mm/memory.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
Since pxd_clear_bad() is an operation changing the state of the page tables,
we should call arch_sync_kernel_mappings() post this.
Fixes: e80d3909be42 ("mm: track page table modifications in __apply_to_page_range()")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
---
mm/memory.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 78c7ee62795e..9a4a8c710be0 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2987,6 +2987,7 @@ static int apply_to_pmd_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud,
if (!create)
continue;
pmd_clear_bad(pmd);
+ *mask = PGTBL_PMD_MODIFIED;
}
err = apply_to_pte_range(mm, pmd, addr, next,
fn, data, create, mask);
@@ -3023,6 +3024,7 @@ static int apply_to_pud_range(struct mm_struct *mm, p4d_t *p4d,
if (!create)
continue;
pud_clear_bad(pud);
+ *mask = PGTBL_PUD_MODIFIED;
}
err = apply_to_pmd_range(mm, pud, addr, next,
fn, data, create, mask);
@@ -3059,6 +3061,7 @@ static int apply_to_p4d_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd,
if (!create)
continue;
p4d_clear_bad(p4d);
+ *mask = PGTBL_P4D_MODIFIED;
}
err = apply_to_pud_range(mm, p4d, addr, next,
fn, data, create, mask);
@@ -3095,6 +3098,7 @@ static int __apply_to_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
if (!create)
continue;
pgd_clear_bad(pgd);
+ mask = PGTBL_PGD_MODIFIED;
}
err = apply_to_p4d_range(mm, pgd, addr, next,
fn, data, create, &mask);
--
2.30.2
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 11:44:14PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote: > Since pxd_clear_bad() is an operation changing the state of the page tables, > we should call arch_sync_kernel_mappings() post this. Could you explain why? What effect does not calling arch_sync_kernel_mappings() have in this case?
On 14/03/25 2:14 am, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 11:44:14PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote: >> Since pxd_clear_bad() is an operation changing the state of the page tables, >> we should call arch_sync_kernel_mappings() post this. > > Could you explain why? What effect does not calling > arch_sync_kernel_mappings() have in this case? Apologies, I again forgot to explain the userspace effect. I just found this by code inspection, using the logic the fixes commit uses: we should sync when we change the pxd. The question I have been pondering on is, what is the use of the pxd_bad() macros, when do we actually hit a bad state, and why don't we just trigger a BUG when we hit pxd_bad()?
On 13/03/25 11:44 pm, Dev Jain wrote:
> Since pxd_clear_bad() is an operation changing the state of the page tables,
> we should call arch_sync_kernel_mappings() post this.
>
> Fixes: e80d3909be42 ("mm: track page table modifications in __apply_to_page_range()")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
> ---
> mm/memory.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 78c7ee62795e..9a4a8c710be0 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -2987,6 +2987,7 @@ static int apply_to_pmd_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud,
> if (!create)
> continue;
> pmd_clear_bad(pmd);
> + *mask = PGTBL_PMD_MODIFIED;
Oh well, I guess these should have been *mask |= PGTBL_PMD_MODIFIED.
> }
> err = apply_to_pte_range(mm, pmd, addr, next,
> fn, data, create, mask);
> @@ -3023,6 +3024,7 @@ static int apply_to_pud_range(struct mm_struct *mm, p4d_t *p4d,
> if (!create)
> continue;
> pud_clear_bad(pud);
> + *mask = PGTBL_PUD_MODIFIED;
> }
> err = apply_to_pmd_range(mm, pud, addr, next,
> fn, data, create, mask);
> @@ -3059,6 +3061,7 @@ static int apply_to_p4d_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd,
> if (!create)
> continue;
> p4d_clear_bad(p4d);
> + *mask = PGTBL_P4D_MODIFIED;
> }
> err = apply_to_pud_range(mm, p4d, addr, next,
> fn, data, create, mask);
> @@ -3095,6 +3098,7 @@ static int __apply_to_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> if (!create)
> continue;
> pgd_clear_bad(pgd);
> + mask = PGTBL_PGD_MODIFIED;
> }
> err = apply_to_p4d_range(mm, pgd, addr, next,
> fn, data, create, &mask);
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.