> On May 12, 2025, at 2:14 PM, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
>
> !-------------------------------------------------------------------|
> CAUTION: External Email
>
> |-------------------------------------------------------------------!
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025, Jon Kohler wrote:
>> From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
>>
>> Add 'cpu_has_vmx_mbec' helper to determine whether the cpu based VMCS
>> from hardware has Intel Mode Based Execution Control exposed, which is
>> secondary execution control bit 22.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
>> Co-developed-by: Jon Kohler <jon@nutanix.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Kohler <jon@nutanix.com>
>
> LOL, really? There's a joke in here about how many SWEs it takes...
42, I think.
>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
>> index cb6588238f46..f83592272920 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
>> @@ -253,6 +253,12 @@ static inline bool cpu_has_vmx_xsaves(void)
>> SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_XSAVES;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline bool cpu_has_vmx_mbec(void)
>> +{
>> + return vmcs_config.cpu_based_2nd_exec_ctrl &
>> + SECONDARY_EXEC_MODE_BASED_EPT_EXEC;
>> +}
>
> This absolutely doesn't warrant its own patch. Introduce it whenever its first
> used/needed.
Yep, will do
>
>> +
>> static inline bool cpu_has_vmx_waitpkg(void)
>> {
>> return vmcs_config.cpu_based_2nd_exec_ctrl &
>> --
>> 2.43.0