Exynos7870 SoC uses the ARM Mali T830 GPU, document its compatible
string with the appropriate fallback. The T830 compatible is already
defined in the panfrost driver, but was commented out as it was unused.

Signed-off-by: Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@disroot.org>
---
This patch series is a part of Exynos7870 upstreaming.
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-midgard.yaml | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-midgard.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-midgard.yaml
index 0801da33a385b42fa3a7ff367fafee54b1aae458..48daba21a890d24c02383672518bbd5cd7885d16 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-midgard.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-midgard.yaml
@@ -45,12 +45,15 @@ properties:
               - samsung,exynos7-mali
           - const: samsung,exynos5433-mali
           - const: arm,mali-t760
+      - items:
+          - enum:
+              - samsung,exynos7870-mali
+          - const: arm,mali-t830
       - items:
           - enum:
               - rockchip,rk3399-mali
           - const: arm,mali-t860
 
-          # "arm,mali-t830"
           # "arm,mali-t880"
 
   reg:

---
base-commit: df4b2bbff898227db0c14264ac7edd634e79f755
change-id: 20250203-exynos7870-gpu-ccb918e23b2e

Best regards,
-- 
Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@disroot.org>

On 17/03/2025 20:20, Kaustabh Chakraborty wrote:
> Exynos7870 SoC uses the ARM Mali T830 GPU, document its compatible
> string with the appropriate fallback. The T830 compatible is already
> defined in the panfrost driver, but was commented out as it was unused.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@disroot.org>
> ---
> This patch series is a part of Exynos7870 upstreaming.
> ---



<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
"received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof