[v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add DMA controller for RK3528

[PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add DMA controller for RK3528

Posted by Chukun Pan 1 month, 2 weeks ago

Add DMA controller dt node for RK3528 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Chukun Pan <amadeus@jmu.edu.cn>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi
index 7f1ffd6003f5..c366766ee3f5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi
@@ -493,6 +493,24 @@ sdhci: mmc@ffbf0000 {
 			status = "disabled";
 		};
 
+		dmac: dma-controller@ffd60000 {
+			compatible = "arm,pl330", "arm,primecell";
+			reg = <0x0 0xffd60000 0x0 0x4000>;
+			clocks = <&cru ACLK_DMAC>;
+			clock-names = "apb_pclk";
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 2 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 4 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 5 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 6 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 16 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			arm,pl330-periph-burst;
+			#dma-cells = <1>;
+		};
+
 		pinctrl: pinctrl {
 			compatible = "rockchip,rk3528-pinctrl";
 			rockchip,grf = <&ioc_grf>;
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add DMA controller for RK3528

Posted by Yao Zi 1 month, 1 week ago

On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 06:00:19PM +0800, Chukun Pan wrote:
> Add DMA controller dt node for RK3528 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chukun Pan <amadeus@jmu.edu.cn>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi
> index 7f1ffd6003f5..c366766ee3f5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi
> @@ -493,6 +493,24 @@ sdhci: mmc@ffbf0000 {
>  			status = "disabled";
>  		};
>  
> +		dmac: dma-controller@ffd60000 {
> +			compatible = "arm,pl330", "arm,primecell";
> +			reg = <0x0 0xffd60000 0x0 0x4000>;
> +			clocks = <&cru ACLK_DMAC>;
> +			clock-names = "apb_pclk";
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 2 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 4 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 5 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 6 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +				     <GIC_SPI 16 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			arm,pl330-periph-burst;

Should this be moved above "clocks" line to sort the properties?

Thanks,
Yao Zi

> +			#dma-cells = <1>;
> +		};
> +
>  		pinctrl: pinctrl {
>  			compatible = "rockchip,rk3528-pinctrl";
>  			rockchip,grf = <&ioc_grf>;
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add DMA controller for RK3528

Posted by Jonas Karlman 1 month, 1 week ago

On 2025-04-01 19:35, Yao Zi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 06:00:19PM +0800, Chukun Pan wrote:
>> Add DMA controller dt node for RK3528 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chukun Pan <amadeus@jmu.edu.cn>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi
>> index 7f1ffd6003f5..c366766ee3f5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi
>> @@ -493,6 +493,24 @@ sdhci: mmc@ffbf0000 {
>>  			status = "disabled";
>>  		};
>>  
>> +		dmac: dma-controller@ffd60000 {
>> +			compatible = "arm,pl330", "arm,primecell";
>> +			reg = <0x0 0xffd60000 0x0 0x4000>;
>> +			clocks = <&cru ACLK_DMAC>;
>> +			clock-names = "apb_pclk";
>> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +				     <GIC_SPI 1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +				     <GIC_SPI 2 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +				     <GIC_SPI 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +				     <GIC_SPI 4 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +				     <GIC_SPI 5 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +				     <GIC_SPI 6 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +				     <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> +				     <GIC_SPI 16 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> +			arm,pl330-periph-burst;
> 
> Should this be moved above "clocks" line to sort the properties?

Not preferred according to [1], vendor-prefixed props is ordered after
non-vendor-prefixed props.

"""
The following order of properties in device nodes is preferred:
- "compatible"
- "reg"
- "ranges"
- Standard/common properties (defined by common bindings, e.g. without
  vendor-prefixes)
- Vendor-specific properties
- "status" (if applicable)
- Child nodes, where each node is preceded with a blank line

The "status" property is by default "okay", thus it can be omitted.

The above-described ordering follows this approach:
- Most important properties start the node: compatible then bus
  addressing to match unit address.
- Each node will have common properties in similar place.
- Status is the last information to annotate that device node is or is
  not finished (board resources are needed).
"""

[1] https://docs.kernel.org/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.html#order-of-properties-in-device-node

Regards,
Jonas

> 
> Thanks,
> Yao Zi
> 
>> +			#dma-cells = <1>;
>> +		};
>> +
>>  		pinctrl: pinctrl {
>>  			compatible = "rockchip,rk3528-pinctrl";
>>  			rockchip,grf = <&ioc_grf>;
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>>