drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
If link_conf_dereference_protected() or mt7996_vif_link()
or link_sta_dereference_protected() fail the code jumps to
the error_unlink label and returns ret which is uninitialised.
Fix this by setting err before jumping to error_unlink.
Fixes: c7e4fc362443 ("wifi: mt76: mt7996: Update mt7996_mcu_add_sta to MLO support")
Fixes: dd82a9e02c05 ("wifi: mt76: mt7996: Rely on mt7996_sta_link in sta_add/sta_remove callbacks")
Signed-off-by: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c
index 91c64e3a0860..78f7f1fc867e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c
@@ -998,16 +998,22 @@ mt7996_mac_sta_add_links(struct mt7996_dev *dev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
continue;
link_conf = link_conf_dereference_protected(vif, link_id);
- if (!link_conf)
+ if (!link_conf) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
goto error_unlink;
+ }
link = mt7996_vif_link(dev, vif, link_id);
- if (!link)
+ if (!link) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
goto error_unlink;
+ }
link_sta = link_sta_dereference_protected(sta, link_id);
- if (!link_sta)
+ if (!link_sta) {
+ err = -EINVAL
goto error_unlink;
+ }
err = mt7996_mac_sta_init_link(dev, link_conf, link_sta, link,
link_id);
--
2.39.5
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 9:19 PM Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If link_conf_dereference_protected() or mt7996_vif_link()
> or link_sta_dereference_protected() fail the code jumps to
> the error_unlink label and returns ret which is uninitialised.
>
> Fix this by setting err before jumping to error_unlink.
>
> Fixes: c7e4fc362443 ("wifi: mt76: mt7996: Update mt7996_mcu_add_sta to MLO support")
> Fixes: dd82a9e02c05 ("wifi: mt76: mt7996: Rely on mt7996_sta_link in sta_add/sta_remove callbacks")
> Signed-off-by: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c
> index 91c64e3a0860..78f7f1fc867e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c
> @@ -998,16 +998,22 @@ mt7996_mac_sta_add_links(struct mt7996_dev *dev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
> continue;
>
> link_conf = link_conf_dereference_protected(vif, link_id);
> - if (!link_conf)
> + if (!link_conf) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> goto error_unlink;
> + }
>
> link = mt7996_vif_link(dev, vif, link_id);
> - if (!link)
> + if (!link) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> goto error_unlink;
> + }
>
> link_sta = link_sta_dereference_protected(sta, link_id);
> - if (!link_sta)
> + if (!link_sta) {
> + err = -EINVAL
You are missing a semicolon at the end of the line.
To also do some bike shedding, you could initialize err (with 0 or
-EINVAL), and then change the err return to return err ? : -EINVAL;.
But your way has an explicit error code assigned to each failure, even
if it is always the same. So I won't claim my suggestion is better.
Best regards,
Jonas
On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 12:51:57PM +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 9:19 PM Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > If link_conf_dereference_protected() or mt7996_vif_link()
> > or link_sta_dereference_protected() fail the code jumps to
> > the error_unlink label and returns ret which is uninitialised.
> >
> > Fix this by setting err before jumping to error_unlink.
> >
> > Fixes: c7e4fc362443 ("wifi: mt76: mt7996: Update mt7996_mcu_add_sta to MLO support")
> > Fixes: dd82a9e02c05 ("wifi: mt76: mt7996: Rely on mt7996_sta_link in sta_add/sta_remove callbacks")
> > Signed-off-by: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c | 12 +++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c
> > index 91c64e3a0860..78f7f1fc867e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c
> > @@ -998,16 +998,22 @@ mt7996_mac_sta_add_links(struct mt7996_dev *dev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
> > continue;
> >
> > link_conf = link_conf_dereference_protected(vif, link_id);
> > - if (!link_conf)
> > + if (!link_conf) {
> > + err = -EINVAL;
> > goto error_unlink;
> > + }
> >
> > link = mt7996_vif_link(dev, vif, link_id);
> > - if (!link)
> > + if (!link) {
> > + err = -EINVAL;
> > goto error_unlink;
> > + }
> >
> > link_sta = link_sta_dereference_protected(sta, link_id);
> > - if (!link_sta)
> > + if (!link_sta) {
> > + err = -EINVAL
>
> You are missing a semicolon at the end of the line.
>
Good spot! not sure how that happened but I will resend a v2 patch.
> To also do some bike shedding, you could initialize err (with 0 or
> -EINVAL), and then change the err return to return err ? : -EINVAL;.
> But your way has an explicit error code assigned to each failure, even
> if it is always the same. So I won't claim my suggestion is better.
>
Thanks for the suggestion, I think this could work however I think my
current approach is more a bit more readable, so I will leave it as is.
Thanks,
Qasim
> Best regards,
> Jonas
> If link_conf_dereference_protected() or mt7996_vif_link()
> or link_sta_dereference_protected() fail the code jumps to
call failed?
> the error_unlink label and returns ret which is uninitialised.
a value from a local variable
which was not initialised properly?
Can the summary phrase be improved also another bit?
Regards,
Markus
…
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c
> @@ -998,16 +998,22 @@ mt7996_mac_sta_add_links(struct mt7996_dev *dev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
> continue;
>
> link_conf = link_conf_dereference_protected(vif, link_id);
> - if (!link_conf)
> + if (!link_conf) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> goto error_unlink;
> + }
>
> link = mt7996_vif_link(dev, vif, link_id);
> - if (!link)
> + if (!link) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> goto error_unlink;
> + }
…
I suggest to avoid such repeated error code assignments.
Can an additional label be applied instead for this purpose?
Regards,
Markus
On Sat, 2025-03-22 at 11:01 +0100, Markus Elfring wrote: > > I suggest to avoid such repeated error code assignments. > Can an additional label be applied instead for this purpose? > Please stop your "suggestions" on this list. None have really been helpful. johannes
>> I suggest to avoid such repeated error code assignments. >> Can an additional label be applied instead for this purpose? > > Please stop your "suggestions" on this list. None have really been > helpful. It seems that you care less then for the avoidance of duplicate source code also for affected error/exception handling. Regards, Markus
On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 11:01:18AM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c
> > @@ -998,16 +998,22 @@ mt7996_mac_sta_add_links(struct mt7996_dev *dev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
> > continue;
> >
> > link_conf = link_conf_dereference_protected(vif, link_id);
> > - if (!link_conf)
> > + if (!link_conf) {
> > + err = -EINVAL;
> > goto error_unlink;
> > + }
> >
> > link = mt7996_vif_link(dev, vif, link_id);
> > - if (!link)
> > + if (!link) {
> > + err = -EINVAL;
> > goto error_unlink;
> > + }
> …
>
> I suggest to avoid such repeated error code assignments.
> Can an additional label be applied instead for this purpose?
Maintainers get the final vote but generally when someone is doing
the work they get to decide.
I would say that generally the way that Qasim did it is normally
more readable and more future proof.
regards
dan carpenter
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:19:14PM +0000, Qasim Ijaz wrote:
> If link_conf_dereference_protected() or mt7996_vif_link()
> or link_sta_dereference_protected() fail the code jumps to
> the error_unlink label and returns ret which is uninitialised.
>
> Fix this by setting err before jumping to error_unlink.
>
> Fixes: c7e4fc362443 ("wifi: mt76: mt7996: Update mt7996_mcu_add_sta to MLO support")
> Fixes: dd82a9e02c05 ("wifi: mt76: mt7996: Rely on mt7996_sta_link in sta_add/sta_remove callbacks")
> Signed-off-by: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c
> index 91c64e3a0860..78f7f1fc867e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c
> @@ -998,16 +998,22 @@ mt7996_mac_sta_add_links(struct mt7996_dev *dev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
> continue;
What about if the list is empty or we hit this continue on every link?
regards,
dan carpenter
>
> link_conf = link_conf_dereference_protected(vif, link_id);
> - if (!link_conf)
> + if (!link_conf) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> goto error_unlink;
> + }
>
> link = mt7996_vif_link(dev, vif, link_id);
> - if (!link)
> + if (!link) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> goto error_unlink;
> + }
>
> link_sta = link_sta_dereference_protected(sta, link_id);
> - if (!link_sta)
> + if (!link_sta) {
> + err = -EINVAL
> goto error_unlink;
> + }
>
> err = mt7996_mac_sta_init_link(dev, link_conf, link_sta, link,
> link_id);
> --
> 2.39.5
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:19:14PM +0000, Qasim Ijaz wrote:
> > If link_conf_dereference_protected() or mt7996_vif_link()
> > or link_sta_dereference_protected() fail the code jumps to
> > the error_unlink label and returns ret which is uninitialised.
> >
> > Fix this by setting err before jumping to error_unlink.
> >
> > Fixes: c7e4fc362443 ("wifi: mt76: mt7996: Update mt7996_mcu_add_sta to MLO support")
> > Fixes: dd82a9e02c05 ("wifi: mt76: mt7996: Rely on mt7996_sta_link in sta_add/sta_remove callbacks")
> > Signed-off-by: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c | 12 +++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c
> > index 91c64e3a0860..78f7f1fc867e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c
> > @@ -998,16 +998,22 @@ mt7996_mac_sta_add_links(struct mt7996_dev *dev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
> > continue;
>
> What about if the list is empty or we hit this continue on every link?
we will return 0 and I guess that's fine, agree?
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
> >
> > link_conf = link_conf_dereference_protected(vif, link_id);
> > - if (!link_conf)
> > + if (!link_conf) {
> > + err = -EINVAL;
> > goto error_unlink;
> > + }
> >
> > link = mt7996_vif_link(dev, vif, link_id);
> > - if (!link)
> > + if (!link) {
> > + err = -EINVAL;
> > goto error_unlink;
> > + }
> >
> > link_sta = link_sta_dereference_protected(sta, link_id);
> > - if (!link_sta)
> > + if (!link_sta) {
> > + err = -EINVAL
> > goto error_unlink;
> > + }
> >
> > err = mt7996_mac_sta_init_link(dev, link_conf, link_sta, link,
> > link_id);
> > --
> > 2.39.5
> >
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 06:14:49PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:19:14PM +0000, Qasim Ijaz wrote:
> > > If link_conf_dereference_protected() or mt7996_vif_link()
> > > or link_sta_dereference_protected() fail the code jumps to
> > > the error_unlink label and returns ret which is uninitialised.
> > >
> > > Fix this by setting err before jumping to error_unlink.
> > >
> > > Fixes: c7e4fc362443 ("wifi: mt76: mt7996: Update mt7996_mcu_add_sta to MLO support")
> > > Fixes: dd82a9e02c05 ("wifi: mt76: mt7996: Rely on mt7996_sta_link in sta_add/sta_remove callbacks")
> > > Signed-off-by: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c | 12 +++++++++---
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c
> > > index 91c64e3a0860..78f7f1fc867e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c
> > > @@ -998,16 +998,22 @@ mt7996_mac_sta_add_links(struct mt7996_dev *dev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
> > > continue;
> >
> > What about if the list is empty or we hit this continue on every link?
>
> we will return 0 and I guess that's fine, agree?
>
Fine by me?
regards,
dan carpenter
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.