Remove unused members from struct lan78xx_net, including:

    driver_priv
    suspend_count
    link_on
    mdix_ctrl
    interface
    fc_autoneg
    fc_request_control

These fields are no longer used in the driver and can be safely removed
as part of a cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
---
 drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c | 9 ---------
 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c b/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
index 074ac4d1cbcb..fc6517bb3671 100644
--- a/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
@@ -414,7 +414,6 @@ struct lan78xx_net {
 	struct net_device	*net;
 	struct usb_device	*udev;
 	struct usb_interface	*intf;
-	void			*driver_priv;
 
 	unsigned int		tx_pend_data_len;
 	size_t			n_tx_urbs;
@@ -449,23 +448,15 @@ struct lan78xx_net {
 	unsigned long		flags;
 
 	wait_queue_head_t	*wait;
-	unsigned char		suspend_count;
 
 	unsigned int		maxpacket;
 	struct timer_list	stat_monitor;
 
 	unsigned long		data[5];
 
-	int			link_on;
-	u8			mdix_ctrl;
-
 	u32			chipid;
 	u32			chiprev;
 	struct mii_bus		*mdiobus;
-	phy_interface_t		interface;
-
-	int			fc_autoneg;
-	u8			fc_request_control;
 
 	int			delta;
 	struct statstage	stats;
-- 
2.39.5

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 09:49:52AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Remove unused members from struct lan78xx_net, including:
> 
>     driver_priv
>     suspend_count
>     link_on
>     mdix_ctrl
>     interface
>     fc_autoneg
>     fc_request_control
> 
> These fields are no longer used in the driver and can be safely removed
> as part of a cleanup.

Shouldn't these members be removed in the patches that removed their
users? For example, I think "interface" becomes unused in patch 2.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!