The Liebherr's BTT devices are using spidev to communicate via
SPI to monitoring devices. Extend compatibles to allow proper
DTS description.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
---
Changes for v2:
- Use 'lwn' vendor prefix instead of 'lwe' (as the former one is already
  well used in Linux sources).
---
 drivers/spi/spidev.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spidev.c b/drivers/spi/spidev.c
index 6108959c28d9..2568240490fa 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spidev.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spidev.c
@@ -708,6 +708,7 @@ static const struct spi_device_id spidev_spi_ids[] = {
 	{ .name = /* elgin */ "jg10309-01" },
 	{ .name = /* gocontroll */ "moduline-module-slot"},
 	{ .name = /* lineartechnology */ "ltc2488" },
+	{ .name = /* lwn */ "btt" },
 	{ .name = /* lwn */ "bk4" },
 	{ .name = /* lwn */ "bk4-spi" },
 	{ .name = /* menlo */ "m53cpld" },
@@ -740,6 +741,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id spidev_dt_ids[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "elgin,jg10309-01", .data = &spidev_of_check },
 	{ .compatible = "gocontroll,moduline-module-slot", .data = &spidev_of_check},
 	{ .compatible = "lineartechnology,ltc2488", .data = &spidev_of_check },
+	{ .compatible = "lwn,btt", .data = &spidev_of_check },
 	{ .compatible = "lwn,bk4", .data = &spidev_of_check },
 	{ .compatible = "lwn,bk4-spi", .data = &spidev_of_check },
 	{ .compatible = "menlo,m53cpld", .data = &spidev_of_check },
-- 
2.39.5

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 06:24:45PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:

> Changes for v2:
> - Use 'lwn' vendor prefix instead of 'lwe' (as the former one is already
>   well used in Linux sources).

Are you sure?

Note also that as previously mentioned I expect to see a binding
document update too which doesn't appear to be here.

Please don't send new patches in reply to old patches or serieses, this
makes it harder for both people and tools to understand what is going
on - it can bury things in mailboxes and make it difficult to keep track
of what current patches are, both for the new patches and the old ones.

Hi Mark,

> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 06:24:45PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> 
> > Changes for v2:
> > - Use 'lwn' vendor prefix instead of 'lwe' (as the former one is
> > already well used in Linux sources).  
> 
> Are you sure?

Yes, the lwn is already present for a quite few years for this company.
The lwe is just the different branch.

> 
> Note also that as previously mentioned I expect to see a binding
> document update too which doesn't appear to be here.
> 

I've just send it to be accepted to trivial-devices.yaml

> Please don't send new patches in reply to old patches or serieses,
> this makes it harder for both people and tools to understand what is
> going on - it can bury things in mailboxes and make it difficult to
> keep track of what current patches are, both for the new patches and
> the old ones.

Ok, I thought that it would be the opposite - that you would see v2 as
the reply to the old one - especially that the change is just a single
letter.



Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

--

DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@denx.de

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 06:45:53PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 06:24:45PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:

> > Note also that as previously mentioned I expect to see a binding
> > document update too which doesn't appear to be here.

> I've just send it to be accepted to trivial-devices.yaml

As previously mentioned you should send the bindings update along with
the driver code.

> > Please don't send new patches in reply to old patches or serieses,
> > this makes it harder for both people and tools to understand what is
> > going on - it can bury things in mailboxes and make it difficult to
> > keep track of what current patches are, both for the new patches and
> > the old ones.

> Ok, I thought that it would be the opposite - that you would see v2 as
> the reply to the old one - especially that the change is just a single
> letter.

That's exactly the problem.

Hi Mark,

> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 06:45:53PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 06:24:45PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:  
> 
> > > Note also that as previously mentioned I expect to see a binding
> > > document update too which doesn't appear to be here.  
> 
> > I've just send it to be accepted to trivial-devices.yaml  
> 
> As previously mentioned you should send the bindings update along with
> the driver code.

Ok, so first shall be the patch 0001, which updates
trivial-devices.yaml and then 0002, with changes for spidev (this
patch).

> 
> > > Please don't send new patches in reply to old patches or serieses,
> > > this makes it harder for both people and tools to understand what
> > > is going on - it can bury things in mailboxes and make it
> > > difficult to keep track of what current patches are, both for the
> > > new patches and the old ones.  
> 
> > Ok, I thought that it would be the opposite - that you would see v2
> > as the reply to the old one - especially that the change is just a
> > single letter.  
> 
> That's exactly the problem.

Ok. I will not use --in-reply-to= switch.


Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

--

DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@denx.de