409083513.21115-1-brgl@bgdev.pl/
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.