Fixes typos and corrects spelling in the comments.

Signed-off-by: Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
index 8fe5e1b47..bfa55c1ea 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
  *
  * Of course, non-timer wakeup sources are more important in some use cases,
  * but even then it is generally unnecessary to consider idle duration values
- * greater than the time time till the next timer event, referred as the sleep
+ * greater than the time till the next timer event, referred as the sleep
  * length in what follows, because the closest timer will ultimately wake up the
  * CPU anyway unless it is woken up earlier.
  *
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static int teo_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev,
 		struct cpuidle_state *s = &drv->states[i];
 
 		/*
-		 * Update the sums of idle state mertics for all of the states
+		 * Update the sums of idle state metrics for all of the states
 		 * shallower than the current one.
 		 */
 		intercept_sum += prev_bin->intercepts;
-- 
2.34.1

On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 8:09 AM Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Fixes typos and corrects spelling in the comments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
> index 8fe5e1b47..bfa55c1ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>   *
>   * Of course, non-timer wakeup sources are more important in some use cases,
>   * but even then it is generally unnecessary to consider idle duration values
> - * greater than the time time till the next timer event, referred as the sleep
> + * greater than the time till the next timer event, referred as the sleep
>   * length in what follows, because the closest timer will ultimately wake up the
>   * CPU anyway unless it is woken up earlier.
>   *
> @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static int teo_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>                 struct cpuidle_state *s = &drv->states[i];
>
>                 /*
> -                * Update the sums of idle state mertics for all of the states
> +                * Update the sums of idle state metrics for all of the states
>                  * shallower than the current one.
>                  */
>                 intercept_sum += prev_bin->intercepts;
> --

Applied as 6.16 material with some edits in the subject and changelog, thanks!