[PATCH 0/3] Additional fixes for dma coherent allocator

Abdiel Janulgue posted 3 patches 8 months, 3 weeks ago
rust/kernel/dma.rs       | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
samples/rust/rust_dma.rs |  21 ++----
2 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
[PATCH 0/3] Additional fixes for dma coherent allocator
Posted by Abdiel Janulgue 8 months, 3 weeks ago
Additional fixups to improve the documentation and make the read/write
macros return Result as suggested by Andreas Hindborg as well as support
for reading and writing large blocks of data.

Abdiel Janulgue (3):
  rust: dma: be consistent in using the `coherent` nomenclature
  rust: dma: convert the read/write macros to return Result
  rust: dma: add as_slice/write functions for CoherentAllocation

 rust/kernel/dma.rs       | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 samples/rust/rust_dma.rs |  21 ++----
 2 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)


base-commit: e6ea10d5dbe082c54add289b44f08c9fcfe658af
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Additional fixes for dma coherent allocator
Posted by Miguel Ojeda 8 months, 3 weeks ago
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 9:13 PM Abdiel Janulgue
<abdiel.janulgue@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Additional fixups to improve the documentation and make the read/write
> macros return Result as suggested by Andreas Hindborg as well as support
> for reading and writing large blocks of data.

As far as I can tell, these seem improvements more than fixes -- so
can they go through the normal process for the next cycle?

Thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Additional fixes for dma coherent allocator
Posted by Abdiel Janulgue 8 months, 3 weeks ago
Hi Miguel,

On 26/03/2025 22:18, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 9:13 PM Abdiel Janulgue
> <abdiel.janulgue@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Additional fixups to improve the documentation and make the read/write
>> macros return Result as suggested by Andreas Hindborg as well as support
>> for reading and writing large blocks of data.
> 
> As far as I can tell, these seem improvements more than fixes -- so
> can they go through the normal process for the next cycle?
> 
Sure! I'm totally fine with it.

Regards,
Abdiel